Trade Deadline Primer: Dallas Stars
With the Olympic break approaching, the trade deadline is about a month away. Where does each team stand, and what moves should they be looking to make? We begin our look around the league with teams that have clear plans at the extremes of the standings, next up with the Stars.
This season has been what you would expect from a roster as talented as Dallas’. Despite their success, they sit third in the very gifted Central Division and would face the Minnesota Wild in the first round if the season started today. That kind of series could be a coin flip and might be the kind of matchup that forces Dallas to add to an already talented roster. The Stars have only a few more kicks at the proverbial can in this contention window, and with a significant extension for Jason Robertson looming, this could be the year they go all in.
Record
33-14-9, 3rd in the Central
Deadline Status
Buyer
Deadline Cap Space
$3.267MM on deadline day, 0/3 retention slots used, 47/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: DAL 2nd, SEA 3rd, DAL 5th, DAL 6th, DAL 7th, TOR 7th
2027: DAL 1st, DAL 2nd, DAL 4th, DAL 5th, DAL 6th, DAL 7th
Trade Chips
Dallas doesn’t have a lot to work with in terms of prospects and picks, which is the cost of being a consistent Stanley Cup contender over the past half-decade. The Stars do have some young pieces they could move, though, if they go big-game hunting on the trade market. Defenseman Lian Bichsel was a first-round pick in 2022, and at 6’7”, he is the kind of hulking presence on the blue line that teams line up for. His transition to the NHL hasn’t been smooth, as the 21-year-old has dealt with injuries and inconsistency this season. Bichsel appeared ready to break out last season, but he hasn’t delivered this year and has struggled through 26 games, failing both the eye test and the analytics test. Bichsel has a lot of upsides, though, and could be the centrepiece of a much bigger deal if Dallas goes all in.
Another prospect Dallas could look to move is right winger Emil Hemming. The 19-year-old was selected in the first round (29th overall) of the 2024 draft and is having a strong offensive season with the Barrie Colts of the OHL. Hemming is a potential NHL power forward with a good shot and isn’t afraid to get dirty at the net. He also plays a solid two-way game, which should endear him to teams seeking well-rounded wingers. The Stars could pair Hemming with a second- or third-round pick if they are on the hunt for trade deadline candidates that aren’t in the upper tier of trade targets but are solid NHLers.
Another potential trade piece for the Stars is young WHL forward Cameron Schmidt of the Seattle Thunderbirds, who was recently involved in a significant trade in that league. The Stars took Schmidt in the third round of last year’s draft (94th overall) and might have gotten a steal given his performance in the WHL thus far this season. Schmidt is currently third in league scoring and likely would’ve been a first- or second-round pick had it not been for his size (5’8” and 161 lbs). Dallas had no problem rolling the dice with Schmidt after succeeding with small centre Logan Stankoven, who is now in Carolina, and they could go that route with Schmidt as well.
Now, the Stars might have a pretty barren prospect cupboard, but they do have another promising young player on the NHL roster in Mavrik Bourque, who, at 24, is far from a finished product. Bourque was a late first-round pick in 2020 (30th overall) and has blossomed into a depth scorer, but there is still untapped potential in his game. Bourque tore up the AHL in 2023-24 with 77 points in 71 games, but struggled through his rookie campaign last year, finishing with just 11 goals and 14 assists in 73 games.
This year, Bourque’s offensive numbers have ticked up slightly, a good sign, especially given that many of his underlying numbers are also moving in the right direction. It’s hard to say whether Dallas is willing to part with Bourque, as they have been patient with his development, but if they have a chance to acquire a player who pushes them over the top, one would have to believe they would part with him.
Team Needs
Right-Shot Top Four Defenseman: The Dallas Stars will be joined by several teams seeking a right-shot top four defenseman. The Stars are solid on the top pair, but Thomas Harley has had a tough year on the second pairing, paired with depth options, and the results have been underwhelming to say the least. Harley’s offensive numbers are only slightly off his usual pace from the past two years. Still, his underlying numbers and on-ice results have taken a steep drop, likely due to instability on the right side and playing with depth options such as Ilya Lyubushkin and Nils Lundkvist. A stable right-side partner, such as Dougie Hamilton, would go a long way toward alleviating some of the pressure on Harley. However, the math doesn’t exactly work with Hamilton unless Stars general manager Jim Nill gets extremely creative with the accounting, or forward Tyler Seguin is, in fact, done for the season and the playoffs.
A Top Nine Forward: The Stars would likely look to add a top-nine forward to improve depth up front, ideally on the left wing. Currently, the Stars are deploying Justin Hryckowian on the top line alongside centre Wyatt Johnston and Mikko Rantanen. Hryckowian is solid defensively and has some playmaking ability, but he is unlikely to be a top-six player for a team that fancies itself a Stanley Cup contender. There is some versatility with Hryckowian, as he can play centre, so the Stars have options to add a winger and shift the 24-year-old down the lineup and over to centre, depending on their configurations.
Dallas could also opt for a right winger on the trade market and bump Bourque down the lineup, if they want, or perhaps Sam Steel. Given the players currently in the lineup, there is significant shuffling that could occur, but Dallas likely wants to add one more piece to that group so it can place all of their remaining depth into roles that better suit their skill sets.
Photo by Jerome Miron-Imagn Images
The Trade-And-Extend Move Is Becoming A Gamble
Stars forward Jason Robertson is having another terrific season at just the right time. He’s set to become an RFA this summer and should be handsomely rewarded on his next contract.
One wrinkle with his next contract is that it could come with a team other than Dallas, given that they already have so much big money committed to members of their core (just $16.4MM in cap space available next year, per PuckPedia). If Robertson is moved, it would likely be via trade to a team hoping to sign him to a long-term deal. But given that many of these types of transactions have failed in the past, should teams be doing it?
The trade-then-sign isn’t an official title for a series of moves in which a team trades for a player and then locks them up shortly after the trade, but that’s effectively what it is. A few recent examples include the Senators trading for Linus Ullmark and then signing him shortly after, or the Flames and Panthers linking up on the infamous Jonathan Huberdeau-for-Matthew Tkachuk trade that launched Florida on a potential dynasty while effectively slamming the door on Calgary’s contention window.
Therin lies the risk with these kinds of moves. Trading for a player and then signing them immediately to an extension leaves you open to the possibility that they aren’t a good fit, and you end up with a Huberdeau situation instead of a Tkachuk one.
The Flames and Senators are hardly the only teams to fall victim to this kind of thing. In fact, the Senators have dealt with it before with Bobby Ryan. Ottawa traded for Ryan in 2013, a move in response to Daniel Alfredsson leaving the franchise to sign with Detroit. The trade effectively boxed the Senators into signing Ryan to a long-term contract, which they did, resulting in an albatross contract that was eventually bought out.
Vancouver is learning a similar lesson with defenseman Marcus Pettersson, who was a top-pairing defenseman in Pittsburgh but was dealt to the Canucks last year, before the trade deadline, and has never been a fit. Vancouver was quick to ink Pettersson to a six-year deal last year, shortly after acquiring him, and, like Ullmark, Huberdeau and Ryan, he has not worked out as planned.
The list could go on and on. Timo Meier in New Jersey, Seth Jones in Chicago, Matt Murray in Ottawa, and Pierre-Luc Dubois in Los Angeles. All of these moves had a few things in common. The teams signed the players to extensions before the fit was ever stress-tested.
Take Huberdeau, who was acquired in late July 2022. Within two weeks, he signed an eight-year, $84MM extension to remain with the Flames. Pettersson had a similar trajectory in Vancouver, as he was acquired in early February 2025 and signed his six-year extension less than a week later. The same story with Murray and the Ottawa Senators, as he was acquired in early October 2020 and re-upped within two days, having never played a game in Canada’s capital city.
Again, the examples are endless, and the failures in these situations appear to share several common traits. In the three examples of Huberdeau, Pettersson, and Murray, they had essentially never played for the teams they were signing with, meaning no one knew whether they would work out with their new teams, making it a gamble for the acquiring team. But the trades themselves, and the players’ contractual status, essentially forced the team that gave up the assets in the trade to lock up the player or risk “losing the asset for nothing.”
It’s something that happens in every sport, where teams acquire pending UFAs. For whatever reason, some teams have felt compelled to extend the player before they even have a look at how the player will work out with their new team. And make no mistake, most of the teams that have extended the player right away probably regret their decision. There is no way Ottawa was happy with the Murray era, and Calgary has another five years of headaches with the Huberdeau deal.
Often, a player’s signing is a move to protect a GM’s short-term reputation rather than to focus on long-term projections. In fact, most of the time, the GM never lasts the length of the deal he is handing out, as was the case with Brad Treliving in Calgary and Pierre Dorion in Ottawa.
The thing about rushing to sign a player you really don’t know, beyond scouting their on-ice performance, is that once you ink the deal, there is no easy escape, or do-overs. You are locked into a player you don’t really know, and outside of asking mutual friends, acquaintances, or previous employers, you don’t have first-hand experience with the person in most cases. It would be like running a business and then hiring an employee you’ve seen on television but never spoken to.
But in hockey, as in all sports, market and ownership pressures, egos, and reputations can all play a role in transactions, contracts, and player management. As much as it probably stings for GMs to ink a bad contract with a player, they would probably all do it again if given another opportunity.
The truth is that trading for a player is always risky, while trading for a player and immediately extending them is often how NHL GMs try to save their jobs. Usually, it’s the move that leads them to the unemployment line.
Blues Will Enter New Era If Robert Thomas Leaves
Trade rumors are kicking up as the March 6th Trade Deadline draws near. Central to recent discussion is St. Louis Blues top center Robert Thomas, who appears set to enter the prime years of his career on a team that’s falling short. That rift has opened discussions around Thomas’ future in St. Louis. The Blues would be open to moving their star, only if they receive an offer they can’t refuse or a younger, top-six forward, per Sportsnet’s Elliotte Friedman on the January 23rd episode of 32 Thoughts: The Podcast. It’s no surprise that St. Louis would need a convincing offer – moving on from Thomas would quickly thrust the franchise into its next era.
The search for a true top-center is a race every team must run. St. Louis has historically done well at making sure that role is locked down at all times. Hall-of-Famer Pierre Turgeon passed the title to Doug Weight in the early 2000’s, only for Keith Tkachuk to take over before the 2010’s. By then, St. Louis had promoted David Backes into a daily lineup role. He would go on to captain the team until 2016, when he moved to the Boston Bruins. That decision left St. Louis with a vacancy – briefly filled by Brayden Schenn – that they didn’t fully fill until acquiring Ryan O’Reilly ahead of their Stanley Cup-winning 2018-19 season.
O’Reilly separated from the Blues in 2023. By then, Thomas had reached 23 years old and nearly 300 games of NHL experience. He was ready to take on a true starring role, made evident by the 65 points he scored in 73 games of the 2022-23 campaign – then, a stout follow-up to the 77 points he scored in 2021-22. Thomas began receiving 20 minutes of ice time routinely following O’Reilly’s departure. He stood up to St. Louis’ top role – once filled by current and future Hall-of-Famers – with glowing results.
Thomas scored 26 goals and 86 points while playing all 82 games of the 2023-24 season, his first year as St. Louis’ unimpeded #1. He became the first Blue to reach the 60-assist mark in the 2000’s, and the first since Craig Janney in 1994. Like Janney, Thomas went back-to-back with the accolade, recording 21 goals and 81 points in 70 games last season.
The consecutive performances were more than lightning striking twice. Thomas became the central core of St. Louis’ offense in the top role. His versatility was invaluable as the Blues figured out how to deploy north-south scorer Jordan Kyrou, and youngsters like Jake Neighbours, without getting burned. Thomas did it all, showing just as much flash in puck battles against the end-boards as he did in open space at the tops of the circles.
Thomas’ success became a forgone conclusion after another statement year last season. With a faceoff percentage consistently north of 50 percent, and plenty of intangibles, the Blues had molded another well-rounded star into their top center role. But the 2025-26 season has disappointed. St. Louis ranks dead-last in the NHL in goals scored (126) which has cut Thomas’ scoring down to 33 points in 42 games – still the most on the team by five points.
At 26, Thomas is stepping into the golden years of his career. He has already won one Stanley Cup in St. Louis but may not have too many more chances to chase another with the club’s current trajectory. The Blues are set to turn over their general manager position to rookie manager Alexander Steen this summer. Once a candidate for St. Louis’ top-center role himself, Steen will face the task of pushing the Blues forward after – presumably – their third playoff miss in the last four seasons. The prospect cupboards are stocked – with top prospects like Dalibor Dvorsky, Dylan Holloway, and Jimmy Snuggerud already making a splash in the NHL.
If that young success will be enough to convince St. Louis to separate with their true star is unclear. Thomas has found deep roots with the Blues and offers enough talent to lift a rocky ship, with the right pieces around him. He could lead St. Louis back to the postseason within a couple years just as well as he could fetch them a hefty return on the open market. How the Blues weigh those outcomes could go a long way in showing their long-term trust in smooth-face GM Steen and his ability to find another top center.
Photo courtesy of Robert Edwards-USA TODAY Sports.
The Full Teardown Rebuild Doesn’t Work Anymore
A few years ago, it was common for NHL fanbases to call for their favorite team to bottom out when it came time to rebuild the organization’s roster, and for good reason. The bottom-out rebuild had become trendy because most Stanley Cup champions during the 2010s had used that method of roster construction, and other teams began copying it, as is often the case.
However, late in the decade, another trend began to surface: the teams that were bottoming out couldn’t turn the corner in their rebuilds and remained in a perpetual state of losing. That leads us to the past couple of seasons, when some of those teams, namely the Sabres, have remained at the bottom of the NHL standings, while others, such as the Capitals, have successfully orchestrated softer retools.
At this point, it’s becoming evident that the bottom-out rebuild no longer works in today’s NHL.
There are many reasons it doesn’t work. Most notably, the draft is no longer a safe bet for bottom-feeders to land generational talent. Ten years ago, high picks were nearly a guarantee if you finished at the bottom of the standings, and now, with the new draft odds, it’s much harder to win a top pick.
Teams can no longer rely on a top draft pick to secure elite talent, which has reduced the incentive to tank via roster construction. After all, you still need fans to buy tickets and merchandise, and they won’t do that if your club is getting beaten every night.
This leads to another point about tearing down the roster. If you do acquire young talent who have no one else to play with and play in a culture of losing, that type of environment does seem contagious.
You can simply look at Edmonton and Buffalo in the 2010s. They couldn’t shake the stink of a losing culture, and it seeped into much of their young talent. Buffalo is a particularly egregious example, as many of their top draft picks more or less forced their way out of Buffalo to go on and win Stanley Cups in other cities.
This culture also shapes the development outcomes for younger players and explains why some young players get drafted late but, once in an NHL environment, find new levels in their games they had never reached before. It was no accident in the 1990s and 2000s that the Red Wings consistently found stars late in the draft. They had built a development machine and a culture of excellence that brought out the best in all of their young players. That dynamic can go the other way if you have a culture of losing. There is a real irony to all of it. The worse your team is, the less equipped your organization is to develop the players who might save your franchise.
Even if you hit the lottery and draft elite players, it doesn’t compound year after year the way it used to when the Penguins could grab Marc-André Fleury, Evgeni Malkin, Sidney Crosby, and Jordan Staal. The new rules from 2022 mean that a team cannot win the lottery more than twice in five years. Now, technically, that wouldn’t change things in the case of Pittsburgh, as they traded up to draft Fleury and drafted Malkin and Staal second overall, but it does reduce the incentive to ice a poor roster.
It’s also difficult to sustain the financial costs of an NHL roster in the salary-cap era while intentionally fielding a poor roster for several seasons. Back when Pittsburgh and Chicago were building their bottom-feeding rosters, they could literally sign every player to the league minimum (and they almost did) because the salary-cap floor they had to meet to be cap-compliant was much lower. Now, with an elevated floor, very few NHL teams could afford to reach the floor and ice a poor roster year after year without suffering a significant drop in gate revenue.
Speaking of money, another wrinkle in the bottom-out rebuild is that if you somehow draft elite players and develop them into NHL stars, they are set to exit their entry-level contracts and cash in big. Young stars can demand bigger extensions earlier, meaning the cheap years of their careers are behind them, and the team has to allocate massive amounts of cap space to them and can’t insulate them with other players. Stated differently, once your rebuild starts to bear fruit, the discounted years are over.
Then there is the issue that it’s tough to deconstruct an NHL roster, and even when you try to tear it down, you might end up with a team that falls into the mushy middle. This has happened to the Penguins this season: they tried to trade many of their veterans this past summer (Rickard Rakell, Bryan Rust, Erik Karlsson) but weren’t able to, and now find themselves in a playoff hunt.
It would have been foolish for Pittsburgh to give away its top players for very little, and whether they were serious about moving them is known only to management. Still, they elected to hold onto them and continue to ice a team that is competing for a wild-card spot. This is different from 20-plus years ago, when there was no salary cap, and Pittsburgh could simply call the Rangers or the Capitals to dump their star players.
Finally, there is the difference that social media and modern society make in rebuilding a team. Twenty years ago, entertainment options were much more limited, so fans stuck around to watch their favorite team, even when it was bad. This meant that management and coaches had a longer leash to rebuild and develop young players, as ownership had more patience because supporters were more committed and less distracted by other forms of entertainment. Nowadays, though, fans have a million choices for their leisure time, and if their favorite club is bad, they can do other things to fill their time.
Social media also plays into this, as fans have a louder voice than ever, which can put pressure on ownership if the naysayers get too noisy or create their own narratives. A rebuild used to be allowed to breathe for months at a time with minimal criticism, but nowadays it is litigated on social media daily. This can accelerate impatience and force management and ownership to show progress more quickly, making the long, painful rebuild a near impossibility.
Then there is self-preservation, which is often the primary motivator in management, leading to avoiding the long rebuild or not fully committing to a teardown. GMs notoriously shorten their own timelines and make job-saving trades that often turn out to be poor moves for the organization and for themselves (Kevyn Adams in Buffalo, for example).
The modern reality of a rebuild is that it is no longer about losing for a long time and collecting top picks. You can do that and still go nowhere, as evidenced by many teams in the last ten years. Rebuilds have become about timing long-term contracts.
They’ve become about layering prospects so they arrive in consistent waves year after year, keeping your depth intact when your internal players become too expensive to retain. They’ve become about patience and development, avoiding giving up on players too early, moving them prematurely, getting impatient with your current roster, and making a bad move. And finally, they’ve become about protecting your assets, draft picks, roster players, and cap space.
The teams that win now are no longer the ones that lose their way to the top; they are the disciplined ones that build the right way.
Ryan Shea Is Going To Get A Big Raise This Summer
Saying that Penguins defenseman Ryan Shea is having a career year would be a massive understatement. The 28-year-old has two goals and 14 assists in 41 games, is a +15, and averages over 19 minutes a night.
While plus/minus is a flawed statistic, it is eye-opening to see it that high. Shea has played up and down the Penguins’ defense this season, pairing with the likes of Kris Letang, Jack St. Ivany, Harrison Brunicke, and Parker Wotherspoon. No disrespect to any of those players, but St. Ivany has been a tweener to this point in his career, Brunicke is back playing in the World Juniors, and Letang has been a mess defensively for most of the year, making the +15 all the more impressive.
Shea spent much of the season paired with Letang, but in the last week, Shea and St. Ivany have formed an effective shutdown pairing for the Penguins, coinciding with an intense stretch of play for the team. Shea’s adaptability and offensive emergence couldn’t have come at a better time for the three-year NHL pro, as he is slated to be an unrestricted free agent on July 1 and is set to earn a healthy raise from the $900K he is making this year.
Shea signed that one-year deal last March, and it seemed like an odd bit of business for the Penguins at the time, as they were busy selling off at the trade deadline and Shea was a candidate to be moved. Pittsburgh general manager Kyle Dubas clearly saw something he liked in Shea’s game and gave him a raise and guaranteed NHL money for this season in an extension that has been a windfall for Pittsburgh at a time when they needed a left-handed defenseman to step up and fill a massive weakness.
Not only did Shea step up, but he also effectively became the type of player Pittsburgh needed to acquire if they wanted to contend for a playoff spot, which may or may not have been the plan. Regardless of the intentions, Pittsburgh is in the playoff hunt, and Shea has been a massive part of that.
So, what is the plan for Shea now? That is the million-dollar question, or in Shea’s case, the multi-million-dollar question.
At the beginning of the season, AFP Analytics projected a one-year deal worth $1.075MM for Shea next season. That number is obviously going to be different now, but it’s fair to wonder how different it will be.
Shea has a lot working in his favor in his contract negotiations. He is still relatively young, doesn’t have a lot of NHL mileage on his body, and capable defensemen are always in demand.
Just look at one of his predecessors as Letang’s partner, Brian Dumoulin, who is much older and worn down, and who got three years and $12MM as a UFA last summer. On the flip side, Shea doesn’t have a long NHL resume, having played 111 games and entering his third season.
He also doesn’t have a track record as an impact defender outside this year. Shea had pedestrian results last season in 39 games, posting two goals and three assists, but he was leaned on heavily defensively. He didn’t have too many opportunities to chip in offensively.
His free agency is going to get interesting over the next two months, particularly if the Penguins stay in contention for a playoff spot and opt to hold onto him. Pittsburgh gave Shea his NHL opportunity, signing him to NHL money before he ever played an NHL game, demonstrating faith in his ability to become an NHL defenseman.
That 2023 signing showed absolute trust from Dubas and the Penguins, and it makes one wonder whether Shea will reward the team with a discount in negotiations. There is also a precise fit for both Shea and the team.
He fills a need well, and even on an extension, he won’t cost more than a potential replacement would in free agency or a trade. That said, there is always a risk in signing a one-hit wonder, as his play could be a mirage, and you end up locked in long-term with a player who can’t cut it in the NHL.
If the Penguins fall out of contention, on the other hand, it could change the complexion of Shea’s future, particularly if they deal him to a different team. Therein lies the risk for Shea, because if he gets traded elsewhere and falls flat on his face, it would pretty much tank his prospects for a long-term deal on the open market. But if he gets moved and succeeds, it removes a significant question mark surrounding him.
It remains to be seen whether Pittsburgh will even deal Shea if they fall out of contention. They didn’t last year, when Shea was more of an unknown, and it would seem silly to trade him now, when you have a better idea of what he can be in the NHL.
Pittsburgh might just sign him even if they fall out of contention, because they have the cap space and know what they have in Shea. They also have a ton of other pending UFA defensemen who don’t figure to be part of their future, and they could move those instead.
What could Shea be looking at in terms of a contract extension? It’s hard to predict, given the current economic climate.
Still, there are a couple of comparables, such as the Flyers’ Emil Andrae and the Flames’ Jake Bean. AFP Analytics has Bean pegged for a two-year deal worth $2.25MM per season, while Andrae is projected at $1.7MM AAV on a two-year deal. Declan Chisholm of the Capitals is another decent comparison in terms of career numbers. He signed his contract extension as an RFA, inking a two-year deal worth $1.6MM annually.
The issue with the Chisholm comparison is that he was an RFA, while Shea is unrestricted. However, using the framework of all the aforementioned contracts, it seems likely that Shea is headed for a two-year deal, possibly three, at a rate that probably tops the Bean projection.
However, this is the NHL, and it wouldn’t be shocking to see Shea sign a four-year deal worth $3MM or more annually, given the surging salary cap and teams’ desperation for reliable defenseman.
Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images.
The Blackhawks Already Have A Top Line Winger On The Way
Since the Blackhawks selected Connor Bedard first overall in 2023, the most glaring holes on their depth chart have been the two wing spots next to him.
Bedard’s most common linemates at 5-on-5 in year one were Nick Foligno and Philipp Kurashev. In year two, amid a never-ending rotation, Ryan Donato and Ilya Mikheyev eked out the honors.
This year, it’s André Burakovsky and rookie Ryan Greene. The 20-year-old’s continued emergence into a top-tier superstar and increased defensive commitment this season have helped fuel a resurgence for the former, with Burakovsky’s nine goals and 23 points in 34 games on pace for his highest totals in three years. Greene, only one year older than Bedard, is up to 14 points in 39 games after a recent hot streak.
Of course, Bedard’s 44 points on the year are still nearly twice what his best support man, Burakovsky, has posted, despite missing the last several games with a shoulder injury. While Chicago’s early hot start offered some promise, it’s clear now that was a Spencer Knight-fueled mirage as they’ve slipped back to being one point out of last place. As for Bedard and his support system, the talent gap has never been more apparent – even Kurashev and Donato finished within spitting distance for the team lead in points in 2023-24 and 2024-25, respectively.
With a top-two pick spent on Artyom Levshunov and an elite young netminder acquired in Knight, Chicago has stars lined up at every position – except for Bedard’s linemates, if only looking at the NHL roster for the past few years is any indication.
In reality, the pieces to complete an era-defining forward line for the Hawks are already in place and won’t necessarily require the big free-agent splash that some were hoping for this year or last. One of them comes down to a math problem. In the early stages of their careers, Chicago has preferred to keep Frank Nazar separate from Bedard at 5-on-5 and have them each center their own lines. That’s largely worked out well with Nazar on a 52-point pace in his second NHL season.
Center Anton Frondell is on the way as well after being drafted third overall last year. With 10 goals and 15 points in 25 games for Djurgårdens IF in a challenging European pro environment in the SHL, he will almost certainly be a top-six option for the Blackhawks in 2026-27. Neither he, Bedard, nor Nazar is suited for third-line duties long-term. One of them will slot in on Bedard’s wing next season.
The premise of this article could all be for naught if the Hawks end up with another lottery pick in this year’s draft. Their selection would almost undoubtedly be either Gavin McKenna or Ivar Stenberg, both wingers with the skill level to drop in as a Bedard running mate out of camp. But if the balls don’t bounce their way, there’s an in-house candidate who will likely get a shot with a mix of Bedard, Frondell, and Nazar next fall.
Roman Kantserov has long been overlooked as an impact piece. Perhaps that’s simply because Chicago’s wealth of draft picks over the past several years has created one of the deepest pools in recent memory.
The 2023 second-round pick wasn’t viewed as much of a draft steal at the time. He was the 16th-ranked European skater by NHL Central Scouting, and only one major public scouting service had him as a late first-rounder (some even had him in the third).
No longer can he be ignored. Fast forward three years, and the 21-year-old is already a champion and an All-Star in Russia’s Kontinental Hockey League, a top-three competition in the world. Even that doesn’t give proper credence to what the undersized but extremely high-motor winger has brought to the table this season. With a 26-19–45 scoring line in 38 games, he’s third in the KHL in scoring and is first in pure goal-scoring. If that holds, he will break Kirill Kaprizov‘s record as the youngest single-season goal-scoring leader, albeit only by a few months.
McKeen’s Hockey tabbed Kantserov as the No. 8 prospect in the Hawks’ pool entering the season and profiled him as a “high-energy, third-line grinder with the potential to contribute offensively.” He’s answered the bell on the last part of that sentence as best as he possibly can before making the jump from Russia. Pairing two sub-6’0″ players on a top line may be an area of concern, but his pace and physicality make him a near-perfect stylistic complement for Bedard, with his historic overseas production suggesting he boasts much more upward mobility in their lineup than some thought.
Kantserov is in the final season of his contract with Metallurg Magnitogorsk. Technically, his contractual obligations won’t conclude until May 31, but KHL clubs have shown some degree of willingness to release players a few weeks early – assuming their season is over – to sign NHL entry-level contracts. Whether that’s something Chicago wants to pursue to get Kantserov in the lineup for the final few games of the regular season remains to be seen. It should be a foregone conclusion, though, that he will be given a lengthy runway to add his name to Chicago’s long list of young, NHL-ready stars come September.
Big Hype Prospects: Zharovsky, Barlow, Nestrasil, Zajicek
Welcome to PHR’s Big Hype Prospects series. Like the MLB Trade Rumors series of the same name, we’re taking a look at the performances of top prospects from across the hockey world. We’ll look at drafted prospects who are rising, others who are struggling, and prospects for the upcoming draft who are notable.
Four Big Hype Prospects
Alexander Zharovsky, RW, Montreal Canadiens (Ufa Salavat Yulayev, KHL)
31 GP 11G 17A 28pts
The Montreal Canadiens are currently benefiting greatly from the nightly performances of star rookie Ivan Demidov, a hugely talented Russian winger with the kind of offensive ability that can dazzle fans on a nightly basis. Demidov’s excellent rookie season does not come as a huge surprise to most, as just last season he managed to lead his KHL team in scoring — a hugely impressive feat for an 18-year-old player.
And yet Demidov may not be the only Canadiens prospect to accomplish that feat. Zharovsky, the club’s top selection at the 2025 NHL Entry Draft, currently leads the KHL’s Ufa Salavat Yulayev in scoring with 28 points in 31 games. The next-highest scorer, veteran Jack Rodewald, has 25 points in 39 games. Just one other player on the team has reached the 20-point mark.
The fact that Demidov led SKA in scoring last season threatens to leave Canadiens fans somewhat jaded at the prospect of another youngster leading his KHL team in scoring. But they should be reminded that the KHL, Russia’s top professional league, is a circuit with a longstanding reputation of being notoriously difficult for teenage players to gain a foothold in. Demidov himself had to contend with this, sometimes finding himself in an extremely limited role in SKA’s lineup despite his obvious talent.
Zharovsky’s brilliant 2025-26 campaign thus far has served as a clear indication that the Canadiens likely nabbed a first-round caliber talent in the early portion of the second round of the draft. Zharovsky was one of the fastest-rising players of last year’s draft process. He barely registered on scouting radars early last season. NHL Central Scouting did not include him on their preliminary watch list last October, nor was he ranked in the midterm rankings in January. Central Scouting caught onto Zharovsky by the end of the season, ranking him No. 5 among international skaters in their final rankings.
Most public-facing outlets had Zharovsky ranked in the early to middle portion of the second round of the draft, as high as No. 35 (TSN’s Bob McKenzie) and as low as No. 49 (Corey Pronman of The Athletic). In his ranking, Pronman wrote that while Zharovsky’s MHL production “needs to be looked at with a grain of salt,” due to the fact that he managed those numbers “in the clear worst division in that league.” He finished writing Zharovsky “could be a bottom six wing,” but it’s clear the Canadiens disagreed.
In their media availability following the draft, the Canadiens’ co-directors of amateur scouting Nick Bobrov and Martin Lapointe indicated to the media that not only did they project Zharovsky as a future top-six winger, but they also had him ranked on their draft board inside the first round, right around the slot of the two first-round picks they ultimately dealt to the New York Islanders in the Noah Dobson trade.
While it’s still far too early to tell whether Zharovsky will live up to the Canadiens’ expectations or fall more in line with Pronman’s projection, the early returns have been extremely promising for Montreal. Just as he did in the MHL, Zharovsky’s KHL performance will likely be met with some skepticism due to the fact that the division Zharovsky plays in, the Chernyshev Division, is arguably the league’s weakest.
But it is nonetheless extremely impressive to see a winger of Zharovsky’s age lead his team in scoring in his rookie KHL campaign. Zharovsky was named a KHL All-Star and the league’s rookie of the month for October and November. He ranks second in scoring in the KHL among all players aged 22 and younger, behind only Chicago Blackhawks prospect Roman Kantserov, who is 21 years old. While we won’t know for some time whether Zharovsky will truly end up as the top-six offensive talent the Canadiens believe he can be, his progression at the moment has been highly encouraging.
Colby Barlow, RW, Winnipeg Jets (Manitoba Moose, AHL)
25 GP 2G 3A 5pts
Of the first 20 picks of the 2023 NHL Entry Draft, just four selected players have yet to make their NHL debut: No. 5 pick David Reinbacher (MTL), No. 14 pick Brayden Yager (PIT, traded to WPG), No. 18 pick Barlow (WPG), and No. 20 pick Eduard Sale (SEA). While the pace of a prospect’s development is no sure indicator of that player’s future NHL success, and it must be repeatedly emphasized that player development is not a linear process, it is still notable when a highly-drafted prospect begins to fall behind his peers.
In Barlow’s case, he appears to have fallen behind quite considerably. This is actually not the first time Barlow has appeared in the Big Hype Prospects series, as he also was covered in a September 2024 article written by colleague Gabe Foley. Foley correctly noted that Barlow was a lock to be traded from his OHL team at the time (the Owen Sound Attack) and expressed some hope that the expected OHL trade would provide Barlow with some much-needed momentum in his final year before turning pro.
While OHL trades provided a spark for other CHL first-rounders to have hugely productive final campaigns in junior hockey (Conor Geekie and Matthew Savoie were two names specifically referenced by Foley) that didn’t happen for Barlow, who scored 32 goals and 61 points in 62 games as a member of the Oshawa Generals.
While Barlow did score at a higher rate in the second half of the year, and did follow up the regular season with a stellar postseason run (33 points in just 21 games), it appears he hasn’t been able to translate that momentum into tangible production to start his pro career.
Barlow is now 25 games into his first full season in the AHL, and he’s managed just five points.
The 20-year-old has long been viewed as a potential NHL sniper, with his shot credited as one of his standout tools. Pronman wrote in August that “Barlow’s calling card is his shot” but noted that “his offensive inconsistency is a concern.”
Elite Prospects’ Lauren Kelly wrote around the same time that Barlow’s “playmaking showed significant growth” in Oshawa, and that the development “bodes well for his move to the AHL.”
Breaking down exactly why Barlow’s offensive momentum appears to have stalled at the AHL level isn’t a simple task. He does get to play with some talented linemates, currently skating alongside 2022 first-rounder Brad Lambert and 2021 second-rounder Nikita Chibrikov.
But neither Lambert nor Chibrikov have been particularly productive this season. Despite having linemates that are, on paper, of high quality, Barlow hasn’t had the chance to play all that much this season. He ranks last in average ice time per game among all Moose skaters with at least 20 games played this season.
Given Barlow’s struggles in his rookie AHL campaign and the Moose’s apparent reluctance to play him higher in the lineup on a regular basis, it could be that a change of scenery ends up the best outcome for both Barlow and Winnipeg.
Barlow has, without question, thus far failed to live up to the Jets’ investment of a first-round pick in him. And Barlow could argue that the Jets have similarly failed to give him the kind of high-minute AHL role that would allow him to build momentum early in his pro career.
As the Jets look to plot their way forward amidst a deeply disappointing 2025-26 NHL campaign, they could seek to acquire reinforcements for their NHL roster via trade. If they end up doing so, Barlow could be one of the top prospects the Jets elect to trade in one of those transactions.
Vaclav Nestrasil, RW, Chicago Blackhawks (UMass Amherst, NCAA)
18 GP 10G 10A 20pts
If there’s one single player archetype that is most widely coveted across the NHL, a strong argument could be made that it’s a forward who combines devastating size and physicality with a high level of offensive skill. Those players come few and far between, and when one manages to establish himself at the NHL level, there’s usually no shortage of teams trying to line up to acquire his services.
Selected No. 25 overall at the 2025 NHL Entry Draft, Nestrasil has a very real chance of becoming that kind of player at the NHL level. The 6’5″, 190-pound winger still has a ways to go in terms of his physical development to reach that point, but the start to his collegiate career has been extremely impressive.
The Blackhawks’ selection of Nestrasil No. 25 overall was met with some skepticism. The player managed only 42 points in 61 USHL contests as a member of the Muskegon Lumberjacks, which is below the typically expected level of production for a first-round pick.
Though Nestrasil’s 13 points in 14 playoff games did help Muskegon win the Clark Cup Championship, his eventual draft ranking varied wildly in the public sphere. The team at Elite Prospects ranked him No. 26 on their board, but most other outlets ranked him somewhere in the 35-45 range. He was even ranked as low as No. 65, by TSN’s Craig Button.
While most scouts commended Nestrasil’s energy level, non-stop motor, and ability to impact a game even when he couldn’t score, many questioned whether he’d be able to bring a level of consistent production that would justify the investment of a first-round draft choice.
Nestrasil’s first 18 games of college hockey have gone a long way towards addressing — but not permanently silencing — those skeptics. He has managed 10 goals and 18 points, good for second on the team behind undrafted 22-year-old Jack Musa.
Because other freshmen players are also having an incredible start to their NCAA career (Pittsburgh Penguins 2025 first-rounder Will Horcoff has 19 goals in his first 20 games, for example), Nestrasil’s sharp improvement in offensive production over last season has flown more under the radar than it perhaps deserves to. But if any Blackhawks fans decide to tune into Amherst games this season, it’s possible they could be watching a long-term linemate for franchise face Connor Bedard.
The team is still searching for long-term pieces to pair Bedard with, and Nestrasil’s compete level, size, physicality, and offensive touch could complement the star center quite well. There’s still a ways to go before Nestrasil reaches that point, but so far in his NCAA career, Nestrasil’s stock appears to be rapidly rising.
Simon Zajicek, G, Boston Bruins (Providence Bruins, AHL)
12 GP 10-1-1, .934 sv% /1.93 GAA
The history of free agent imports from European professional leagues is a spotty one. Where there have been teams that have found considerable success bringing over star players from top European pro circuits, others have seen their investments flame out and quickly return to the other side of the Atlantic. For every Karel Vejmelka or Alexander Radulov there appears to be five Jan Kovar‘s or Jakub Jerabek‘s.
The Bruins have traded away a considerable number of draft picks over the last half-decade as a result of the organization’s push to win the Stanley Cup within that time frame. Those moves have depleted the Bruins’ prospect pool, and left their scouts with fewer resources at their disposal to replenish that pool of prospects.
One route organizations in that sort of a position often take to try to maintain a pipeline of young players despite having fewer draft picks is signing free agent players from the NCAA, the CHL, or the European pro circuit. Edmonton Oilers GM Stan Bowman is an example of a hockey operations executive that has been aggressive in his targeting of European free agents, and he had some success doing so with the Chicago Blackhawks, landing long-term NHL players such as Antti Raanta, Erik Gustafsson, and most notably, Artemi Panarin.
The Bruins appeared to try to replicate his approach this past summer when they signed Zajicek, a netminder from the Czech Extraliga. In his age-23 season, Zajicek led the Extraliga in save percentage, putting up a .930 mark across 29 games played. The year prior, he posted a .909 save percentage across 20 games for HC Litvínov.
Zajicek was signed to form a tandem with AHL star Michael DiPietro, and despite his inexperience in North American pro hockey, Zajicek has been stellar to start his AHL career. Through 12 games, Zajicek has gone 10-1-1 with a .934 save percentage. His performance, along with the strong performances of DiPietro, have helped Providence rank No. 2 in the AHL in fewest goals surrendered so far in 2025-26.
While it’s too early to tell whether Zajicek’s performance is truly a reflection of a promising NHL future or more of a product of a high-quality defensive environment around him, his stellar form to start the year does suggest that he may end up making a push for an NHL role in Boston or somewhere where there is more of a pressing need for goaltending.
Photos courtesy of Perry Nelson-Imagn Images
2025-26 In-Season NHL Trades
Pro Hockey Rumors will keep track of all trades made during the 2025-26 campaign, right up until the last day of the regular season, updating this post with each transaction.
Trades are listed here in reverse-chronological order, with the latest at the top. So, if a player has been traded multiple times, the first team listed as having acquired him is the one that ended up with him. If a trade has not yet been formally finalized, it will be listed in italics. The terms or structures of those deals could still change before they’re officially completed.
For our full story on each trade, click on the date above it. We’ll continue to update this list with the latest specific details on picks and other compensation, as they’re reported.
You can reference this post under the “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” menu on the right sidebar on desktop or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu.
Here’s the full list of the NHL’s 2025-26 in-season trades:
- Kings acquire F Jan Jeník
- Islanders acquire D Samuel Bolduc
- Red Wings acquire F Michael Milne and F Wojciech Stachowiak
- Lightning acquire D Ian Mitchell
- Predators acquire F Dalton Bancroft and F Massimo Rizzo.
- Bruins acquire F Navrin Mutter.
- Senators acquire F Graeme Clarke.
- Capitals acquire F Wyatt Bongiovanni.
- Flames acquire F Brennan Othmann.
- Rangers acquire F Jacob Battaglia.
- Sabres acquire F Tanner Pearson.
- Jets acquire the Sabres’ 2026 seventh-round pick.
- Avalanche acquire F Nazem Kadri and the Flames’ 2027 fourth-round pick.
- Flames acquire F Victor Olofsson, F Max Curran, Avalanche’s 2028 first-round pick, and the Avalanche’s 2027-second round pick.
- Capitals acquire D Timothy Liljegren.
- Sharks acquire Golden Knights’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Red Wings acquire D Justin Faulk.
- Blues acquire D Justin Holl, F Dmitri Buchelnikov, the Red Wings’ 2026 first-round pick, and the Sharks’ 2026 third-round pick.
- Bruins acquire F Lukas Reichel.
- Canucks acquire Bruins’ 2026 sixth-round pick.
- Capitals acquire F David Kampf.
- Canucks acquire Capitals’ sixth-round pick.
- Kings acquire F Scott Laughton.
- Maple Leafs acquire Kings’ conditional 2026 third-round pick.
- Note: Pick becomes a second-round pick if Kings make the playoffs.
- Flames acquire F Ryan Strome.
- Ducks acquire Flames’ 2027 seventh-round pick.
- Kraken acquire F Bobby McMann.
- Maple Leafs acquire Kraken’s 2027 second-round pick and 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Blackhawks acquire D Derrick Pouliot.
- Rangers acquire F Aidan Thompson.
- Penguins acquire F Elmer Soderblom.
- Red Wings acquire Sharks’ 2026 third-round pick.
- Islanders acquire F Brayden Schenn.
- Blues acquire F Jonathan Drouin, G Marcus Gidlof, Avalanche’s 2026 first-round pick, Devils’ 2026 third-round pick.
- Hurricanes acquire F Nicolas Deslauriers.
- Flyers acquire Flyers’ 2027 seventh-round pick.
- Panthers acquire F Vinnie Hinostroza.
- Wild acquire future considerations.
- Lightning acquire F Corey Perry.
- Kings acquire Tampa Bay’s 2028 second-round pick.
- Wild acquire F Nick Foligno.
- Blackhawks acquire future considerations.
- Flyers acquire F Brett Harrison and D Jackson Edward.
- Bruins acquire F Alexis Gendron and F Massimo Rizzo.
- Wild acquire F Bobby Brink.
- Flyers acquire D David Jiříček.
- Ducks acquire D John Carlson.
- Capitals acquire the Ducks’ 2026 first-round pick and the Ducks’ 2027 third-round pick.
- Note: the Ducks can choose to defer the first-round pick to 2027 if they fail to qualify for the 2026 Stanley Cup Playoffs.
- Sabres acquire D Logan Stanley and D Luke Schenn (50% retained).
- Jets acquire F Isak Rosen, D Jacob Bryson, the Sabres’ 2027 second-round pick, and the better of the Sabres’ or Oilers’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Sabres acquire F Sam Carrick.
- Rangers acquire the Sabres’ 2026 third-round pick and the Blackhawks’ 2026 sixth-round pick.
- Blue Jackets acquire F Conor Garland.
- Canucks acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2028 second-round pick and a third-round pick.
- Red Wings acquire F David Perron.
- Senators acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Note: the pick only transfers if Perron plays at least one game for Detroit. If the Red Wings reach the second round of the playoffs and Perron plays in at least half their games in the first round, the pick upgrades to Detroit’s 2026 third-round selection.
- Senators acquire F Warren Foegele and a conditional 2026 third-round pick.
- Kings acquire the Sabres’ 2026 second-round pick and a conditional 2026 third-round pick.
- Note: view the article for the explanation of the conditions.
- Stars acquire F Michael Bunting.
- Predators acquire the Kraken’s 2026 third-round pick.
- Canucks acquire D Jack Thompson.
- Sharks acquire D Jett Woo.
- Wild acquire D Jeff Petry.
- Panthers acquire the Wild’s 2026 seventh-round pick.
- Note: the pick upgrades to Minnesota’s 2026 fifth-rounder if the Wild win at least two playoff rounds and Petry plays in 50% of playoff games.
- Avalanche acquire F Nicolas Roy.
- Maple Leafs acquire the Avalanche’s 2027 first-round pick (top-10 protected) and the lowest of the three fifth-round picks owned by the Avalanche in the 2026 draft (their own, the Bruins’, and the Flyers’).
- Golden Knights acquire F Nic Dowd.
- Capitals acquire G Jesper Vikman, the Sharks’ 2027 third-round pick, and the Golden Knights’ 2029 second-round pick.
- Oilers acquire F Jason Dickinson (50% retained), F Colton Dach.
- Blackhawks acquire F Andrew Mangiapane and the Oilers’ 2027 first-round pick (top-12 protected).
- Note: the Oilers’ 2027 first-round pick becomes unprotected if Edmonton trades away its 2028 first-round pick before the 2027 draft.
- Avalanche acquire D Nick Blankenburg.
- Predators acquire the Avalanche’s 2027 fifth-round pick.
- Mammoth acquire D MacKenzie Weegar.
- Flames acquire D Olli Määttä, signing rights to F Jonathan Castagna, and the Mammoth’s, Rangers’, and Senators’ 2026 second-round pick.
- Stars acquire D Tyler Myers (50% retained).
- Canucks acquire the Stars’ 2027 second-round pick and 2029 fourth-round pick.
- Golden Knights acquire F Cole Smith.
- Predators acquire the Golden Knights’ 2028 third-round pick and D Christoffer Sedoff.
- Wild acquire F Michael McCarron.
- Predators acquire the Wild’s 2028 second-round pick.
- Oilers acquire D Connor Murphy (50% retained).
- Blackhawks acquire the Oilers’ 2028 second-round pick.
- Flyers acquire F Boris Katchouk.
- Wild acquire D Roman Schmidt.
- Penguins acquire D Samuel Girard and the Avalanche’s 2028 second-round pick.
- Avalanche acquire D Brett Kulak.
- Islanders acquire F Matt Luff.
- Blues acquire F Julien Gauthier.
- Kings acquire F Artemi Panarin.
- Rangers acquire F Liam Greentree, a conditional 2026 third-round pick, and a conditional 2028 fourth-round pick.
- Conditions: The Rangers will receive the better of the Kings’ or the Stars’ 2026 third-round pick. The selection will upgrade to the Kings’ 2026 second-round pick if L.A. wins at least one playoff round. The Kings’ 2028 fourth-round pick will only transfer if they win at least two playoff rounds in 2026.
- Devils acquire F Nick Bjugstad.
- Blues acquire F Thomas Bordeleau and a conditional 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Condition: the Blues will receive the latest of the Devils’, Stars’ or Jets’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Stars acquire D Jeremie Poirier.
- Flames acquire D Gavin White.
- Islanders acquire F Ondřej Palát, the Devils’ 2026 third-round pick, and the Devils’ 2027 sixth-round pick.
- Devils acquire F Maxim Tsyplakov.
- Islanders acquire D Carson Soucy.
- Rangers acquire the Islanders’ 2026 third-round pick.
- Sabres acquire D Gavin Bayreuther.
- Hurricanes acquire F Viktor Neuchev.
- Penguins acquire D Ilya Solovyov.
- Avalanche acquire F Valtteri Puustinen and the Penguins’ 2026 seventh-round pick.
- Sharks acquire F Kiefer Sherwood.
- Canucks acquire D Cole Clayton, the Sharks’ 2026 second-round pick, and the Sharks’ 2027 second-round pick.
- Golden Knights acquire D Rasmus Andersson (50% retained).
- Flames acquire D Zach Whitecloud, the Golden Knights’ 2027 first-round pick, a conditional 2027 second-round pick, and the signing rights to D Abram Wiebe.
- Condition: The 2027 second-round pick will upgrade to Vegas’ 2028 first-round pick if they win the Stanley Cup in 2026.
- Hurricanes acquire D Kyle Masters and the Sharks’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Sharks acquire the Blackhawks’ 2027 fifth-round pick.
- Ducks acquire F Jeffrey Viel.
- Bruins acquire the Flyers’ or Red Wings’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Condition: The Bruins will acquire the highest of the two available draft selections.
- Sharks acquire D Nolan Allan, G Laurent Brossoit, and the Blackhawks’ 2028 seventh-round pick.
- Blackhawks acquire D Ryan Ellis, D Jake Furlong, and the Sharks’ 2028 fourth-round pick.
- Hurricanes acquire D Juuso Välimäki.
- Mammoth acquire future considerations.
- Penguins acquire D Egor Zamula.
- Flyers acquire RW Philip Tomasino.
- Penguins acquire RW Yegor Chinakhov.
- Blue Jackets acquire LW Danton Heinen, the Blues’ 2026 second-round pick, and the Capitals’ 2027 third-round pick.
- Wild acquire LW Boris Katchouk.
- Lightning acquire LW Michael Milne.
- Blue Jackets acquire LW Mason Marchment.
- Kraken acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2027 second-round pick and the Rangers’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
- Canadiens acquire C Phillip Danault.
- Kings acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2026 second-round pick.
- Wild acquire D Quinn Hughes.
- Canucks acquire D Zeev Buium, C Marco Rossi, LW Liam Ohgren, and the Wild’s 2026 first-round pick.
- Oilers acquire G Tristan Jarry and C Samuel Poulin.
- Penguins acquire G Stuart Skinner, D Brett Kulak, and the Oilers’ 2029 second-round pick.
- Oilers acquire D Spencer Stastney.
- Predators acquire the Oilers’ 2027 third-round pick.
Players On 2026 World Juniors Rosters By NHL Team
This year’s World Juniors kick off in just over an hour with a Group A clash between Sweden and Slovakia in St. Paul. With all 10 countries’ rosters locked in, it’s time to look at which prospects each NHL team will see representing them on the world’s biggest stage for under-20 players.
Only three teams – the Blue Jackets, Golden Knights, and Hurricanes – do not have a representative on an opening roster. The Mammoth and Predators lead the way with seven prospects each, while the Canadiens, Capitals, Ducks, Flyers, Islanders, Red Wings, and Sharks are other teams with five-plus.
Anaheim Ducks
- D Lasse Boelius (Finland)
- G Elijah Neuenschwander (Switzerland)
- C Eric Nilson (Sweden)
- C Lucas Pettersson (Sweden)
- D Darels Uljanskis (Latvia)
Boston Bruins
- D Vashek Blanár (Czechia) not registered for opener
- C James Hagens (USA)
- LW Will Zellers (USA)
Buffalo Sabres
- D Adam Kleber (USA)
- D Radim Mrtka (Czechia) not registered for opener (injury)
- D Luke Osburn (USA)
- RW Brodie Ziemer (USA)
Calgary Flames
- D Zayne Parekh (Canada)
- C Cole Reschny (Canada)
Carolina Hurricanes
none
Chicago Blackhawks
- C Anton Frondell (Sweden)
- RW Vaclav Nestrasil (Czechia)
- RW A.J. Spellacy (USA)
NHL Players Who Can Veto Trades In 2025-26
Trade and movement protection is becoming increasingly common in the NHL. There are three forms. A no-movement clause, in addition to giving the player the right to veto any trade, allows them to block waiver placements and subsequent minor-league reassignments as well. No-trade clauses are the simplest, giving the player full veto power over a trade, but also the rarest.
The most common form of trade protection is the modified no-trade clause, which allows a player to submit a list of teams they can or can’t be traded to. An M-NTC can also include kicker dates that change the level of protection the player has. Most every team has at least one of these on their books.
To be eligible for an NMC, NTC, or M-NTC, the player must be at least 27 years old at the beginning of the league year or have accumulated seven years of service – in other words, the same requirements for unrestricted free agency.
With those criteria in mind, here are the players who must give their consent to some degree if their teams want to trade them during the 2025-26 league year. Players with M-NTCs have the amount of teams they can block a trade to in parentheses (with noted exceptions for rare ‘yes’ or approved trade lists).
Anaheim Ducks
No-movement clauses: none
No-trade clauses:
Modified no-trade clauses:
- D Radko Gudas (10)
- RW Alex Killorn (15)
- LW Chris Kreider (15)
- RW Troy Terry (10)
- D Jacob Trouba (15)
- LW Frank Vatrano (7)
Boston Bruins
No-movement clauses:
No-trade clauses:
Modified no-trade clauses:
- D Henri Jokiharju (8)
- C Pavel Zacha (8)
Buffalo Sabres
No-movement clauses:
No-trade clauses: none
Modified no-trade clauses:
- LW Jordan Greenway (5)
- C Tage Thompson (5)
- RW Alex Tuch (5)
- LW Jason Zucker (5)

