AHL, ECHL Affiliations For 2025-26
There haven’t been many affiliation changes between NHL clubs and their minor-league feeders from last season to the upcoming campaign. There are no affiliate swaps to report, but the ECHL’s continued expansion has shifted the picture slightly as the Double-A league looks to eventually match its NHL and AHL parents in size at 32 teams apiece. Incoming are the Greensboro Gargoyles for 2025-26, who will give the ECHL 30 member clubs and will become the Hurricanes’ full-time second-tier affiliate after they split the Bloomington Bison with the Rangers last season.
That leaves just the Blue Jackets and Senators without a dedicated ECHL team for their AHL club to work with. Here’s the full list of every club’s minor-league affiliates for the 2025-26 season:
Anaheim Ducks
AHL: San Diego Gulls
ECHL: Tulsa Oilers
Boston Bruins
AHL: Providence Bruins
ECHL: Maine Mariners
Buffalo Sabres
AHL: Rochester Americans
ECHL: Jacksonville Icemen
Calgary Flames
AHL: Calgary Wranglers
ECHL: Rapid City Rush
Carolina Hurricanes
AHL: Chicago Wolves
ECHL: Greensboro Gargoyles
Chicago Blackhawks
AHL: Rockford IceHogs
ECHL: Indy Fuel
Colorado Avalanche
AHL: Colorado Eagles
ECHL: Utah Grizzlies
Columbus Blue Jackets
AHL: Cleveland Monsters
ECHL: n/a
Dallas Stars
AHL: Texas Stars
ECHL: Idaho Steelheads
Detroit Red Wings
AHL: Grand Rapids Griffins
ECHL: Toledo Walleye
Edmonton Oilers
AHL: Bakersfield Condors
ECHL: Fort Wayne Komets
Florida Panthers
AHL: Charlotte Checkers
ECHL: Savannah Ghost Pirates
Los Angeles Kings
AHL: Ontario Reign
ECHL: Greenville Swamp Rabbits
Minnesota Wild
AHL: Iowa Wild
ECHL: Iowa Heartlanders
Montreal Canadiens
AHL: Laval Rocket
ECHL: Trois-Rivieres Lions
Nashville Predators
AHL: Milwaukee Admirals
ECHL: Atlanta Gladiators
New Jersey Devils
AHL: Utica Comets
ECHL: Adirondack Thunder
New York Islanders
AHL: Bridgeport Islanders
ECHL: Worcester Railers
New York Rangers
AHL: Hartford Wolf Pack
ECHL: Bloomington Bison
Ottawa Senators
AHL: Belleville Senators
ECHL: n/a
Philadelphia Flyers
AHL: Lehigh Valley Phantoms
ECHL: Reading Royals
Pittsburgh Penguins
AHL: Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins
ECHL: Wheeling Nailers
San Jose Sharks
AHL: San Jose Barracuda
ECHL: Wichita Thunder
Seattle Kraken
AHL: Coachella Valley Firebirds
ECHL: Kansas City Mavericks
St. Louis Blues
AHL: Springfield Thunderbirds
ECHL: Florida Everblades
Tampa Bay Lightning
AHL: Syracuse Crunch
ECHL: Orlando Solar Bears
Toronto Maple Leafs
AHL: Toronto Marlies
ECHL: Cincinnati Cyclones
Utah Mammoth
AHL: Tucson Roadrunners
ECHL: Allen Americans
Vancouver Canucks
AHL: Abbotsford Canucks
ECHL: Kalamazoo Wings
Vegas Golden Knights
AHL: Henderson Silver Knights
ECHL: Tahoe Knight Monsters
Washington Capitals
AHL: Hershey Bears
ECHL: South Carolina Stingrays
Winnipeg Jets
AHL: Manitoba Moose
ECHL: Norfolk Admirals
Free Agent Profile: Jack Roslovic
After a disappointing end to his brief tenure with the New York Rangers, Jack Roslovic had to settle for a one-year prove-it deal with the Carolina Hurricanes last summer. Despite a solid rebound campaign, Roslovic is in a similar position to the one he was in last summer.
Even though plenty of teams are seeking additional center depth, Roslovic’s sporadic career may be why no team has prioritized him this offseason. After serving in a bottom-six role with the Winnipeg Jets to start his career, Roslovic became a key secondary contributor after joining his hometown Columbus Blue Jackets ahead of the 2020-21 NHL season.
Before his trade to the Rangers, Roslovic scored 51 goals and 146 points in 246 games as a Blue Jacket, averaging 15:50 of ice time per game. After the Rangers acquired Roslovic at the 2023-24 trade deadline, he concluded the season with three goals and eight points in 19 games, along with another two goals and eight points in 16 playoff matches.
The Hurricanes signed Roslovic to a one-year, $2.8MM deal for the 2024-25 season, and he rewarded them well. He finished the campaign with 22 goals and 39 points in 81 games, averaging 13:49 of ice time and being a flexible option. Carolina is the first team where Roslovic averaged over a 50.0% faceoff rate, although he primarily played on the wing.
Stats
2024-25: 81 GP, 22 G, 17 A, 39 PTS, -10, 10 PIMS, 139 shots, 13:49 ATOI, 57.9 CF%
Career: 526 GP, 102 G, 158 A, 260 PTS, -37, 80 PIMS, 825 shots, 14:12 ATOI, 59.0 CF%
Potential Suitors
Assuming that most teams view Roslovic as a reliable scoring winger rather than a center at this point in his career, he should have quite a few options to pick from. The Boston Bruins, Colorado Avalanche, Blue Jackets, Seattle Kraken, Toronto Maple Leafs, Vancouver Canucks, and Washington Capitals could all use additional depth on the right side of their forward core.
The Bruins and Maple Leafs don’t have a high amount of salary cap space left to work with. Still, it should be plenty to sign Roslovic at this point in the summer. Roslovic may have a desire to stay on the East Coast to remain close to Ohio, so the Avalanche and Kraken may be out of the question for the nine-year veteran.
Projected Contract
Before the start of free agency, ProHockeyRumors had Roslovic as the 20th-best option on the free agent market, with a projected three-year, $10.5MM contract ($3.5MM AAV). Unfortunately for our projections and more importantly, Roslovic’s earning power, he’s unlikely to receive a contract of that value this offseason.
Still, he’s not at a point where he has no leverage. As a recent 20-goal scorer, Roslovic is in a solid position to land a one-year deal in the $2MM to $3MM range. Assuming a one-year deal, he’ll enter next summer as a 29-year-old unrestricted free agent.
Photo courtesy of Perry Nelson-Imagn Images.
The Predators Are Banking On Internal Improvement
The Nashville Predators “won” last summer’s free agency period, signing Steven Stamkos, Jonathan Marchessault and Brady Skjei to lucrative long-term contracts. The summer victory was short-lived, however, as the Predators struggled to start the season and never regained their footing, ultimately falling to the bottom of the Western Conference standings.
The regular season exposed Nashville, revealing that it was a flawed team that was far from contending for the playoffs. Now, a year later, the Predators have taken a very conservative approach to their summer spending, and alas, they are still a flawed team that might struggle to score this season.
One of the most significant issues for Nashville, if not the biggest, is that its center depth is lacking, particularly in the scoring department. Stamkos is slated to be their top-line pivot, followed by Ryan O’Reilly.
While Stamkos is a first-ballot Hall-of-Famer and O’Reilly could sneak in, they weren’t exactly driving offense last year. Beyond the two of them, the scoring dries up further as the Predators’ options are currently Fedor Svechkov, who had an okay rookie season, as well as Erik Haula and Michael McCarron. No disrespect to Haula or McCarron, who are both decent defensive forwards, but they aren’t going to drive a line and won’t contribute much to Nashville’s offense.
Now, Nashville has a lot of young center depth in the pipeline, including the recently drafted Brady Martin, but those prospects are all a few years away and won’t help this upcoming season. The prospects will need playing time at some point soon, which has led some to speculate that the Predators might consider trading O’Reilly. However, general manager Barry Trotz remains pretty committed to the players he signed last summer and can’t exactly spring for a rebuild, yet.
The Predators’ murky center situation is a microcosm for the whole roster. As it is currently constructed, many of the players in the lineup will be playing outside of their ideal slot. Sure, Filip Forsberg, Roman Josi, Juuse Saros, O’Reilly, and Marchessault are all slotted fine. Still, Michael Bunting, for example, is currently in the top six and is probably best suited as a top-nine forward.
Speaking of Bunting, much of his season will hinge on how he starts. Last season in Pittsburgh, Bunting had an atrocious start to the season, with just a single assist in his first six games, before he was a healthy scratch. Bunting would play another 52 games in Pittsburgh, tallying 14 goals and 14 assists before he was traded to the Predators. Upon joining Nashville, Bunting played in 18 games to close out the season, registering five goals and four assists. The 29-year-old is a bit of a wild card in Nashville since he doesn’t do all that much away from the puck, but when he is on, he is a capable scorer who can post 20 goals and 50 points.
Much of Nashville’s hopes are like the hopes they have for Bunting. They are banking on internal improvement, perhaps better overall chemistry, and better luck. It’s not the worst strategy in the world, and probably a better course than blowing up the roster or trying to trade a pile of futures for short-term help.
The Predators had a pile of players experiencing down years. Stamkos, Marchessault, Bunting, Skjei, Josi and Saros all had off years, and if even half of them were to bounce back, we are looking at a very different Nashville team next season. However, there is no guarantee that they will bounce back; given the age of some of the players named, they may even regress further. However, Nashville is constrained by high-priced contracts and can only hope for some positive regression.
As far as team chemistry, the Predators would hardly be the first team to spend a significant amount of money in the summer only to have negative results. It’s happened in every major sport, including hockey, with perhaps the best example being the New York Rangers of the early 2000s, who repeatedly outspent every team in the league but couldn’t even get a sniff of the playoffs. The more the Rangers added at that time, the more the team’s chemistry became disjointed, which eventually led to a massive selloff towards the end of the 2004 season and ultimately a reset. The Predators have avoided adding much to their lineup this offseason; however, they have tinkered around the edges with the additions of defensemen Nicolas Hague and Nick Perbix.
Finally, as far as luck goes, Nashville didn’t have much of it last season, as evidenced by their PDO (shooting plus save percentages), which was dead last in the NHL at .970 (per MoneyPuck). Now, PDO alone doesn’t tell the whole story, but the top teams in the NHL typically have a PDO above 100, and the Predators were nowhere close to that. Much of that falls on the goaltender, Saros, who had the worst season of his career and will be looking to bounce back. If he can get back closer to his career average numbers, and the Predators’ offensive guys can get back to their career average shooting percentage, the Predators could make some moves in the Western Conference to try and climb back into the playoff conversation next season.
Photo by Kim Klement Neitzel-USA TODAY Sports
PHR Mailbag: Capitals, Sharks, Hamilton, Tanking, Bruins, Maple Leafs, Summer Winners And Losers
Topics in this edition of the PHR Mailbag include assessing San Jose’s busy last few weeks, early offseason winners and losers, and much more. If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in last weekend’s mailbag while we have one more to run from our last callout for questions next weekend.
letsgonats: The Capitals seemed to come in second place for the Ehlers sweepstakes. If McMichael moves to 3C, who is the 2nd line LW and 3rd line RW? It seems that the Caps trade a lot for Sourdif so he is given a 4th line winger slot. Do the Caps pull a trade we are not thinking about or do they take two from Beauvillier, Frank, Milano, Miroshnichenko, Cristall, Trineyev, or Lapierre and only a few have AHL options so waiver or trades for the others?
Before I answer your scenario, I’m going to throw another one out there. What if they flip McMichael and Pierre-Luc Dubois, a player who has played on the wing before? I could see them giving that a shot at some point as well, keeping both players in the top six. In your McMichael as the third-line center scenario, I think Ryan Leonard is on the right wing, allowing them to continue to ease him in. Right now, I think Anthony Beauvillier gets the spot on the second line to start at least. In a perfect world, a youngster forces his way into that spot but better to be conservative in early forecasting. And I agree on Justin Sourdif; at a minimum, he’s on the fourth line with Nic Dowd and Brandon Duhaime.
I don’t see Ivan Miroshnichenko or Bogdan Trineyev realistically pushing for a roster spot. The former is waiver-exempt while the latter will need waivers. Hendrix Lapierre makes it since he’s waiver-eligible and won’t get through without being claimed. I’d have him as the 13th forward which isn’t ideal development-wise. It wouldn’t shock me if Sonny Milano and Andrew Cristall are battling for the 3LW spot. If Cristall is ready, Milano lands on waivers and if not, he starts in Hershey. That leaves Ethen Frank who I think they’d be comfortable keeping as the 14th forward, something they can afford with their current cap space. That would push Dylan McIlrath to waivers but he has cleared several times before and should again.
With some waiver-exempt pieces, there isn’t as much of a logjam as it might seem. Honestly, I could see them sniffing around on another forward should one become available and if that pushes Frank to waivers, I think they’d be okay with that.
SirCobblestone: With the addition of the Sharks on defense (even if it’s not done I assume) and the potential add of Misa with Dickinson and Askarov, where do you see the Sharks land with a top six composed of Celebrini, Misa, Smith, and Eklund at Wing and Toffoli with Orlov and Klingberg. That should be a good add on defense.
You’re missing a top-six forward in there which I imagine will be Alexander Wennberg, at least until he’s traded as a rental center at some point in the season, allowing one of Will Smith or Michael Misa to get some time in at their natural position. That group has a lot of upside but teams with that many youngsters in prominent roles are going to struggle. There’s just no way around that with four entry-level forwards in the top six.
As for the defense, it has definitely improved with the additions of Dmitry Orlov, Nick Leddy, and John Klingberg but that’s a low bar to clear as San Jose’s back end was really bad last year. The problem is that it’s still not very good. Klingberg is a question mark defensively and Leddy is coming off a really rough year. Orlov is overpaid but decent at least. If Sam Dickinson is added to this group (they’re going to need to move out more than just Henry Thrun for that to happen), there will be some growing pains defensively although he’d give them a big lift offensively with Klingberg. This is the definition of a patchwork back end; of the seven they have signed now on one-way deals, only one (Orlov) is signed beyond this season. It’s better but this is still not a playoff-worthy group.
As for the goaltending, Yaroslav Askarov is the big wild card. Like many, I have high expectations for him over the long haul but for the upcoming season, there are going to be some growing pains as he adjusts to being the starter at the NHL level for the first time while playing behind a defense that still isn’t particularly strong. Alex Nedeljkovic is a serviceable backup but I expect his numbers to nosedive next season given the situation.
So, where do I see San Jose next season? Probably in the same spot where they were last season, in the basement of the Pacific Division. Things are definitely looking up and they’re not going to be down there for much longer but this is going to be another season where process and development are more important than results. They’re not ready to emerge from the rebuild yet and their activity this summer suggests GM Mike Grier is fully aware of that.
SpeakOfTheDevils: Let’s play hypothetical and say the Devils DO trade Dougie Hamilton, what kind of return could we be looking at??? And likeliest trading partners????
I’m going to go with the second question first here. I could see Toronto being in there as they could use a top offensive threat. Detroit has done next to nothing to improve a back end that certainly struggled last year so they’d be in the mix I’d think. I’m sure Dallas would love to swing that but the term remaining would be an option; I think they’re more of a fit for Erik Karlsson if Pittsburgh pays down a good chunk of his deal. Buffalo has been searching for an impact right-shot defender for ages now but it would surprise me if he’s on Hamilton’s list of 10 teams he’d accept a trade to.
Several teams can afford him but at the stage of the rebuild they’re in, they’re probably not a good fit. Others like Calgary and Winnipeg don’t seem like teams on his trade list either. And this is the problem; between Hamilton’s trade protection, cap hit, and performance, there’s not a great market for his services. I don’t even think Detroit would be on his yes list so we’re down to Toronto and if New Jersey wants to pay down some of the contract, maybe Dallas.
So, the short answer to your question in terms of a return is nothing that would justify trading Hamilton. If Pittsburgh trades Karlsson, they’ll be able to get positive value but probably nothing of consequence. Salary ballast, maybe a second-round pick, and perhaps something else. That’s something, but nothing to get excited about. Is Hamilton going to be able to bring back more that with three years left on his deal? Maybe if it’s more of a player-for-player straight-up swap (if Morgan Rielly was willing to waive his trade protection, maybe there’s a foundation of a trade there) but otherwise, I wouldn’t be counting on it. So, something around what I think Karlsson would get would be my answer to the first question.
Hamilton managed to be healthier last season but also dropped below 20 minutes a night which, for a $9MM blueliner, is a little concerning. With Johnathan Kovacevic out for a bit to start the season, I don’t expect them to seriously consider trading him. The Devils want to stay in the playoffs and Hamilton is a better insurance policy than whatever bits and pieces they could get in a trade.
tucsontoro1: Is it time for the league to do something substantial about tanking?
The Blackhawks are clearly in “full tank mode” for the 25–26 season.
Let me answer your question with a question – how would the league do that? The NHL has already lowered the draft odds and it hasn’t served as a deterrent. They’ve also put in something saying a team can’t advance their pick in the lottery more than twice in five years, a change that hasn’t garnered much attention yet since it hasn’t come into play.
The NBA gives equal odds for the bottom three finishers (and fourth is only a bit lower) but that didn’t stop teams from tanking for Cooper Flagg. And the end result for two drafts now has been a team with odds of 3% or less jumping up to the top spot (Dallas from 11th to take Flagg and Atlanta from 10th to take Zaccharie Risacher). Will that stop teams from tanking in basketball next season? Probably not.
MLB started drawing for the first six selections back in 2023 instead of going by reverse standings while also putting some restrictions on teams drafting in the lottery back-to-back times. Did that stop the Athletics from tanking for three straight years? Nope, even though they were slotted 11th in last week’s draft as a result of the rule changes. The White Sox were terrible last year but knew going in that they couldn’t pick in the lottery even if they had the worst record; clearly, it wasn’t a deterrent that prevented them from tanking. Meanwhile, there are some overtly tanking teams there this season too (including the White Sox again, no less). And the NFL still goes by reverse standings with teams already seemingly jockeying themselves for first overall.
Sure, the NHL could flatten the odds more or put more restrictions on picking in the top five, for example. But in the grand scheme of things, if that happened, does anyone think Chicago or San Jose would change course? In a system where top young talents are distributed through a draft system, teams are going to try to position themselves to have the best chance at getting one of those if they know they’re not in a spot to realistically contend for a playoff spot. This strategy, one that exists in each of the big four professional sports, isn’t going anywhere.
SkidRowe: What can the Bruins do? They need scoring and have only $2 million in cap space. Would you trade Zacha, Poitras, Mittelstadt, Minten, or Korpisalo?
I’m going to say no to trading Matthew Poitras or Fraser Minten. Might they fetch a capable veteran to help in the short term? I think they would. But they’re not going to bring back enough of a difference-maker to materially improve Boston’s fortunes. These are young centers with some promise and that’s the type of player they need to be keeping around as longer-term fits.
If Boston is confident that Michael DiPietro can be a capable NHL backup, moving Joonas Korpisalo makes sense in theory. Jeremy Swayman can probably handle a similar workload to last season, meaning DiPietro would only need to make 25 starts or so. The question here, however, is what market is there for a goalie right now, especially one with a cap charge of $3MM (not including the $1MM Ottawa is covering)? He could fit in Edmonton but they can’t afford him. Same with Vegas. Maybe Carolina but is he demonstrably better than their tandem? I like the idea of trading Korpisalo more than the potential of it actually happening but if it did, that’s something they could reinvest into their offense.
The other two are a little more interesting. Casey Mittelstadt isn’t a rental, he has a track record of some offensive success, and he’s a center. Given the immense demand for capable middlemen right now, I think there would be a good market for him. On the other hand, Boston’s center depth isn’t great and I’d like to see how he fares under new head coach Marco Sturm first. If the new system helps get him going, he could be more of a potential longer-term fit.
If Boston is comfortable with deploying one of the two young centers on a regular basis (or playing one of Sean Kuraly or Mikey Eyssimont on the third line), Pavel Zacha could be expendable. At $4.75MM, he’s someone some teams can afford and while he’s coming off a quieter year, 47 points is still decent; it was good enough for a share of third in team scoring. But it begs the question of why Boston, a team that needs firepower, would move one of their better point-getters from a year ago? Maybe if there’s a winger that’s signed or controllable for longer than Zacha (a pending UFA), there’s a lateral swap to be made but otherwise, I’d reassess closer to the trade deadline.
Despite Boston’s spending spree this summer, I don’t think they’ve done enough to get back to the playoff picture. Moving one of those pieces for a bit more firepower on the wing isn’t going to change that. So, personally, I wouldn’t be making any win-now trades unless this group proves me wrong and shows it’s worthy of some moves to help them in the second half of the season. Otherwise, Zacha could be a very useful rental for someone, yielding the Bruins a nice future asset in return.
2025 International Signings Recap: SHL
Weeks into NHL free agency and months into most European leagues’ signing windows, it’s a good time to review the notable action that has seen NHL-experienced players find new homes in other countries. We’re starting with the Swedish Hockey League with signings that have come across the wire in the last two months:
F Kieffer Bellows – one year, Brynas IF: Bellows heads overseas for the first time after playing in four NHL organizations in the last three seasons (link to signing article).
D Gabriel Carlsson – three years, Farjestad BK: The 2015 first-round pick lands some stability in his home country after spending last season with Switzerland’s EV Zug. The physical shutdown lefty last played in the NHL with the Capitals in 2022-23 and only managed 81 career games despite appearing in seven straight seasons, mainly with the Blue Jackets, who drafted him No. 29 overall. He has previous SHL experience with Linköping HC in his teenage years and also played for Växjö Lakers HC in the 2023-24 season, where he scored 26 points with a +18 rating in 45 games.
G Collin Delia – one year, Brynas IF: Delia, 31, served as the Oilers’ fourth-stringer last season and had a .906 SV% in 28 games for AHL Bakersfield (link to signing article).
F Gabriel Fortier – two years, Leksands IF: Fortier was a Group VI unrestricted free agent after playing the last five seasons in the Lightning organization, mostly with AHL Syracuse. The 2018 second-round pick played 11 NHL games across the 2021-22 and 2022-23 seasons, scoring once, but didn’t see action in the last two years. His scoring has steadily declined, posting only 19 points in 50 games last year, so it’s not particularly surprising to see him head overseas.
D Mark Friedman – two years, Rogle BK: A solid press box option on NHL rosters for a few years, Friedman was mostly relegated to AHL action last season and will now look for more stability and ice time overseas (link to signing article).
D Robert Hagg – one year, Brynas IF: Hagg spent last season on a two-way deal with the Golden Knights, spending most of the year in the AHL but getting into a pair of NHL contests (link to signing article).
G Magnus Hellberg – three years, Djurgardens IF: Hellberg jumps back to his homeland after spending last season as the Stars’ No. 3 option and starter for AHL Texas, posting a .904 SV% in 41 games (link to signing article).
F Aleksi Heponiemi – two years, HV71: Heponiemi, whose NHL rights are still owned by the Panthers, hasn’t played for them since the 2022-23 campaign (link to signing article).
F Jere Innala – one year, Frolunda HC: Innala’s NHL sample ends after one season with the Avalanche, going pointless in 17 games for them in 2024-25 (link to signing article).
F Axel Jonsson-Fjallby – three years, Brynas IF: Jonsson-Fjallby last played in the NHL with the Jets in 2023-24 and spent all of last season on assignment to AHL Manitoba (link to signing article).
D Michal Kempny – one year, Brynas IF: A member of the Capitals team that won the 2018 Stanley Cup, Kempny has been in Europe since mutually terminating his contract with the Kraken at the beginning of the 2022-23 season. He spent the last three years in his home country with HC Sparta Prague of the Czech Extraliga. Although he was a top point producer early on, he recorded just eight points in 24 games last year. He turns 35 in September and will now look to play a supporting role on the reigning SHL regular season champions.
F Justin Kloos – two years, HV71: It’s a lateral move for the 31-year-old, who’s already spent the last four years in the SHL with Leksand. The speedy but undersized forward has two NHL games to his name, one each with the Wild and Ducks in the 2017-18 and 2018-19 campaigns, respectively. He was an undrafted free agent signed by the Wild out of the University of Minnesota in 2017 and was a strong AHL producer for a few years. However, he has been overseas since 2019, also spending one year in Russia with Torpedo Nizhny Novgorod. He scored 47 goals and 106 points in 177 games with Leksand.
F Janne Kuokkanen – four years, Malmö Redhawks: Kuokkanen, 27, has alternated between Switzerland and Sweden since heading to Europe in 2022, but now lands some stability with Malmö. He registered over a point per game for them previously in the 2023-24 season. The Finnish native made 119 NHL appearances for the Hurricanes and Devils from 2017-22, scoring 14 goals and 46 points with a -26 rating.
F Karson Kuhlman – one year, Rogle BK: Kuhlman has nearly 150 games of NHL experience with the Bruins, Kraken, and Jets. He spent last season in Finland with Lukko, where he put together a 21-25–46 scoring line in 60 games (link to signing article).
D Paul Ladue – one year, Rogle BK: LaDue stays in Sweden’s top flight after spending last season with MoDo, which has been relegated to the HockeyAllsvenskan for 2025-26. The 32-year-old is a veteran of 70 NHL games with the Kings and Islanders from 2016 to 2022. Last year was his first overseas stint after being a consistent farmhand in the Isles’ system for AHL Bridgeport. He scored 17 points with a minus-seven rating in 50 games for MoDo.
D Gustav Lindstrom – five years, Djurgardens IF: The 2017 second-round pick spent last season in the Montreal organization with AHL Laval, recording 11 points and a +18 rating in 42 games (link to signing article).
F Sean Malone – two years, Orebro HK: A longtime Sabres farmhand with two games of NHL experience with them and the Predators, Malone last saw NHL ice with Nashville in 2020-21 and last played in North America for AHL Rochester in 2022-23. The 6’0″ Buffalo native has played in Switzerland for the previous two years, scoring 20 goals and 67 points in 90 National League games for the SCL Tigers.
F Lukas Rousek – two years, HV71: Rousek, 26, did not see NHL ice with the Sabres in 2024-25 after making 17 appearances for them across the 2022-23 and 2023-24 campaigns (link to signing article).
F Joe Snively – one year, Djurgardens IF: Snively, long a top AHL producer, heads over to help the newly-promoted Djurgarden after spending last season on a two-way deal with the Red Wings (link to signing article).
F Jesse Ylonen – two years, Djurgardens IF: Ylonen chose Djurgarden after not getting into any NHL action last season with either the Lightning or Predators, instead recording 35 points in 66 games across their AHL affiliates (link to signing article).
The Sabres Are Still Stuck In Neutral
The Buffalo Sabres haven’t made the playoffs in a long time. They set an NHL record this season by missing the postseason for 14 consecutive seasons, and don’t appear to be on track to break that streak this season.
The last time the Sabres played in a playoff game was a 5-2 loss to the Philadelphia Flyers on April 26th, 2011. To put the event into perspective, consider that current NHL general managers Mike Grier and Daniel Briere participated in the game, and over on NBC, the television series The Voice premiered that night.
Buffalo has been stuck in a constant state of rebuilding that hasn’t managed to gain any momentum. Just a few seasons ago, it looked like the Sabres were on the verge of becoming a contender. Still, a series of poor trades, bad signings, and unfortunate player development have kept the Sabres at the bottom of the Eastern Conference standings.
The fans in Buffalo are no doubt eager for something to cheer about, but unfortunately, the team hasn’t been able to satisfy that desire. The bad news for Buffalo is that much of their problems are self-inflicted, and since they haven’t course-corrected this summer, it’s fair to wonder: when will they turn things around?
It’s not as if Buffalo hasn’t had their fair share of good luck in the draft, selecting some terrific players late in the process, including Linus Ullmark in the sixth round back in 2012, Victor Olofsson in the seventh round in 2014, and Brandon Hagel in the sixth round in 2016. They’ve also managed to draft franchise cornerstones like Rasmus Dahlin and Owen Power.
However, where the team has fallen short – arguably the most glaring issue in drafting and development – is that they haven’t been able to retain their stars or have traded them away for little value.
The most obvious example here is Sam Reinhart, who was drafted second overall in 2014 and scored 20+ goals in five of his six seasons with the Buffalo Sabres, including 25 goals in his final year during the shortened 2020-21 season. The Sabres then traded Reinhart in the summer of 2021 for a return that included goaltender Devon Levi and a first-round pick that was later used to select Jiri Kulich.
Now, Reinhart had one year left on his contract, and many felt he wouldn’t sign long-term with Buffalo as they were rebuilding, even though Reinhart said otherwise. The trade could still work out for Buffalo, depending on Levi’s development and how 21-year-old Kulich progresses.
However, for Reinhart and the Panthers, it has been a great match, having reached the Stanley Cup Final three times and won two championships. Reinhart was a solid player for Buffalo, but in Florida, he has reached another level and become a key part of the Panthers’ team, averaging a point per game. The emergence of players like him has become a bit of a theme for former Sabres, as shown by our next star.
Not many people would have predicted that Ullmark would develop into a Vezina Trophy winner; however, there were signs that he was better than his numbers in Buffalo. Ullmark spent two seasons with the Sabres’ AHL affiliate in Rochester and was one of the top netminders in the league before making the full-time jump to the NHL.
He began his career as a backup for Carter Hutton but quickly took the starting job, posting a 50-47-13 career record with the Sabres, along with a 2.78 goals-against average and a .912 SV%. In the summer of 2021, the Swedish netminder moved to Boston, where he thrived with the heavyweight Bruins and left Sabres fans wondering what might have been.
There are likely several personal and professional reasons why Ullmark chose to leave Buffalo. Still, it was ultimately clear that the Sabres were pivoting towards a rebuild around the time of his departure.
Another missed opportunity, and perhaps one of the most painful, is Hagel. The Sabres chose to give up his rights back in 2018, and he later signed an ELC with the Chicago Blackhawks before being traded to Tampa Bay for two first-round picks.
Hagel recently represented Canada at the 4 Nations Face-Off and has become a genuine top-six player at the age of 26. It’s another clear example of Buffalo getting things right at the draft but missing out on player retention. Now, Hagel is undoubtedly a different case than Reinhart and Ullmark, but it shows how deep the Sabres’ issues run.
Sabres general manager Kevyn Adams has taken some heat in recent years, and rightfully so, since he is responsible for building the roster. However, his record includes three situations that have aged so poorly they overshadow his entire GM resume.
The Reinhart trade with Florida was mentioned earlier and could turn out alright in the future, but the situation doesn’t look good right now. The other two major missteps were the Jack Eichel deal with Vegas, which brought in a couple of good players but none of Eichel’s calibre.
The trade wasn’t that bad, but the worst part of the Eichel saga was the lead-up to the move. Then there is the Brandon Montour trade with Florida. The Montour trade is especially painful and quite different from the other two moves. But, each of these situations led Buffalo to trade away the best player in each deal, only to see those players raise the Stanley Cup with their new team.
Now, Adams’ moves haven’t been all bad. The trade for defenseman Bowen Byram looks like a win, given the decline of Casey Mittelstadt, and the Ryan McLeod trade with Edmonton also looks like a decent move.
The Sabres have managed to bring in players with potential, but it never seems to catapult the Sabres into a winning team. Getting Alex Tuch in the Eichel deal was a nice story, and he’s had some good years, but he could follow so many before him in less than 12 months when he becomes an unrestricted free agent.
All of this brings us to the current Sabres, who are once again fresh off trading away a talented young player. The Sabres traded JJ Peterka to the Utah Mammoth just a month ago in exchange for forward Josh Doan and defenseman Michael Kesselring.
The 23-year-old Peterka scored 27 goals and 41 assists in 77 games last season and was quick to sign a five-year extension with the Mammoth following the trade, something he wasn’t willing to do in Buffalo. Now, the verdict is still out on this trade because all three players involved are pretty young and aren’t yet finished products, but the return felt underwhelming at the time of the deal.
There does seem to be a pattern with players not signing long-term with the Sabres and opting to move to other cities. However, the Sabres have managed to secure their core players—Dahlin, Power, and Tage Thompson—with long-term contracts.
That said, it’s concerning that many players appear content to either ride out their current contract and bolt or use their leverage to pursue a trade. This doesn’t necessarily mean Reinhart or Ullmark did that, but it could explain a lot.
So here the Sabres are, down another potential star player in a long line of such players who never flourished in Buffalo. Sabres fans have watched star after star march to the Stanley Cup Final with other NHL teams without so much as a sniff of the playoffs in Buffalo. It’s a testament to Sabres fans that they continue to cheer for an organization that hasn’t given them much to cheer about in the last decade and a half, but it demonstrates the dedication of the fan base.
Photo by Timothy T. Ludwig-USA TODAY Sports
Poll: Top Remaining Free Agent
More than two weeks into NHL free agency, it’s no surprise that the top-tier players on the market have already secured deals. In fact, many secondary and depth signings have also been completed. According to PuckPedia, 244 contracts have been signed, totaling just over $1 billion.
Still, there are a few recognizable names left on the open market who could make positive contributions at the NHL level. Let’s take a look at the list and assess who’s most likely to succeed.
D Matt Grzelcyk – Believe it or not, Grzelcyk’s 40 points last season is tops among all remaining free agents. After spending eight seasons with the Boston Bruins, Grzelcyk signed a one-year deal with the Pittsburgh Penguins last offseason. After a slow start in Pittsburgh, Grzelcyk hit his stride and showcased his highest career point total despite scoring just one goal on the year. The 31-year-old left-shot defenseman should give a team a reliable option on a third pairing. In 527 career games, Grzelcyk has posted 175 points and a plus-131 rating. With a thinning market for blue liners remaining, he should find a new home soon.
F Jack Roslovic – Despite a 20-plus goal season last year, center Jack Roslovic is still searching for a new home. After signing a one-year deal with the Carolina Hurricanes last offseason, Roslovic posted 22 goals and 39 points on the year, while adding one goal and four points in nine playoff games. While Roslovic showcased an incredible turnaround in the faceoff circle with a 54.1 percent win rate (compared to his career average of 44.4), his 13:49 average ice time per game was his lowest since 2018-19. He also had a career-high 63 giveaways last season. While the Maple Leafs expressed interest in Roslovic earlier in free agency, the forward remains unsigned.
F Victor Olofsson – While Olofsson struggled to stay healthy last season (a common theme for his career), the 29-year-old winger produced 15 goals and 29 points in 56 games for the Vegas Golden Knights. That put Olofsson on an 82-game pace of 22 goals and 42 points, which would have been the most he’s scored since notching his career-high 49 points in the 2021-22 season. He also chipped in two goals and four points in nine playoff games. Olofsson has produced three career 20-plus goal campaigns, including 28 with the Buffalo Sabres during the 2022-23 campaign. He could provide quality depth scoring, and perhaps even more if he stays healthy. The native of Sweden has played more than 72 games in a season just once (75 in 2022–23).
F Joel Kiviranta – While Kiviranta produced 16 goals in 79 games this season with the Colorado Avalanche, it far exceeded what he’s showcased throughout the rest of his NHL career. Last season, Kiviranta posted a 19 percent shooting percentage, nearly doubling his career average of 10.9 percent. With that said, he made the most of his career-high 12:31 average ice time, which included setting career highs in goals, assists, points, plus/minus rating, faceoff percentage, and blocked shots. However, the well dried up in the postseason, as Kiviranta went scoreless in seven games. In 298 career games, the 29-year-old Kiviranta has produced 35 goals and 60 points.
F Luke Kunin – The last remaining free agent who produced double digit goal scoring last season is Kunin, who lit the lamp 11 times in 63 games for the San Jose Sharks before being traded to the Columbus Blue Jackets at the deadline. While Kunin’s time in Colombus didn’t prove to be a good fit (zero points in 12 games), he has proven to be a quality physical presence throughout his eight-year career, and the 27-year-old has received interest from several teams during free agency.
F Robby Fabbri – When healthy, Fabbri has been a solid contributor throughout his nine-year NHL career. However, like Olofsson, Fabbri has struggled to stay on the ice. That was no different last season with the Anaheim Ducks, where Fabbri fought through knee surgery and a hand injury that took away nearly half his season. He ended up posting eight goals and 16 assists in 44 games. The 29-year-old does have four seasons of at least 15 goals under his belt but has never played more than 72 games in a season. In 442 career games, Fabbri has produced 106 goals and 216 points.
Let us know below which remaining free agent will make the most significant impact in the 2025-26 season.
Who Is The Best Remaining Free Agent?
-
Jack Roslovic 49% (876)
-
Matt Grzelcyk 25% (441)
-
Victor Olofsson 9% (163)
-
Robby Fabbri 6% (114)
-
Luke Kunin 4% (69)
-
Other 4% (62)
-
Joel Kiviranta 3% (46)
Total votes: 1,771
Did The Jets Do Enough This Summer?
The Winnipeg Jets were a powerhouse last year in the regular season, winning the Presidents’ Trophy thanks to a historic season from goaltender Connor Hellebuyck, who secured his third Vezina Trophy as well as the Hart Trophy. Unfortunately, Hellebuyck and the Jets ran out of steam in the playoffs and were ousted in the second round.
The Dallas Stars unceremoniously knocked them out in just six games after Winnipeg narrowly escaped the first round against St. Louis, scoring in the final second of Game 7 before winning in overtime. The Jets weren’t expected to finish as high as they did last season, and after the summer they’ve had, they probably face lower expectations next year.
So, the question is: has Winnipeg done enough this summer to stay competitive in the Western Conference?
On the surface, teams that lose one of their top players to free agency generally don’t come away with a better group. That is precisely where the Jets find themselves after forward Nikolaj Ehlers took his talents to the Carolina Hurricanes, signing a six-year $51MM contract.
With Ehlers out of the picture after many months of speculation that he’d move on due to a lack of ice time, the Jets quickly took action to replace the loss. Winnipeg opted to replace Ehlers’ offense by committee rather than with an individual move, which was probably not a choice, but rather a necessity given their limited options.
Winnipeg decided to dive into the free agent market and managed to put together a few promising options to compensate for the loss of Ehlers’ offense. Their first move was to re-sign 37-year-old Jonathan Toews to the NHL after a two-year hiatus due to health issues.
The Winnipeg native hasn’t played since the 2022-23 season, and it’s uncertain what kind of contribution the three-time Stanley Cup champion can deliver. The last time Toews played, he scored 15 goals and added 16 assists in 53 games, ending with a -31 rating.
Since he was dealing with health problems then, it’s unfair to judge his past performance or predict similar results going forward. Still, he hasn’t played in the NHL for two seasons and is now 37 years old. Few players ever make a triumphant return in their mid to late 30s after a long absence, with Mario Lemieux being a notable exception.
It’s a gamble for the Jets to rely on Toews returning to his best, but if he does, he could replace a significant part of the offense Winnipeg lost when Ehlers went South. However, if he doesn’t, the Jets still have the option to pivot and use some of their substantial cap space to bring in extra help during the season. Winnipeg has nearly $20MM available under the cap with four players left to sign, so they should be able to leave room for mid-season acquisitions.
On July 1, the Jets also signed veteran forward Tanner Pearson to a one-year, $1MM contract. Pearson was a durable player early in his career, but injuries over the years have derailed his play, and he is now a shadow of his former self.
He was a decent playmaker at one point, but has become a liability on the possession front in recent seasons. That said, he comes to Winnipeg cheaply and should be able to produce around 25 points in a bottom-six role.
His impact on the Jets’ offense will be minimal, but given the low cost, Winnipeg could do much worse. It’s hard to believe, but Pearson is just 32 and posted 12 goals and 15 assists last season in 78 games, so there’s still some gas left in the tank for this season with the Jets.
The Jets also handed out a matching one-year, $1MM contract to forward Cole Koepke after he established himself as a regular NHL player last season. In Boston, the 27-year-old Minnesota native scored 10 goals and seven assists in 73 games while averaging just over 11 minutes per game. He will produce very little offense, but should provide the Jets with a player on their fourth line who can skate, get physical, and play a low-event, stable game.
Finally, the Jets signed the player who could provide the most offense in Ehlers’ absence, and that is 35-year-old Gustav Nyquist. The Halmstad, Sweden native played for Nashville and Minnesota last season and saw his offensive production drop sharply, falling from 75 points in 2023-24 to just 28 points last season.
His decline is quite puzzling, as his underlying numbers were decent, but everything that could go wrong for him did go wrong. He is still a good passer and could put up better numbers with Winnipeg if given the chance to play alongside some stronger players.
Nyquist will likely finish next season with over 28 points but is unlikely to repeat his 75-point performance. If he can raise his game and reach around 50 points, that would be a big win for Winnipeg, which is paying him just $3.25MM next season on a one-year deal.
Ultimately, the Jets made a series of low-risk, short-term signings in hopes of catching lightning in a bottle. These stopgaps will hold things together for the Jets as they aim to build on the success of this past season.
It’s hard to predict whether Toews, Nyquist, Pearson, and Koepke will be enough to replace the loss of Ehlers, but if they are, the Jets could be just as good as last season. If not, Winnipeg can always consider an in-season trade to boost its lineup.
Photo by Kamil Krzaczynski-USA TODAY Sports
CBA Q&A: AHL/CHL Transfers, EBUGs, Preseason, LTIR, More
In conjunction with last week’s callout, PHR’s Josh Erickson is answering some reader-submitted questions about the new Memorandum of Understanding and adjustments to the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Some questions have been edited for clarity and style.
Mike_t – I’ve heard NHL teams can put a 19-year-old in the AHL starting next season or maybe the following season. Do you know if that is part of the new CBA?
Fargo Chipper – Does the CHL have to sign off on the reported eligibility of one 19-year-old player per team being allowed assignment to the AHL?
Starting with a bit of a two-fer here. You’re both onto something. Yes, it is part of the new MOU. Yes, the CHL will need to sign off on it before it happens. The exact text is that the NHL “will reopen its agreement with the CHL to seek to eliminate the mandatory return rule for 19-year-old Players.” The proposed modification allows teams to loan a single 19-year-old player who would otherwise be subject to the previous transfer agreement to the AHL.
As an aside, none of the changes outlined in the new MOU affect league operations for the 2025-26 season or the 2026 draft and free agency. The existing CBA/MOU combination remains valid through Sep. 15, 2026. Every modification laid out in the new MOU takes effect on that date.
blues1967 – What would be the pay scale for an EBUG, since they are expected to be ready for all 82 games? My understanding is their pay would NOT count against the salary cap, correct?
The second part of this question is the quickest to answer. An EBUG is not on the active roster or even signed to a standard NHL contract – that would prohibit them from serving as one, so they’re not considered for salary cap purposes, no.
The first is also pretty simple. Compensation for emergency backups wasn’t previously outlined in the CBA or previous MOUs, and that doesn’t change here. It is entirely up to the team to offer whatever compensation they see fit.
The MOU also stipulates that the EBUG “may also be employed by the Club in another capacity.” I imagine most teams will not “hire” a separate EBUG as a result and will instead give that responsibility to someone already in the organization, assuming they meet the new specific eligibility requirements, like a development coach who’s traveling with the team.
Those eligibility requirements are as follows, and I’ll paraphrase them as best as possible to get rid of the legalese:
- Can’t have previously played an NHL game under a standard contract, so previous EBUGs who have entered game action remain eligible,
- Can’t have played more than 80 professional hockey games,
- Can’t have played pro hockey in the last three seasons,
- Can’t have any other contractual obligation that would prevent them from honoring their EBUG responsibilities,
- Can’t be on another NHL team’s reserve list.
vincent k. mcmahon – So with the preseason now shortened to just four games with the upcoming CBA, do you think this will have any sort of effect on roster construction around that time? Also, do you see this affecting players who settle for a PTO?
I think the shortened preseason will have a minimal impact on roster construction, particularly for existing players under contract. However, it will have a more significant effect on players with PTO. I’ll address the remedies for this in a second.
As for contracted players, yes, it likely puts more emphasis on their regular-season play the previous year to fuel their candidacy for a roster spot and may result in more teams making decisions based on players they penciled into their lineup over the summer. Considering the fluidity of rosters in the NHL, I don’t see this as a significant impact in the big picture. If anything, it protects teams from perhaps rushing players who aren’t ready for NHL roles into them based on an impressive but small training camp/preseason sample size.
To clarify these new rules (beginning with the 2026-27 preseason), teams cannot schedule more than four preseason games during training camp, those games cannot start earlier than the fourth day of camp, and no one with at least 100 games played (or dressed for goaltenders) can dress for more than two preseason games.
Like I said, opening night roster spot “battles” are often overblown because NHL/AHL roster fluidity is generally vast, particularly with a rising cap. It’s the veteran PTO players who are getting disadvantaged because they now only have a two-game sample size. In contrast, they’d have previously skated in close to every matchup in a longer exhibition schedule.
To that end, the MOU introduces a new formal mid-season PTO agreement, allowing for the extension of an on-the-books tryout into the regular season at any point. That agreement does not permit the player to enter a regular-season game; however, it does essentially provide an exclusive 10-day training/practice window, during which the team has the first right of refusal on a contract if another club attempts to sign the player.
highflyballintorightfield – Can you confirm/correct/comment on this reading of the LTIR changes: 1. A team can replace a player on LTIR only with players of average-salary-or-less (that is, no replacing an injured star with an equivalent player) unless the injured player is deemed ineligible for the rest of the season, including playoffs. 2. In the playoffs, the season’s cap amount applies (with numerous counting rules for bonuses, retentions, etc., that I will assume make sense) to the 20-man roster for each game. 3. The teams or NHLPA can request a good-faith re-assessment of the playoff cap after two playoffs in use (2028).
I’ll go number-by-number on these:
- Correct, with a couple of caveats. Essentially, the maximum cap relief via in-season LTIR usage when the player is expected to return is limited to the league average salary for the prior campaign. If this rule were to take effect for 2025-26, the maximum LTIR relief per team would be $3.82MM, since that was the average salary for 2024-25. It will be higher when it takes effect for 2026-27, as the 2025-26 league-average salary is greater than that. Additionally, the injured player in question would be ineligible to dress in the regular season or playoffs, even if they’re medically cleared, if the team exceeded that relief threshold.
- Correct. Dead cap applies in full in the playoffs; the only difference is your healthy scratches don’t count.
- Mostly correct. They can have that discussion, but the current provisions are locked in through 2028-29. If they decide to scrap it entirely, that can’t happen until the 2030 playoffs.
KSHabs – What are your beliefs on A) How taxes affect contracts after the new CBA, B) Chances of new expansion teams and what divisions and expansion draft could look like, and C) Who is in line to succeed Bettman as he could likely retire within the next few years. Thanks!
None of the above, honestly. The state income tax “loophole,” if you even want to call it that, wasn’t discussed in this MOU. Status quo, no change.
This MOU also doesn’t discuss expansion, aside from players now receiving an additional $35,000 stipend unrelated to moving expenses, if claimed in an expansion draft (it’s unclear who pays this money). Expansion will remain directly tied to hockey-related revenue and the valuation of franchises. The league has a price they’ve set. If someone is willing to pay it and the league sees a viable market/situation, they’ll expand. As a result, there’s no indication as to whether or how expansion draft protection rules may change.
If you ask Bettman, he’ll say that speculation is unfounded. Realistically, he’s 73 years old. Deputy commissioner Bill Daly has been in that post for 20 years now and is 12 years younger than Bettman. It’s really hard not to see him ascending to the throne if he’s still working with the league when Bettman eventually retires.
Breaking Down The Direction Of The Ducks
The Ducks are still well under the salary cap ceiling, sitting about $29MM below the limit with four players left to sign to complete a 23-man roster (as per PuckPedia). While that’s certainly a lot of space under the cap, it’s not necessarily a positive sign, given how the Ducks have exhausted their salary cap space by signing and trading for high-priced veterans who are past their prime. A few years ago, the Ducks seemed poised for success, but they have made little progress in their rebuild, and if anything, their recent moves have hindered what could have been something special.
When Pat Verbeek became the general manager of the Ducks in February 2022, he knew the team was in the midst of a rebuild and aimed to make them a contender. He had a plan, and from a broad perspective, his approach to bring in veterans made sense to support younger players and a prospect pool ranked 12th, according to Scott Wheeler of The Athletic. The Ducks had been focusing on youth for a while and had some promising young players starting to get significant NHL minutes. Bringing in experienced players who had been there before would provide emerging stars like Trevor Zegras with a mentor figure to help them develop into skilled professionals.
The Ducks had a poor start to Verbeek’s tenure, falling further down the standings in 2022-23 with a 23-47-12 record to finish last in the Western Conference. On the ice, the Ducks finished 31st in the NHL in goals for and 32nd in goals against, with a -129-goal differential. The team’s performance can’t solely be blamed on Verbeek, who had only been in the role for a few months before summer 2022. However, his influence was evident in certain aspects of the team, particularly in the signings of a few free agents, some of whom were successful, while others were not.
Verbeek signed Frank Vatrano to a three-year deal in July 2022, which proved to be a great bargain. However, he also signed Ryan Strome to a five-year, $25MM contract. Strome has recorded 41 points in each of the last three seasons, but his below-average defensive metrics offset some of his offensive contributions. Defencemen John Klingberg and Nathan Beaulieu were also acquired that offseason and struggled to adjust to Anaheim’s lineup, posting some of the worst numbers of their careers. Klingberg was traded to Minnesota before the NHL Trade Deadline, and Beaulieu finished the season and has not played in the NHL since.
In the summer of 2023, Verbeek continued his trend of overestimating veterans by signing a couple of 33-year-old veterans, defenceman Radko Gudas and Alex Killorn. The Gudas signing was for three years at $4MM per season and was a sensible gamble given his abilities at the time. Gudas doesn’t put up points, but he has been reasonably practical, and rebuilding teams generally need to overpay in free agency. The Killorn signing, however, raised many eyebrows even though he was coming off a 64-point season with Tampa Bay. Killorn was signed to a four-year deal worth $25MM ($6.25MM annually) and has not come close to delivering enough value to justify his contract. That signing started a significant trend in Anaheim that continues today: overvaluing players’ past contributions.
Moving forward, Verbeek arguably made his best move in early 2024 when he acquired forward Cutter Gauthier from the Philadelphia Flyers in exchange for defenseman Jamie Drysdale and a second-round pick. That move was a significant victory for the Ducks, strengthening their pool of young players with star potential.
After the Gauthier trade, Verbeek went back to work adding high-priced veterans to the lineup, trading for defenseman Brian Dumoulin in July 2024, and then eventually making a head-scratching trade for Jacob Trouba in late 2024. The Dumoulin trade turned out to be good business, as he was later flipped to New Jersey at the Trade Deadline for a second-round pick and a prospect, but the Trouba deal never made sense and still looks like a mistake to this day. The New York Rangers not only managed to get out from beneath Trouba’s $8MM cap hit but also received some value from Anaheim, acquiring defenseman Urho Vaakanainen and a 2025 fourth-round pick. Trouba has value due to his physicality, ability to block shots, and willingness to get involved in transition; however, his mobility and turnovers are significant issues that have persisted in Anaheim, not to mention his hefty cap hit. Verbeek then followed up this trade by moving on from Cam Fowler in a deal with St. Louis, where he retained $2.5MM in salary. 
Continuing with his trend, Verbeek then acquired Chris Kreider from the Rangers along with a fourth-round pick, giving them another chance to move on from a bad contract. The Ducks sent back a third-round pick and the 2023 second-round pick (59th overall), Carey Terrance. The jury is still out on the Kreider move, and he remains a net-front presence who can still skate, but his numbers took a significant hit next season, and the Ducks are gambling on a 34-year-old with a lot of hard miles on his body to recapture his game. Kreider did have 22 goals last season, so it’s not impossible to imagine him providing value to the Ducks, but at $6.5MM per season for two more years, the Ducks overpaid for another veteran who may or may not work out.
Verbeek followed up this trade by moving Zegras for a second and fourth-round pick, in exchange for forward Ryan Poehling. While Poehling is quite suitable as a depth forward, the return felt disappointing for an injury-prone player with considerable offensive talent. Zegras has struggled with injuries over the past few seasons and may not work out in Philadelphia. However, for a team like the Ducks, which seems willing to gamble on veterans returning to form, it was unusual to see them sell low on a relatively young forward who could still bounce back.
Finally, you have the Ducks’ last handful of moves, which include trading goaltender John Gibson for Petr Mrazek (and two draft picks) as well as the signings of Mikael Granlund and Ville Husso. The Gibson trade was good business for Anaheim and moved them away from a player who had made headlines for the past couple of seasons, as his timeline didn’t match the one the Ducks were on. Acquiring Mrazek as part of the package was also reasonable, as it provided Anaheim with a temporary backup to play behind Lukas Dostal. What didn’t make sense was giving Husso two more years at $2.2MM per season, as he has been a below-average goaltender for the last three seasons and spent more time in the AHL last season than he did in the NHL. Now, the goaltender market was certainly weak this summer, but handing out that kind of contract to an AHL-level goalie to play in the minors is a major misfire.
Anaheim completed their free agent moves by signing forward Granlund to a three-year, $21MM contract. Granlund is a solid offensive player who can generate points and is a great passer. However, he is only two summers removed from being a salary cap dump in Pittsburgh and is nowhere near worth a $7MM price tag. He doesn’t contribute much defensively, but should boost their 30th-ranked offence.
Now, people will point to the veteran acquisitions and say that Anaheim has plenty of cap space, so it doesn’t matter if they spend money on players like Husso and Granlund. But the fact is that Anaheim was in a prime position to contend by now, yet they have made things worse by acquiring older, slower players who haven’t helped the younger ones so far.
Fans might also argue that Anaheim isn’t going to contend this year or next, so having these veterans on the books doesn’t affect the long-term strategy. However, Anaheim could have better utilized and weaponized its cap space to bring in younger players or acquire other assets by taking on teams’ bad contracts, similar to the strategy Pittsburgh has employed. There is nothing wrong with overpaying players during a rebuild, but eventually, the bill comes due. For Anaheim, it seems they are still paying that bill, and they might continue to do so for a few more seasons.
Photo by Danny Wild-Imagn Images