Big Hype Prospects: Zharovsky, Barlow, Nestrasil, Zajicek

Welcome to PHR’s Big Hype Prospects series. Like the MLB Trade Rumors series of the same name, we’re taking a look at the performances of top prospects from across the hockey world. We’ll look at drafted prospects who are rising, others who are struggling, and prospects for the upcoming draft who are notable.

Four Big Hype Prospects

Alexander Zharovsky, RW, Montreal Canadiens (Ufa Salavat Yulayev, KHL)
31 GP 11G 17A 28pts

The Montreal Canadiens are currently benefiting greatly from the nightly performances of star rookie Ivan Demidov, a hugely talented Russian winger with the kind of offensive ability that can dazzle fans on a nightly basis. Demidov’s excellent rookie season does not come as a huge surprise to most, as just last season he managed to lead his KHL team in scoring — a hugely impressive feat for an 18-year-old player.

And yet Demidov may not be the only Canadiens prospect to accomplish that feat. Zharovsky, the club’s top selection at the 2025 NHL Entry Draft, currently leads the KHL’s Ufa Salavat Yulayev in scoring with 28 points in 31 games. The next-highest scorer, veteran Jack Rodewald, has 25 points in 39 games. Just one other player on the team has reached the 20-point mark.

The fact that Demidov led SKA in scoring last season threatens to leave Canadiens fans somewhat jaded at the prospect of another youngster leading his KHL team in scoring. But they should be reminded that the KHL, Russia’s top professional league, is a circuit with a longstanding reputation of being notoriously difficult for teenage players to gain a foothold in. Demidov himself had to contend with this, sometimes finding himself in an extremely limited role in SKA’s lineup despite his obvious talent.

Zharovsky’s brilliant 2025-26 campaign thus far has served as a clear indication that the Canadiens likely nabbed a first-round caliber talent in the early portion of the second round of the draft. Zharovsky was one of the fastest-rising players of last year’s draft process. He barely registered on scouting radars early last season. NHL Central Scouting did not include him on their preliminary watch list last October, nor was he ranked in the midterm rankings in January. Central Scouting caught onto Zharovsky by the end of the season, ranking him No. 5 among international skaters in their final rankings.

Most public-facing outlets had Zharovsky ranked in the early to middle portion of the second round of the draft, as high as No. 35 (TSN’s Bob McKenzie) and as low as No. 49 (Corey Pronman of The Athletic). In his ranking, Pronman wrote that while Zharovsky’s MHL production “needs to be looked at with a grain of salt,” due to the fact that he managed those numbers “in the clear worst division in that league.” He finished writing Zharovsky “could be a bottom six wing,” but it’s clear the Canadiens disagreed.

In their media availability following the draft, the Canadiens’ co-directors of amateur scouting Nick Bobrov and Martin Lapointe indicated to the media that not only did they project Zharovsky as a future top-six winger, but they also had him ranked on their draft board inside the first round, right around the slot of the two first-round picks they ultimately dealt to the New York Islanders in the Noah Dobson trade.

While it’s still far too early to tell whether Zharovsky will live up to the Canadiens’ expectations or fall more in line with Pronman’s projection, the early returns have been extremely promising for Montreal. Just as he did in the MHL, Zharovsky’s KHL performance will likely be met with some skepticism due to the fact that the division Zharovsky plays in, the Chernyshev Division, is arguably the league’s weakest.

But it is nonetheless extremely impressive to see a winger of Zharovsky’s age lead his team in scoring in his rookie KHL campaign. Zharovsky was named a KHL All-Star and the league’s rookie of the month for October and November. He ranks second in scoring in the KHL among all players aged 22 and younger, behind only Chicago Blackhawks prospect Roman Kantserov, who is 21 years old. While we won’t know for some time whether Zharovsky will truly end up as the top-six offensive talent the Canadiens believe he can be, his progression at the moment has been highly encouraging.

Colby Barlow, RW, Winnipeg Jets (Manitoba Moose, AHL)
25 GP 2G 3A 5pts

Of the first 20 picks of the 2023 NHL Entry Draft, just four selected players have yet to make their NHL debut: No. 5 pick David Reinbacher (MTL), No. 14 pick Brayden Yager (PIT, traded to WPG), No. 18 pick Barlow (WPG), and No. 20 pick Eduard Sale (SEA). While the pace of a prospect’s development is no sure indicator of that player’s future NHL success, and it must be repeatedly emphasized that player development is not a linear process, it is still notable when a highly-drafted prospect begins to fall behind his peers.

In Barlow’s case, he appears to have fallen behind quite considerably. This is actually not the first time Barlow has appeared in the Big Hype Prospects series, as he also was covered in a September 2024 article written by colleague Gabe Foley. Foley correctly noted that Barlow was a lock to be traded from his OHL team at the time (the Owen Sound Attack) and expressed some hope that the expected OHL trade would provide Barlow with some much-needed momentum in his final year before turning pro.

While OHL trades provided a spark for other CHL first-rounders to have hugely productive final campaigns in junior hockey (Conor Geekie and Matthew Savoie were two names specifically referenced by Foley) that didn’t happen for Barlow, who scored 32 goals and 61 points in 62 games as a member of the Oshawa Generals.

While Barlow did score at a higher rate in the second half of the year, and did follow up the regular season with a stellar postseason run (33 points in just 21 games), it appears he hasn’t been able to translate that momentum into tangible production to start his pro career.

Barlow is now 25 games into his first full season in the AHL, and he’s managed just five points.

The 20-year-old has long been viewed as a potential NHL sniper, with his shot credited as one of his standout tools. Pronman wrote in August that “Barlow’s calling card is his shot” but noted that “his offensive inconsistency is a concern.”

Elite Prospects’ Lauren Kelly wrote around the same time that Barlow’s “playmaking showed significant growth” in Oshawa, and that the development “bodes well for his move to the AHL.”

Breaking down exactly why Barlow’s offensive momentum appears to have stalled at the AHL level isn’t a simple task. He does get to play with some talented linemates, currently skating alongside 2022 first-rounder Brad Lambert and 2021 second-rounder Nikita Chibrikov.

But neither Lambert nor Chibrikov have been particularly productive this season. Despite having linemates that are, on paper, of high quality, Barlow hasn’t had the chance to play all that much this season. He ranks last in average ice time per game among all Moose skaters with at least 20 games played this season.

Given Barlow’s struggles in his rookie AHL campaign and the Moose’s apparent reluctance to play him higher in the lineup on a regular basis, it could be that a change of scenery ends up the best outcome for both Barlow and Winnipeg.

Barlow has, without question, thus far failed to live up to the Jets’ investment of a first-round pick in him. And Barlow could argue that the Jets have similarly failed to give him the kind of high-minute AHL role that would allow him to build momentum early in his pro career.

As the Jets look to plot their way forward amidst a deeply disappointing 2025-26 NHL campaign, they could seek to acquire reinforcements for their NHL roster via trade. If they end up doing so, Barlow could be one of the top prospects the Jets elect to trade in one of those transactions.

Vaclav Nestrasil, RW, Chicago Blackhawks (UMass Amherst, NCAA)
18 GP 10G 10A 20pts

If there’s one single player archetype that is most widely coveted across the NHL, a strong argument could be made that it’s a forward who combines devastating size and physicality with a high level of offensive skill. Those players come few and far between, and when one manages to establish himself at the NHL level, there’s usually no shortage of teams trying to line up to acquire his services.

Selected No. 25 overall at the 2025 NHL Entry Draft, Nestrasil has a very real chance of becoming that kind of player at the NHL level. The 6’5″, 190-pound winger still has a ways to go in terms of his physical development to reach that point, but the start to his collegiate career has been extremely impressive.

The Blackhawks’ selection of Nestrasil No. 25 overall was met with some skepticism. The player managed only 42 points in 61 USHL contests as a member of the Muskegon Lumberjacks, which is below the typically expected level of production for a first-round pick.

Though Nestrasil’s 13 points in 14 playoff games did help Muskegon win the Clark Cup Championship, his eventual draft ranking varied wildly in the public sphere. The team at Elite Prospects ranked him No. 26 on their board, but most other outlets ranked him somewhere in the 35-45 range. He was even ranked as low as No. 65, by TSN’s Craig Button.

While most scouts commended Nestrasil’s energy level, non-stop motor, and ability to impact a game even when he couldn’t score, many questioned whether he’d be able to bring a level of consistent production that would justify the investment of a first-round draft choice.

Nestrasil’s first 18 games of college hockey have gone a long way towards addressing — but not permanently silencing — those skeptics. He has managed 10 goals and 18 points, good for second on the team behind undrafted 22-year-old Jack Musa.

Because other freshmen players are also having an incredible start to their NCAA career (Pittsburgh Penguins 2025 first-rounder Will Horcoff has 19 goals in his first 20 games, for example), Nestrasil’s sharp improvement in offensive production over last season has flown more under the radar than it perhaps deserves to. But if any Blackhawks fans decide to tune into Amherst games this season, it’s possible they could be watching a long-term linemate for franchise face Connor Bedard.

The team is still searching for long-term pieces to pair Bedard with, and Nestrasil’s compete level, size, physicality, and offensive touch could complement the star center quite well. There’s still a ways to go before Nestrasil reaches that point, but so far in his NCAA career, Nestrasil’s stock appears to be rapidly rising.

Simon Zajicek, G, Boston Bruins (Providence Bruins, AHL)
12 GP  10-1-1, .934 sv% /1.93 GAA

The history of free agent imports from European professional leagues is a spotty one. Where there have been teams that have found considerable success bringing over star players from top European pro circuits, others have seen their investments flame out and quickly return to the other side of the Atlantic. For every Karel Vejmelka or Alexander Radulov there appears to be five Jan Kovar‘s or Jakub Jerabek‘s.

The Bruins have traded away a considerable number of draft picks over the last half-decade as a result of the organization’s push to win the Stanley Cup within that time frame. Those moves have depleted the Bruins’ prospect pool, and left their scouts with fewer resources at their disposal to replenish that pool of prospects.

One route organizations in that sort of a position often take to try to maintain a pipeline of young players despite having fewer draft picks is signing free agent players from the NCAA, the CHL, or the European pro circuit. Edmonton Oilers GM Stan Bowman is an example of a hockey operations executive that has been aggressive in his targeting of European free agents, and he had some success doing so with the Chicago Blackhawks, landing long-term NHL players such as Antti Raanta, Erik Gustafsson, and most notably, Artemi Panarin.

The Bruins appeared to try to replicate his approach this past summer when they signed Zajicek, a netminder from the Czech Extraliga. In his age-23 season, Zajicek led the Extraliga in save percentage, putting up a .930 mark across 29 games played. The year prior, he posted a .909 save percentage across 20 games for HC Litvínov.

Zajicek was signed to form a tandem with AHL star Michael DiPietro, and despite his inexperience in North American pro hockey, Zajicek has been stellar to start his AHL career. Through 12 games, Zajicek has gone 10-1-1 with a .934 save percentage. His performance, along with the strong performances of DiPietro, have helped Providence rank No. 2 in the AHL in fewest goals surrendered so far in 2025-26.

While it’s too early to tell whether Zajicek’s performance is truly a reflection of a promising NHL future or more of a product of a high-quality defensive environment around him, his stellar form to start the year does suggest that he may end up making a push for an NHL role in Boston or somewhere where there is more of a pressing need for goaltending.

Photos courtesy of Perry Nelson-Imagn Images

2025-26 In-Season NHL Trades

Pro Hockey Rumors will keep track of all trades made during the 2025-26 campaign, right up until the last day of the regular season, updating this post with each transaction.

Trades are listed here in reverse-chronological order, with the latest at the top. So, if a player has been traded multiple times, the first team listed as having acquired him is the one that ended up with him. If a trade has not yet been formally finalized, it will be listed in italics. The terms or structures of those deals could still change before they’re officially completed.

For our full story on each trade, click on the date above it. We’ll continue to update this list with the latest specific details on picks and other compensation, as they’re reported.

You can reference this post under the “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” menu on the right sidebar on desktop or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu.

Here’s the full list of the NHL’s 2025-26 in-season trades:


February 24

February 24

February 4

  • Kings acquire F Artemi Panarin.
  • Rangers acquire F Liam Greentree, a conditional 2026 third-round pick, and a conditional 2028 fourth-round pick.
    • Conditions: The Rangers will receive the better of the Kings’ or the Stars’ 2026 third-round pick. The selection will upgrade to the Kings’ 2026 second-round pick if L.A. wins at least one playoff round. The Kings’ 2028 fourth-round pick will only transfer if they win at least two playoff rounds in 2026.

February 4

  • Devils acquire F Nick Bjugstad.
  • Blues acquire F Thomas Bordeleau and a conditional 2026 fourth-round pick.
    • Condition: the Blues will receive the latest of the Devils’, Stars’ or Jets’ 2026 fourth-round pick.

February 2

  • Stars acquire D Jeremie Poirier.
  • Flames acquire D Gavin White.

January 27

  • Islanders acquire F Ondřej Palát, the Devils’ 2026 third-round pick, and the Devils’ 2027 sixth-round pick.
  • Devils acquire F Maxim Tsyplakov.

January 26

  • Islanders acquire D Carson Soucy.
  • Rangers acquire the Islanders’ 2026 third-round pick.

January 24

January 20

January 19

  • Sharks acquire F Kiefer Sherwood.
  • Canucks acquire D Cole Clayton, the Sharks’ 2026 second-round pick, and the Sharks’ 2027 second-round pick.

January 18

  • Golden Knights acquire D Rasmus Andersson (50% retained).
  • Flames acquire D Zach Whitecloud, the Golden Knights’ 2027 first-round pick, a conditional 2027 second-round pick, and the signing rights to D Abram Wiebe.
    • Condition: The 2027 second-round pick will upgrade to Vegas’ 2028 first-round pick if they win the Stanley Cup in 2026.

January 16

  • Hurricanes acquire D Kyle Masters and the Sharks’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
  • Sharks acquire the Blackhawks’ 2027 fifth-round pick.

January 16

  • Ducks acquire F Jeffrey Viel.
  • Bruins acquire the Flyers’ or Red Wings’ 2026 fourth-round pick.
    • Condition: The Bruins will acquire the highest of the two available draft selections.

January 8

  • Sharks acquire D Nolan Allan, G Laurent Brossoit, and the Blackhawks’ 2028 seventh-round pick.
  • Blackhawks acquire D Ryan Ellis, D Jake Furlong, and the Sharks’ 2028 fourth-round pick.

January 6

  • Hurricanes acquire D Juuso Välimäki.
  • Mammoth acquire future considerations.

December 31

December 29

  • Penguins acquire RW Yegor Chinakhov.
  • Blue Jackets acquire LW Danton Heinen, the Blues’ 2026 second-round pick, and the Capitals’ 2027 third-round pick.

December 28

December 19

  • Blue Jackets acquire LW Mason Marchment.
  • Kraken acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2027 second-round pick and the Rangers’ 2026 fourth-round pick.

December 19

  • Canadiens acquire C Phillip Danault.
  • Kings acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2026 second-round pick.

December 12

December 12

December 12

  • Oilers acquire D Spencer Stastney.
  • Predators acquire the Oilers’ 2027 third-round pick.

Read more

Players On 2026 World Juniors Rosters By NHL Team

This year’s World Juniors kick off in just over an hour with a Group A clash between Sweden and Slovakia in St. Paul. With all 10 countries’ rosters locked in, it’s time to look at which prospects each NHL team will see representing them on the world’s biggest stage for under-20 players.

Only three teams – the Blue Jackets, Golden Knights, and Hurricanes – do not have a representative on an opening roster. The Mammoth and Predators lead the way with seven prospects each, while the Canadiens, Capitals, Ducks, Flyers, Islanders, Red Wings, and Sharks are other teams with five-plus.

Anaheim Ducks

Boston Bruins

Buffalo Sabres

Calgary Flames

Carolina Hurricanes

none

Chicago Blackhawks

Read more

PHR Mailbag: Kraken, Player Development, Blackhawks, Bad Contracts, Flyers

Topics in this edition of the PHR Mailbag include which of Seattle’s pending UFAs could be on the move, if some Chicago prospects could join the team this season, and more.  If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in our last two mailbag columns.

yeasties: The Kraken appear to be positioned well to be a deadline seller. Assuming they sputter out and become sellers, which of their pending UFAs do you think will be dealt and who will be kept and extended?

For those who aren’t too familiar with Seattle’s pending UFA list, it’s quite a big one, even after they moved Mason Marchment to Columbus on Friday before the roster freeze.  Up front, they have Jaden Schwartz, Jordan Eberle, and Eeli Tolvanen all set to hit the market in July.  They also have Jamie Oleksiak on the back end and since goaltender Matt Murray has been in the NHL all season, I’ll give him a mention here as well although I wouldn’t be shocked if he doesn’t get re-signed or traded by the early-March trade deadline.

Oleksiak is the one I’m most confident in saying will be moved.  His role on the depth chart has been reduced and it’s hard to imagine they’ll want to sign him to another multi-year deal around this price point.  On the other hand, teams want big defensemen with some snarl at the deadline and Oleksiak provides that.  Despite being in the midst of a down year, I expect they’ll get a strong market for his services.

Up front, I’d put Schwartz as the most likely to be dealt.  He has had some good moments when healthy (including this season) but he can’t stay healthy.  However, with salary retention, some contender will want him as a middle-six upgrade to bolster their offensive depth and maybe play on the power play.  On the flip side, I think Eberle stays.  Yes, he could go be a middle-six player somewhere but I think they’ll want to keep him around, assuming a reasonable extension could be worked out.

I could see Seattle taking a run at re-signing Tolvanen.  He isn’t having a great year so maybe they look to try to get him at a lower-market rate.  Failing that, he still has enough of a track record that there should be some teams that like him as more of a depth addition.

frozenaquatic: I hear a lot about prospect development with how bad the team I root for (the Rangers) is at it. I had heard that Tanner Glass and Jed Ortmeyer, two plugs, were in charge of “player development,” but saw some folks talking about how that just meant they were in charge of making sure prospects had proper housing and resources to financial management and things like that, and that they weren’t really coaches. I always hear the refrain that the “NHL isn’t a development league” in the sense that coaches aren’t expected to coddle young players (unless they’re in a full rebuild).

My question is: if a team has “bad player development,” is that more on the Department of Player Development, the scouts, the AHL coaches? Maybe even the skills coach? Let’s say, for instance, the Rangers wanted to get better at “player development” overall. Would that be an overhaul of the scouting department to look for different baseline skills in players? Or something else? I’m thinking of how Laf, Kakko, Kravtsov, Andersson, etc all panned out–is that just horrible scouting, terrible luck, or the mysterious player development?

In recent years, it feels like a lot of teams are adding Player Development coaches.  But most of the time, those are recently retired players.  It feels like these positions are created to give them a chance to see if a coaching position is something they might be interested in.  Meanwhile, they get to relay some pointers to the prospects and help them along.  From a starting point, that’s not a bad thing to have and it does allow those former players to slowly improve those coaching skills.  Ideally, you might want to have someone (or more) who can work on more specialized training for each player to maximize those efforts but Glass and Ortmeyer can certainly be part of a quality department.

As for where the blame might lie when it comes to a lack of proper player development, there’s plenty to go around.  The scouts may have misread the projectability of certain skills although I won’t critique them for the first two on that list as they were largely consensus picks at where they were selected.  Did the Player Development department work enough with the players?  I’d lump the skills coaches into that area in terms of coming up with the proper training regimens.  Then you have the coaching staffs at both the AHL and NHL levels.  Yes, the NHL is not a development league in theory but the reality is, a lot of development does happen at the top level.  Some of it also has to fall on the players.  Some train better than others over the offseason, some are more dedicated to the finer points of development.  I’m speaking generally here, not talking specifically about any of the players you listed.

There’s no simple fix or overhaul here.  Scouts can be evaluated based on their reports; did those players progress over time?  Keep the best ones and if there are some who haven’t been as strong, then you could look to make a change.  The same goes in the development department (more teams seem to be drifting toward adding more people rather than changing some) and with the coaching staffs although they have to balance winning and development at the same time.  In a perfect world, it’s probably a slow build over making a bunch of changes all at once.

Unclemike1526: Do you know when the KHL and SHL seasons end? Frondell will definitely be here after that and depending on whether the Hawks still have a shot at the Playoffs and could play more than 10 games and burn his 1st year of his ELC. Kantserov is not eligible for an ELC but hopefully comes over here and could help also. I doubt the Hawks will let Frondell play more than 10 games if they’re out of it entirely. They could use his size either on the wing or even at C. What do you think?

The KHL regular season ends on March 20th while the SHL ends on March 14th.  Also worth noting, last year, the KHL playoffs ended on May 21st and the SHL ended on May 1st.

Chicago has fallen off a bit since the callout for questions and are now hovering near the bottom of the league and don’t have Connor Bedard.  As things stand, I don’t think the playoffs are a realistic possibility.  However, there’s an outside shot that Anton Frondell could get in a game or two depending on how Djurgardens fares in the playoffs.  There probably won’t be more than ten games left by then so they’re not at risk of burning a year of his entry-level deal.

Roman Kantersov is actually eligible for an entry-level contract as he’s only 21.  It will just be a two-year pact instead of three.  But it might not matter anyway as Magnitogorsk is the top team in the league and likely heading for a long playoff run.  If they went out early enough, it’s possible they’d sign him and burn a year now.  They wouldn’t want to do that but that might be needed to convince him to sign, knowing he could exit the entry-level restrictions a year earlier.  I wouldn’t expect that to come into play but we’ll see what happens in the playoffs.

tucsontoro: Brian – we’re already hearing lots of chatter on who might be on the move. What do you consider the worst contracts in the league right now?

I don’t think the players on the worst contracts in the league are probably going to be on the move but let’s go over some of the bad ones.

Jonathan Huberdeau’s contract with Calgary has to be here.  Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t hate the trade for the Flames at the time it was made.  Getting what we thought was still a top-line winger and a strong defenseman wasn’t a bad return for Matthew Tkachuk.  Of course, Huberdeau is being paid like his best year with Florida while producing about half of the points, making it a well-above-market deal.  There’s a temptation to put Elias Pettersson here on the first year of his new contract but let’s let the season play out and see how he fares as the undisputed top player in Vancouver now.

On the back end, Darnell Nurse is being paid as an elite two-way defender.  He hasn’t been that.  Offensively, he’s more of a third option with them needing to pay to bring in Jake Walman to pick up some of the secondary slack since Nurse wasn’t producing.  Defensively, elite is not the word I would use.  He’s a serviceable top-four defender, sure, but not a number one like he’s being paid as.  On the lower end of the scale, Ryan Graves started the season in the minors after clearing waivers and is now a sixth or seventh option on most nights.  He still has three years left at $4.5MM and even if the Penguins retained the maximum 50%, there still wouldn’t be a trade market for him.

Now, since you referenced this question after mentioning chatter about players who could be on the move, I wanted to think of some bad contracts that could be dealt.  One that comes to mind is Barclay Goodrow.  He’s on an expiring deal at $3.64MM and is a fourth liner.  However, he’s the type of gritty role player some teams will covet and if there’s one with a lot of cap space, I could see him moving.  I’m also wondering about Patrik Laine ($8.7MM, pending UFA) in Montreal.  Since they’ve gone and added Alexandre Texier and Phillip Danault, is there a spot for him when the team is fully healthy?  If not, it wouldn’t shock me to see them try to move him with half retention to give him a chance to play down the stretch and help his case in free agency.  The return would be minimal but after blowing through their remaining room to add Danault, clearing half of Laine’s deal would give them some extra flexibility.

Emoney123: What’s the next move for Danny Briere? Seems Martone, Nesbitt, Luchanko, Bump, Barkey, and Bjarnason are a few years away and with only their own #1 pick this year, how does Briere keep the Flyers in the playoff hunt? Seen this before with big crash and burn late in the second half of the season. Rick Tocchet for Coach of the Year if the Flyers make playoffs?

Right now, the next move is likely patience.  At the moment, Philadelphia is right in the thick of the playoff race, one that no one seems to be making a push to run away with.  It’s great that they’re in it right now but will they still be in the hunt at the Olympic break?  I think that’s going to be the decision point for a lot of teams as to whether to buy, sell, or largely stand pat and the Flyers should be one of those.

If I’m being honest, I’m not sold on them being a viable playoff threat.  A bunch of overtime games have kept them in the mix which is fine but not necessarily sustainable over the course of a full season.  Accordingly, my inclination is that they largely hold or sell a bit, depending on if they can get Christian Dvorak signed to a contract extension or not in the new year.

That said, you asked me about a playoff scenario so there are two buying scenarios I can think of.  One I’ve written about in an older mailbag column and that’s one that sees them buying low on someone who could be around beyond the season.  In other words, another Trevor Zegras type of move where you’re hoping a change of scenery gets them going while knowing that a futures payment is justifiable given that the player isn’t a rental.  That’s still on the table.

The other one is where they’re a soft buyer and basically tell teams that they’ll take a contract off their hands.  With double retention off the table now, other buyers will need to move some bodies out to make the money work for other trades.  This is a good spot for GM Daniel Briere to tell teams that they can facilitate one of those moves by taking an expiring contract back.  Ideally, the player is a forward with a bit of offensive upside.  Frankly, the Laine scenario I mentioned above feels like something worthwhile doing in this instance, flipping a minor leaguer or futures in return.  It’s something that doesn’t jeopardize the future and sends a message to the players that they’re not giving up.  It’s not the route I’d probably go but if they’re buying, I think it’s going to be low-cost acquisitions that don’t jeopardize the future.

Read more

NHL Players Who Can Veto Trades In 2025-26

Trade and movement protection is becoming increasingly common in the NHL. There are three forms. A no-movement clause, in addition to giving the player the right to veto any trade, allows them to block waiver placements and subsequent minor-league reassignments as well. No-trade clauses are the simplest, giving the player full veto power over a trade, but also the rarest.

The most common form of trade protection is the modified no-trade clause, which allows a player to submit a list of teams they can or can’t be traded to. An M-NTC can also include kicker dates that change the level of protection the player has. Most every team has at least one of these on their books.

To be eligible for an NMC, NTC, or M-NTC, the player must be at least 27 years old at the beginning of the league year or have accumulated seven years of service – in other words, the same requirements for unrestricted free agency.

With those criteria in mind, here are the players who must give their consent to some degree if their teams want to trade them during the 2025-26 league year. Players with M-NTCs have the amount of teams they can block a trade to in parentheses (with noted exceptions for rare ‘yes’ or approved trade lists).


Anaheim Ducks

No-movement clauses: none

No-trade clauses:

Modified no-trade clauses:

Boston Bruins

No-movement clauses:

No-trade clauses:

Modified no-trade clauses:

Buffalo Sabres

No-movement clauses:

No-trade clauses: none

Modified no-trade clauses:

Read more

2027 NHL Free Agents

Pro Hockey Rumors’ up-to-date list of 2027 free agents is below. These are players who are eligible for restricted or unrestricted free agency after the 2026-27 season. The player’s 2027 age is in parentheses.

Players who are currently free agents or on our 2026 free agent list are not shown here. Players who have team or player options for the 2026/27 season aren’t listed below, but will be added to this list eventually if they remain on their current contracts.

This list will be continually updated. You’ll be able to access it anytime under the “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” menu on the right sidebar on our desktop site, or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu. If you have any corrections or omissions, please get in touch with us.

Updated Jan. 15, 2025 (11:12 a.m. CT)


Unrestricted Free Agents

Centers

Left Wingers

Right Wingers

Left-Shot Defensemen

Right-Shot Defensemen

Goaltenders


Restricted Free Agents

Centers

Left Wingers

Right Wingers

Left-Shot Defensemen

Right-Shot Defensemen

Goaltenders

Assessing The Kraken’s Goaltending Situation

The Kraken entered the break on a strong note with three straight wins, but they’ve only won four of their last 14 games. Thanks to many of their tweener companions in the West struggling, they’re only three points out of a playoff spot with four games in hand on the Mammoth.

Seattle isn’t a surefire playoff team by any stretch at a record of 15-14-6, but given the level of goaltending they’ve received thus far from Joey Daccord, Philipp Grubauer and Matt Murray, they should be able to at least stay in the mix until the trade deadline. Seattle’s issue has clearly been its offense this year, which ranks third-last in the league at 2.54 goals per game. On the defensive side, Seattle’s 2.97 goals against per game rank 13th.

Earlier in 2025, two NHL contracts that seemed unmovable were those of Grubauer and Tristan Jarry. Jarry was dealt to the Oilers earlier this month after passing through waivers a year ago. However, his play this year opened the door for the Penguins to move him and his entire $5.375MM cap hit, even though it had another two years after this one.

Something that seemed impossible a year ago happened, and the Penguins netted two roster players and a second-round pick. The trade highlighted the limited goaltending options available across the NHL, which brings us to the Kraken and, specifically, Grubauer.

The 34-year-old has been a disaster since signing with Seattle as a free agent in 2021. The Stanley Cup winner signed a six-year deal worth $5.9MM annually, and he has never been able to give the Kraken anything close to the goaltending he provided to the Avalanche in his few seasons as their starter.

Grubauer was a Vezina Trophy finalist in his platform season, finishing third, and posted a 30-9-1 record with a .922 SV% and a 1.95 GAA. As impressive as those numbers were, his underlying numbers painted a clearer picture, minimizing Grubauer’s overall impact and suggesting a goaltender playing behind an excellent team. Grubauer still had to stop the saveable pucks and avoid the bad goals, and that’s precisely what he did, but he only registered 5.2 goals saved above expected (as per MoneyPuck), 11th in the league.

Fast-forward to that summer, when Seattle thought they were getting a netminder capable of backstopping them on deep playoff runs. Now, his contract has become one of, if not the, least movable agreements in the NHL, until perhaps this season.

Grubauer has started the season well, even though traditional metrics don’t necessarily reflect it. He has played 11 games this season, going 5-3-1 with a .911 SV% and a 2.59 GAA. Those numbers are nothing to write home about, but a deeper dive shows that Grubauer has 7.1 goals saved above expected on the year – the best figure on the Kraken.

That great start to the season could give Seattle the chance to move him, if he agrees. Grubauer has a modified no-trade clause in his contract, which further complicates a trade even if Seattle were able to find a dance partner.

To add to an already complicated dynamic, the third-string Murray is injured. Unfortunately, injuries have derailed a career that once looked incredibly bright. That said, when Murray returns to the lineup, the Kraken will presumably have three capable NHL goaltenders and will need to move one or assign one to the AHL.

This is where it gets really complicated. Losing Grubauer for Murray is a lateral move at this point, but is Seattle really willing to roll the dice with Murray as the backup? Hard to say, but talent-wise, Murray is more than capable, and the risk of moving Grubauer might just be worth it if it means shedding his massive contract, especially if the Kraken remain out of the playoff picture.

It’s not dissimilar to what the Penguins had to do to shed Jarry’s contract. They took back Stuart Skinner and are rolling with him and Arturs Silovs, but the big win is not having Jarry’s money on the books, which opens the door for Pittsburgh to do a lot next summer. Seattle could put itself in a similar spot if it moved all of Grubauer’s deal, which would bring it to $40MM in available cap room for 2026-27 with just six players to sign (as per PuckPedia)

Seattle has already begun selling off free agents, as evidenced by the Mason Marchment trade to the Blue Jackets, and is signalling that it plans to punt on this season. Murray is a pending free agent, but even if Seattle were to trade the two-time Stanley Cup Champion, it wouldn’t get much for him given his play in previous seasons and his long injury history. The Kraken’s best course of action is to try to move Grubauer for something, anything really, to clear the books and make some bigger moves next summer.

Now, teams are obviously desperate for goaltending, but that doesn’t mean Seattle can move all of Grubauer’s contract. They should be able to move half or more, but they have to do it soon, so his play doesn’t fall back to the level it was at in the last few seasons. They also need to be concerned that a team like Pittsburgh tries to move Skinner, which would further diminish Seattle’s trading partners.

2026 NHL Free Agents By Team

Pro Hockey Rumors’ up-to-date list of 2026 free agents by team is below. These are players who are eligible for restricted or unrestricted free agency after the 2025-26 season.

Restricted free agents are marked with (RFA). Potential Group VI unrestricted free agents are marked with the games played total they need to reach to be eligible for RFA status, if attainable. Players not currently on a team’s active roster, injured reserve, non-roster list, or buried list are not listed.

This list will continue to be updated throughout the 2025-26 season, so be sure to use it and our list of 2026 free agents by position/type as points of reference. Players are ordered by expiry status and cap hit.

Both lists can be found anytime under “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” on the right-hand sidebar of our desktop site, or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu. If you have any corrections or omissions, please contact us.

Updated Feb. 16, 2026 (12:40 p.m. CT)


Anaheim Ducks

  1. Jacob Trouba
  2. Petr Mrázek
  3. Radko Gudas
  4. Ryan Poehling
  5. LW Ross Johnston
  6. Jansen Harkins
  7. LW Cutter Gauthier (RFA)
  8. Leo Carlsson (RFA)
  9. Ian Moore (RFA)
  10. Pavel Mintyukov (RFA)
  11. Olen Zellweger (RFA)

Boston Bruins

  1. RW Viktor Arvidsson
  2. Andrew Peeke
  3. LW Jeffrey Viel
  4. LW Matěj Blümel (Group VI)
  5. Michael Callahan (Group VI)
  6. Jordan Harris (RFA)
  7. Vladislav Kolyachonok (RFA)

Buffalo Sabres

  1. RW Alex Tuch
  2. LW Beck Malenstyn
  3. Jacob Bryson
  4. Joshua Dunne
  5. Peyton Krebs (RFA)
  6. Michael Kesselring (RFA)
  7. LW Zach Benson (RFA)
  8. LW Isak Rosen (RFA)

Calgary Flames

  1. Rasmus Andersson
  2. LW Ryan Lomberg
  3. Jake Bean
  4. Justin Kirkland
  5. Daniil Miromanov
  6. John Beecher (RFA)

Carolina Hurricanes

  1. Frederik Andersen
  2. Mike Reilly
  3. Mark Jankowski
  4. Alexander Nikishin (RFA)

Chicago Blackhawks

  1. Shea Weber
  2. LW Nick Foligno
  3. Connor Murphy
  4. Jason Dickinson
  5. RW Ilya Mikheyev
  6. Laurent Brossoit
  7. RW Sam Lafferty
  8. Matt Grzelcyk
  9. Connor Bedard (RFA)
  10. Ethan Del Mastro (RFA)
  11. LW Colton Dach (RFA)

Colorado Avalanche

  1. LW Victor Olofsson
  2. LW Joel Kiviranta
  3. Brent Burns
  4. Ilya Solovyov (Group VI)
  5. Jack Drury (RFA)
  6. Zakhar Bardakov (RFA)

Columbus Blue Jackets

  1. Charlie Coyle
  2. LW Mason Marchment
  3. Erik Gudbranson
  4. Boone Jenner
  5. Ivan Fedotov
  6. Brendan Smith
  7. LW Zach Aston-Reese
  8. Brendan Gaunce
  9. Cole Sillinger (RFA)
  10. LW Yegor Chinakhov (RFA)
  11. Adam Fantilli (RFA)
  12. Jet Greaves (RFA)

Dallas Stars

  1. LW Jamie Benn
  2. RW Nathan Bastian
  3. Kyle Capobianco
  4. LW Adam Erne
  5. Alexander Petrovic
  6. LW Jason Robertson (RFA)
  7. Nils Lundkvist (RFA)
  8. Mavrik Bourque (RFA)

Detroit Red Wings

  1. RW Patrick Kane
  2. Cam Talbot
  3. Justin Holl
  4. Travis Hamonic
  5. LW James van Riemsdyk
  6. Erik Gustafsson
  7. LW John Leonard
  8. Simon Edvinsson (RFA)
  9. Jacob Bernard-Docker (RFA)

Edmonton Oilers

  1. Adam Henrique
  2. RW Jack Roslovic
  3. RW Kasperi Kapanen
  4. David Tomasek
  5. Connor Ingram
  6. LW Max Jones
  7. Calvin Pickard
  8. Curtis Lazar
  9. Noah Philp
  10. Spencer Stastney (RFA)

Florida Panthers

  1. Sergei Bobrovsky
  2. Daniil Tarasov
  3. LW A.J. Greer
  4. Jeff Petry
  5. RW Luke Kunin
  6. Tomáš Nosek
  7. LW Noah Gregor
  8. Jack Studnicka
  9. RW Cole Schwindt (Group VI – needs 33 GP this season for RFA)
  10. RW Mackie Samoskevich (RFA)
  11. Donovan Sebrango (RFA)

Los Angeles Kings

  1. Anže Kopitar
  2. LW Andrei Kuzmenko
  3. RW Corey Perry
  4. Pheonix Copley
  5. Jacob Moverare
  6. LW Jeff Malott
  7. Brandt Clarke (RFA)

Minnesota Wild

  1. RW Vladimir Tarasenko
  2. RW Mats Zuccarello
  3. Zach Bogosian
  4. LW Marcus Johansson
  5. RW Vinnie Hinostroza
  6. David Jiříček (RFA)
  7. Daemon Hunt (RFA)

Montreal Canadiens

  1. LW Patrik Laine
  2. LW Sammy Blais
  3. Kirby Dach (RFA)
  4. Arber Xhekaj (RFA)
  5. Joe Veleno (RFA)
  6. RW Zachary Bolduc (RFA)

 Nashville Predators

  1. LW Michael Bunting
  2. Erik Haula
  3. LW Cole Smith
  4. Michael McCarron
  5. Nick Blankenburg
  6. LW Tyson Jost
  7. Justin Barron (RFA)
  8. Fedor Svechkov (RFA)

New Jersey Devils

  1. RW Evgenii Dadonov
  2. Juho Lammikko
  3. Dennis Cholowski
  4. Luke Glendening
  5. RW Zack MacEwen
  6. Colton White
  7. LW Arseny Gritsyuk (RFA)
  8. Simon Nemec (RFA)
  9. LW Paul Cotter (RFA)

New York Islanders

  1. LW Anders Lee
  2. Jean-Gabriel Pageau
  3. Carson Soucy
  4. Tony DeAngelo
  5. David Rittich
  6. RW Max Shabanov (RFA)
  7. Marc Gatcomb (RFA)
  8. Adam Boqvist (RFA)
  9. Marshall Warren (RFA)

New York Rangers

  1. Jonathan Quick
  2. RW Jonny Brodzinski
  3. LW Conor Sheary
  4. Braden Schneider (RFA)
  5. Scott Morrow (RFA)
  6. LW Brett Berard (RFA)
  7. LW Brennan Othmann (RFA)

Ottawa Senators

  1. Nick Jensen
  2. LW David Perron
  3. RW Claude Giroux
  4. Lars Eller
  5. LW Nick Cousins
  6. James Reimer
  7. Jordan Spence (RFA)
  8. Leevi Merilainen (RFA)
  9. Stephen Halliday (RFA)

Philadelphia Flyers

  1. LW Carl Grundström
  2. LW Nicolas Deslauriers
  3. Noah Juulsen
  4. Rodrigo Abols
  5. Trevor Zegras (RFA)
  6. Jamie Drysdale (RFA)
  7. RW Bobby Brink (RFA)
  8. Samuel Ersson (RFA)
  9. Emil Andrae (RFA)
  10. LW Nikita Grebenkin (RFA)
  11. RW Philip Tomasino (RFA)

Pittsburgh Penguins

  1. Evgeni Malkin
  2. Kevin Hayes
  3. Connor Clifton
  4. Brett Kulak
  5. LW Anthony Mantha
  6. Stuart Skinner
  7. Mathew Dumba
  8. LW Danton Heinen
  9. Noel Acciari
  10. Connor Dewar
  11. Ryan Shea
  12. Arturs Silovs (RFA)
  13. LW Ville Koivunen (RFA)
  14. Egor Zamula (RFA)

San Jose Sharks

  1. Carey Price
  2. John Klingberg
  3. Nick Leddy
  4. Mario Ferraro
  5. Timothy Liljegren
  6. LW Jeff Skinner
  7. Alex Nedeljkovic
  8. Vincent Desharnais
  9. RW Ryan Reaves
  10. Ty Dellandrea (RFA)
  11. RW Philipp Kurashev (RFA)
  12. Shakir Mukhamadullin (RFA)
  13. RW Collin Graf (RFA)
  14. Zack Ostapchuk (RFA)
  15. Vincent Iorio (RFA)

Seattle Kraken

  1. LW Jaden Schwartz
  2. RW Jordan Eberle
  3. Jamie Oleksiak
  4. LW Eeli Tolvanen
  5. Matt Murray
  6. Ben Meyers
  7. RW Ryan Winterton (RFA)
  8. RW Jacob Melanson (RFA)

St. Louis Blues

  1. RW Mathieu Joseph
  2. Oskar Sundqvist
  3. LW Robby Fabbri
  4. LW Dylan Holloway (RFA)
  5. RW Jonatan Berggren (RFA)
  6. Matthew Kessel (RFA)

Tampa Bay Lightning

  1. RW Oliver Bjorkstrand
  2. Darren Raddysh
  3. Declan Carlile (Group VI)
  4. Curtis Douglas (Group VI)

Toronto Maple Leafs

  1. LW Calle Järnkrok
  2. Scott Laughton
  3. LW Bobby McMann
  4. Troy Stecher
  5. Matt Benning
  6. LW Matias Maccelli (RFA)
  7. LW Nicholas Robertson (RFA)
  8. Henry Thrun (RFA)

Utah Mammoth

  1. RW Nick Schmaltz
  2. LW Alexander Kerfoot
  3. Ian Cole
  4. Kevin Stenlund
  5. Juuso Välimäki
  6. Vítek Vaněček
  7. Nick DeSimone
  8. LW Michael Carcone
  9. RW Kailer Yamamoto
  10. Barrett Hayton (RFA)

Vancouver Canucks

  1. LW Evander Kane
  2. Derek Forbort
  3. Teddy Blueger
  4. RW Kiefer Sherwood
  5. David Kämpf
  6. Pierre-Olivier Joseph (RFA)
  7. Lukas Reichel (RFA)

Vegas Golden Knights

  1. Jeremy Lauzon
  2. LW Brandon Saad
  3. RW Reilly Smith
  4. Colton Sissons
  5. Ben Hutton
  6. LW Pavel Dorofeyev (RFA)
  7. Akira Schmid (RFA)

Washington Capitals

  1. LW Alex Ovechkin
  2. John Carlson
  3. Trevor van Riemsdyk
  4. LW Sonny Milano
  5. LW Brandon Duhaime
  6. RW Ethen Frank
  7. Connor McMichael (RFA)
  8. Hendrix Lapierre (RFA)

Winnipeg Jets

  1. RW Gustav Nyquist
  2. Luke Schenn
  3. Jonathan Toews
  4. Colin Miller
  5. Logan Stanley
  6. LW Tanner Pearson
  7. LW Cole Koepke
  8. Eric Comrie
  9. RW Cole Perfetti (RFA)

Salary Cap Deep Dive: Florida Panthers

Navigating the salary cap is one of the most important tasks for a front office.  Teams that can avoid total cap chaos by walking the tightrope of inking players to deals that match their value (or compensate for future value without breaking the bank) remain successful.  Those who don’t often see struggles and front office changes.

PHR will look at every NHL team and give a thorough look at their cap situation for the 2025-26 season.  This will focus more on players who are regulars on the roster versus those who may find themselves shuttling between the AHL and NHL.  All cap figures are courtesy of PuckPedia.  We’re currently covering the Atlantic Division, next up are the Panthers.

Florida Panthers

Current Cap Hit: $103,050,261 (above the $95.5MM Upper Limit)

Entry-Level Contracts

None who are on the active roster on a full-time basis.

Signed Through 2025-26, Non-Entry-Level

D Uvis Balinskis ($850K, UFA)
G Sergei Bobrovsky ($10MM, UFA)
F A.J. Greer ($850K, UFA)
F Noah Gregor ($775K, UFA)
F Luke Kunin ($775K, UFA)
F Tomas Nosek ($775K, UFA)
D Jeff Petry ($775K, UFA)
F Mackie Samoskevich ($775K, RFA)
D Donovan Sebrango ($775K, RFA)
F Cole Schwindt ($825K, UFA)
G Daniil Tarasov ($1.05MM, UFA)

Potential Bonuses
Petry: $250K

Greer has found a nice role in Florida, setting a career high offensively last season while more than doubling his career high in hits as well.  This season, he’s off to an even better start.  Given his role and Florida’s top-heavy salary structure though, they may not be able to afford to keep him if his price tag pushes towards the $1.5MM mark.  Schwindt was a waiver claim from Vegas last month but played sparingly (before being injured earlier this month) after being in and out of the lineup last season.  Unless his role changes considerably, he’s probably going to be capped at the league minimum on his next deal.  Realistically, the same can be said for any of Nosek, Kunin, and Gregor.

However, Samoskevich is a much different situation.  He accepted a one-way deal this past summer, taking less than his qualifying offer to get the guaranteed salary.  In doing so, he’s setting himself up to have salary arbitration rights next summer.  If he plays the middle-six role he currently has all season and beats his 31 points from a year ago, he should easily triple this price tag at a minimum; quadrupling it isn’t unrealistic if he has a big second half.

Balinskis performed well last season in his first full year on the third pairing and is being deployed similarly in the early going this year.  As is the case with Greer, he’d need to stay around the minimum to stay in Florida while his market value might be more in the $1.5MM range.

Petry had a tough year with Detroit last season which certainly hurt his market.  At 37, he’s best served as a third pairing or depth defender and this price tag reflects that.  He has four $50K bonuses tied to games played that are achievable if he stays healthy while the other $50K is dependent on a Stanley Cup victory.  There’s a good chance he stays near the minimum if he keeps playing beyond this season.  Sebrango was claimed off waivers with Florida dealing with injuries.  He’s just looking to get established as an NHL regular at this point but his arbitration eligibility could work against him if Florida thinks that filing for a hearing could push him into seven figures, a risk they might not want to take as he should also stay at the minimum.

There were times in this contract that Bobrovsky’s contract looked like a complete anchor on the books.  However, he has become a bit more consistent in recent years and when Florida traded Spencer Knight at the trade deadline last season, it suggested that their plan is to stick with Bobrovsky beyond this deal as they don’t have anyone else in their system that’s ready.  He’ll be entering his age-38 season in 2026-27 so a long-term deal isn’t likely.  However, a two-year pact could be doable, one that might land closer to half this amount.  Alternatively, if they were to go with a one-year offer, he’d be eligible for performance incentives which could give Florida some shorter-term wiggle room next season.

Tarasov had a rough year in Columbus, ultimately finishing as the third-string goaltender and getting moved for cheap in the summer.  If he can re-establish himself to the level he was at in 2023-24, he could make a case to land closer to $1.75MM or so on his next contract although that’s a price tag Florida likely can’t afford.

Signed Through 2026-27

F Jesper Boqvist ($1.5MM, UFA)
F Eetu Luostarinen ($3MM, UFA)
F Evan Rodrigues ($3MM, UFA)

Free agency hasn’t been kind to Rodrigues which helped explain why he signed a four-year deal for this price tag, a contract that had a chance to become team-friendly pretty quickly.  So far, so good on that front.  As a player who consistently passes 30 points and can play down the middle in a pinch, he should be able to land something in the $4MM range on his next contract.

Luostarinen has been a player who has produced a point total in the 20s in three of the last four seasons.  The production he had last playoffs (19 points in 23 games) was the outlier but for the most part, he has been a third liner making third-line money.  With his production generally being more limited, he might not be able to land as much as Rodrigues next time out.  Boqvist signed this deal near the trade deadline last season and he might have done better than he would have on the open market where he didn’t have a lot of luck in 2024.  As a fourth liner with a bit of versatility, his value should hover somewhere around this mark two years from now.

Signed Through 2027-28

F Jonah Gadjovich ($775K in 2025-26, $905K after)
D Dmitry Kulikov ($1.15MM, UFA)

Gadjovich hasn’t played a lot since joining Florida in 2023 but he has been a serviceable fourth liner who fits the physical style they want to play.  As a 13th forward in an ideal situation, keeping him at just over the minimum salary starting next season isn’t a bad deal for them.

The fact Kulikov received a four-year deal last summer was a surprise but he also left a fair bit of money on the table had he opted to go with shorter-term contracts.  The end result is that he gets a bit of security while the Panthers get a bargain deal for someone who, when healthy (which he currently isn’t), is still a pretty dependable third-pairing defenseman at this point.

Read more

PHR Mailbag: Atlantic Division, Rangers, Kadri, Cooper, Binnington

Topics in this edition of the PHR Mailbag include a look around the Atlantic Division, the potential for the Flames to trade Nazem Kadri, and more.  If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in last weekend’s column while we’ll have one more mailbag from our last call for questions as well.

PyramidHeadcrab: Let’s do a mini Atlantic lightning round:

  1. Buffalo is floundering at the bottom of the East again, and bafflingly looking at offloading another top pick. How short of a leash does Kevyn Adams and the rest of the front office have at this point?
  2. Toronto sans Marner has been a clown show. How much of this is thanks to Stolarz regressing, and how much is due to broader roster management?
  3. Who’s on the rise and who’s declining in Montreal?
  4. Does Ottawa find the next gear and lock in a playoff spot?
  5. What’s the timeline on Barkov and Tkachuk returning in Florida? And if they recover in time, do we see another Cup Final run despite the below-average season thus far?
  6. Anyone else surprised at how Tampa continues to be competitive so consistently?
  7. When does Boston “blow up the team”?
  8. Detroit has fallen off a cliff in recent weeks–do they recover and push for a playoff spot, or extend the drought?

Let’s get right into it with some rapid-fire answers.

1) It looks like a pretty short leash with open speculation that the team is starting to talk about a potential change.  Whether that’s just promoting Jarmo Kekalainen when he’s able to return from a personal leave or going external needs to be seen.  But if ownership has decided that it’s time to make a change, they’re better off making it instead of dragging this out any longer.

2) It seems pretty clear to me that Anthony Stolarz was trying to play through something and the fact his return timeline keeps getting pushed back tells me it was something pretty significant.  But yes, poor goaltending at the start of the season hurt them.  But quietly, they’re scoring at a slightly higher rate than last year (3.3 goals per game versus 3.26 last season) and Joseph Woll – when healthy – gave them good enough goaltending to get back into the mix.  Some of their moves this summer haven’t panned out which isn’t great but they’re in better shape than it might seem at first glance.

3) I’ve been really impressed by Oliver Kapanen this season.  On the bubble to make the roster out of training camp, he has come in and exceeded expectations to the point of being tied for the lead in rookie goals.  That hasn’t solved the second-line center problem but it’s bought them time.  He and Ivan Demidov have shown some promising chemistry early on.  On the decline is their goaltending.  A decent tandem last season, Sam Montembeault and Jakub Dobes (despite a 6-0 start) have fallen off the proverbial cliff.  It’s impressive that the Canadiens are still right in the thick of it in spite of their goaltending.

4) It’s surprising that Ottawa hasn’t picked it up since Brady Tkachuk’s return although they’re still a good week away from probably being in a Wild Card spot.  I had them as a playoff team going into the season and I still think they do get there.  Linus Ullmark has been a little better lately but if he can even get close to the form he’s capable of being, they should be fine.

5) Aleksander Barkov is done for the regular season with the team eventually needing to make a call on if he could be ready late in the playoffs or if he lands on season-ending LTIR.  Matthew Tkachuk has been skating for a couple of weeks now but there’s no firm timeline for a return beyond that he should be good to go in the Olympics.  I don’t want to write them off entirely but with the injuries they have and the fatigue of two long playoff runs, them getting back there again this season would surprise me.

6) The fact that Tampa Bay is consistently strong isn’t too shocking given their core talent and coach (more on him shortly).  That they’re this good this year with a long list of injuries is particularly impressive though.

7) Considering the Bruins are exceeding expectations, I don’t think they’d be looking at blowing things up.  If anything, it wouldn’t surprise me if GM Don Sweeney sees this as evidence that his approach to the summer was correct and they’re on the right track.  That isn’t to say that pending UFAs like Viktor Arvidsson and Andrew Peeke won’t be moved if they’re out of contention in early March but any subtraction would be more limited compared to last season.

8) I think the drought gets extended (and I say this as they’re in a playoff spot).  I liked the John Gibson pickup but he hasn’t panned out as planned as goaltending remains a big sore spot.  The offense has been improved so far but it wouldn’t shock me to see that regress as the season goes on.  I could easily be wrong with how tight the division is but I don’t think this group is quite good enough to really make a run.

Schwa: NYR plans with the Fox injury? How would you play rank the following scenarios in terms of likeliness…

– Let Morrow take the PP1 and hope internal options will get by.

– Drury gets aggressive and mortgages the future to try and save another season stuck in the middle.

– Long-term focused move – maybe something like trading for Mintyukov. Could you see the Ducks being interested in Othmann plus a piece?

Also, a long-term focused idea… could you see Drury trying to move Panarin early – either for someone more long-term focused or for picks and see what Perreault can do?

We know the Rangers are looking to see if there are any affordable options to bolster their firepower on the back end.  Of course, with them not having much in the way of non-LTIR cap room available (when everyone is healthy), their options are pretty limited so I’m not sure they’ll have a ton of success there.  They’ve tried option one a bit already without a lot of success.  I think option three (long-term focused) is the likelier of the remaining two as with the struggles they’ve had at times, it’s hard to see GM Chris Drury think that this is the time to push in some trade chips.

With Pavel Mintyukov’s situation, I think back to a former Ranger in Nils Lundkvist.  A youngster with some perceived potential that consistently seems to be on the borderline on the depth chart although Mintyukov has still been in the lineup more regularly than Lundkvist was in New York.  The return for Lundkvist was a first-round pick and a fourth-round selection.  Yes, Brennan Othmann was a first-round pick but I don’t think he holds that type of value now.  He’d be more of the secondary inclusion at this point and that’s a price the Rangers don’t need to be paying.

As for the potential of moving Artemi Panarin early, it depends on the standings.  If New York is in the thick of the playoff hunt, it’s harder to see them moving him and punting on the season.  But if they slide a little further in the standings and the best-case scenario becomes squeaking into a Wild Card spot, then yes, I do think Drury will at least investigate the options.  If Panarin isn’t willing to take a team-friendly extension (which appears to be what the Rangers are offering), then it would make sense to move him earlier with retention and maximize a trade return with a future asset (either a top pick or strong prospect) coming their way.  It’s too early to make that call but if they keep underachieving, I do think that will be on the table.

@RobG64: Will Kadri get traded?

I know the question doesn’t say should but I’m going to comment on that first.  He should be moved.  The worst thing that happened to Calgary last season was Dustin Wolf dragging them so close to a playoff spot that the Flames think they’re close.  I know they’ve been a bit better as of late but they’re not close to a playoff spot and further away from contending.  Nazem Kadri is 35 years old and isn’t going to be part of the core group (or at least as impactful) by the time they get to that next level.  So, from a logic standpoint, he absolutely should be moved.

But you asked will he be moved.  That, I’m not so sure about.  As long as management in Calgary believes that a playoff berth is reasonably within reach, they’re probably going to want to keep him as making the postseason would be easier with him than without.  On the other hand, their hand is going to get forced sooner or later with pending UFA defenseman Rasmus Andersson as they won’t want to risk losing him for nothing on the open market.  (Or at least they shouldn’t want that.)  So maybe when Andersson goes, they reassess on Kadri.

If I’m handicapping it, I wouldn’t go higher than a 60% chance that Kadri gets moved.  The Flames should get several substantial offers for his services in a market that doesn’t have many sellers and has a lot of buyers looking for centers.  The situation is there for them to get a premium return but I don’t sense their willingness to take it is as it as it probably should be.

FeeltheThunder: Do you think Jon Cooper should be a major contender for the Jack Adams Award this season? Why he hasn’t won it in the past is borderline asinine. He’s taken a Tampa team that surprisingly stumbled out of the gate in early October to start the season and was at the bottom of the Eastern Conference and then by late October changed gears. They go on a win streak and continued it through the majority of November going 11-3 and that is in spite of countless injuries to key players during it. Much more, Tampa’s depth has proven to be significant as this looks like the deepest they’ve been in a few years. What do you think of Cooper’s chances?

While the Lightning have been perhaps a bit streakier than they’d like this season, on the whole, it’s hard not to be impressed.  Despite a litany of injuries (many of which have been to their top players), they have been at or near the top of the Atlantic Division.  If you’d have said to me that they’d be there despite having six of their top seven scorers missing time along with Andrei Vasilevskiy, I’d have had a hard time believing that.  Should he be a contender as things stand?  Absolutely.

Will he be one?  I’m not as confident in saying that.  A lot of years, voters have leaned toward the coach of a team that has taken a big jump in the standings and really exceeded expectations.  That’s not Tampa Bay.  They’re a steady contender which is a big compliment to Cooper and the job he’s done but doesn’t necessarily earn him much support in a one-year award.

Off-hand, there are a couple of teams that fit the usual criteria of being a big improver and surprising in the standings.  One is in the division in Boston’s Marco Sturm.  Few had them as a playoff team and they’re right up there with the Lightning.  Meanwhile, there was an expectation that Anaheim would be better but they’ve been atop the Pacific a lot early on this season which should push some support to Joel Quenneville.  There’s lots of time for the potential contenders to change but as of today, Cooper’s streak likely continues.

vincent k. mcmahon: Does Jordan Binnington eventually get moved to the Oilers (with all the rumors surrounding a potential trade) or barring a huge turnaround he doesn’t get moved?

Assuming he were to be traded, would the return be S. Skinner and picks to St. Louis?

One of the great things with the mailbags is that we get enough questions to break them into multiple columns.  The challenge is picking which ones are safe to push back.  It often works out well but sometimes, well, this happens and kills the question before I have a chance to really answer it.

Clearly, the answer is now a trade to Edmonton isn’t happening.  Honestly, I don’t think it would have anyway, just because of Binnington’s $6MM AAV.  Yes, it’s only $625K higher than Tristan Jarry’s but the hoops the Oilers are jumping through money-wise to stay cap-compliant are significant as it is with three players on LTIR.  That small difference in cap charge might have been enough for them to need to move another player or two out to create the savings to absorb Binnington’s extra cost.

I don’t get the sense that there’s a great trade market out there for Binnington at the moment.  Yes, there are teams looking for goaltending help but right now, how much of a help would he be?  With a save percentage of just .869, he’s already near the bottom of the league so teams aren’t looking at him and thinking he’s a sure-fire upgrade.  They can hope he could be but fitting that money in plus whatever the acquisition cost is likely going to be too much grief for another team to justify right now.

Photo courtesy of David Gonzales-USA TODAY Sports.

Show all