Big Hype Prospects: Morozov, Ignatavicius, Klepov, Henriquez, Hrenak
Welcome to PHR’s Big Hype Prospects series. Like the MLB Trade Rumors series of the same name, we’re taking a look at the performances of top prospects from across the hockey world. We’ll look at rising prospects for the upcoming draft who are worth keeping in mind.
Five Big Hype Prospects
Ilia Morozov, C, Miami University Red Hawks (NCHC)
35 GP, 8 G – 12 A – 20 TP, 27 PIM, +2
Among the many climbing into a spot in this year’s top 15, it may be bulky center Ilia Morozov who has most caught the eye of pro teams. He has played with an overwhelming layer of grit and energy to his game despite starting the year out as college hockey’s youngest player – a title that now belongs to Oscar Hemming, highlighted in our last Big Hype Prospects piece. Morozov’s hard work has translated to more ice time and success in the standings. Miami improved by 15 wins this season, the biggest jump of any Division I team this century excluding the Covid season per ESPN’s John Buccigross. That is in no small part thanks to Morozov, whose tenacity and two-way responsibility helped fortify Miami’s top-six. His game took a major stride from last season in the USHL and Morozov is still among the youngest players in the draft class. That added development time, and his six-foot-three, 205-pound frame, could be enough to convince teams to spend an early pick on the Russian power-forward.
Simas Ignatavicius, LW, Geneve-Servette (National League)
51 GP, 7 G – 8 A – 15 TP, 43 PIM, +6
Another major riser is winger Simas Ignatavicius, who is looking to become the first Lithuanian to be drafted into the NHL since Dainius Zubrus was selected in the 1996 first-round. Coincidentally, Zubrus has made his mark on Ignatavicius’ development path, and helped him elevate his game to a pro level very early on. Ignatavicius shines as a responsible and poised shooter, who knows how to fill his role on the forecheck and wait for the right moments to strike. He has an athletic, six-foot-three frame and smooth skating that come in handy on the forecheck. From there, Ignatavicius can work the cycle and connect with his teammates to create sustained offense. He has been a responsible, bottom-six forward in Switzerland’s top league – but recently boomed on a loan to the country’s second-tier pro league, with seven goals and 11 points in eight games. It was a nice reminder of the scoring upside that Ignatavicius can bring – and an even better reminder that Lithuania seems set to go three-for-three on draft prospects selected in the first round.
Nikita Klepov, RW, Saginaw Spirit (OHL)
61 GP, 35 G – 52 A – 87 TP, 35 PIM, +7
Very few 2026 draft prospects have seen as much of a breakout this season as winger Nikita Klepov. He is hunting down the rare 100-point mark in his first OHL season. If he hits it, Klepov will become the first rookie to reach the century mark since Patrick Kane – though Kane had the benefit of two years with the U.S. National Team Development Program, while Klepov is only one season removed from playing 16U AAA. In between youth hockey and the CHL, he scored 31 points in 59 USHL games, after going completely undrafted in the league. Klepov has had a propensity for living above the moment – and shown off the toolkit to make it possible. He is explosive on the puck, capable of turning slow-moving breakouts into fast-moving offense that generates multiple scoring chances. Better yet, the 6-foot Klepov has shown no fear in crashing through opponents to force play in the slot. He has not caught the eye of every scout – but holds a big spot in the minds of those who favor him. Klepov will be one of many upside buys in this year’s draft, which could place him all over the board.
Roberto Leonardo Henriquez, G, Green Bay Gamblers (USHL)
29 GP, 17 W – 0.925 Sv% – 2.06 GAA, 2 SO, 1 A
The recent rise in goalie goals and goalie fights have opened the door to more ‘Goalie Gordie Howe Hat-Tricks’ – when a netminder records a goal, assist, and fight all in one season. Even then, the feat is hockey’s immaculate inning, maybe occurring once per season and always carrying a special air behind them (though, immaculate innings have become more popular as well). Roberto Leonardo Henriquez will have that rare feat on his resume as he enters the 2026 draft, to go along with the highest save percentage and lowest goals-against average in the USHL. He has been phenomenal after putting together a standout season in the NAHL that unfortunately did not result in a draft selection last season. The six-foot-two, Slovakia/Dominican Republic dual citizen, and University of New Hampshire commit has put together a year that should demand a draft selection in a quiet year for goalies.
Samuel Hrenak, G, Fargo Force (USHL)
4 GP, 3 W – 0.942 Sv% – 1.71 GAA, 0G, 1 SO, 0 A
There is a new challenger for Henriquez’s spot on top of USHL goaltending. Copatriot Samuel Hrenak has been stellar since joining the Fargo Force in February. He has allowed only seven goals through 13 periods of action, after posting a commendable .912 Sv% in 23 games in Slovakia’s U20 league to start the season. Hrenak also filled the dismal role of starting goalie for Team Slovakia’s U18 club, who compete in a handful of exhibition games in Slovakia’s second-tier pro league. That deployment meant a tough start to the year for Hrenak but he is now proving just how impactful he can be in games against his peers. He was ranked in the top-10 of European goalies in the NHL Central Scouting Service’s most recent update and should climb their final list if his dominant USHL start continues. He will be eyeing a mid-round pick, and an NCAA commitment, as the summer roles around – and should be a major addition wherever he ends up.
Post-Deadline Transaction Restrictions
While the trade deadline has come and gone, there will still be quite a few transactions made between now and the end of the season. However, many of those have new restrictions imposed on them, as follows.
Waivers
Teams can still waive players after the trade deadline. However, if they’re claimed, the player is automatically ineligible to play for the remainder of the season. We will likely still see some waiver activity closer to the end of the year if a player on recall and AHL playoff-eligible needs to clear waivers to return to the minors.
Trades
While the term ‘trade deadline’ would imply a hard cap on trades now, that’s not the case. However, similar to players claimed on waivers post-deadline, those players are ineligible to play down the stretch. Over the next week, we will likely see a player or two traded for future considerations to add someone for their AHL team; their trade deadline is exactly one week after the NHL deadline on March 14. Rights to unsigned players will also likely be moved in the coming weeks.
Signings
A player not on an NHL reserve list who signs can play down the stretch during the regular season, but is ineligible to play in the playoffs. We typically see this with college free-agent signings who get into a game or two for the stretch run, but technically, a player on an AHL contract can sign an NHL deal and play with that team until the playoffs.
AHL Eligibility
For a player to be assigned to the minors, that player must have been on an AHL roster at the trade deadline. Otherwise, even if the player is waiver-exempt, he is ineligible to play in the minors. An exception can be made for a player needing a conditioning loan due to a long-term injury. This rule is why there were so many ‘paper transactions’, moves to put a player in the minors before the deadline to keep them eligible to play there down the stretch.
Recalls
This is the one that comes into play the most after the deadline. Teams are limited to five non-emergency recalls between now and the end of the season. That’s a rule change from last summer’s CBA extension; the previous limit was four. Players recalled from deadline-day paper transactions count against the five, so several teams will have fewer than five to work with immediately.
An emergency situation is created when a team has fewer than 12 healthy forwards, six healthy defensemen, or two healthy goaltenders available. In those cases, a player can be recalled under emergency conditions if the team has cap space available. However, when that team gets the injured player(s) back, the recalled player must return to the minors. Otherwise, his recall is converted from an emergency one to a regular one and would count against the limit of four.
Pretty much every team will still be involved in transactions of some sort over the next few weeks, but they’ll need to be mindful of these restrictions when making them.
Trade Deadline Primer: Utah Mammoth
With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is tomorrow. Where do each team stand, and what moves should they be targeting? We continue our look around the league, focusing on playoff-hunting teams, and we’re back with the Mammoth.
The Mammoth are currently in a wild-card spot in the Western Conference and would love nothing more than to give their fans some playoff home games in just their second season. Utah has been mentioned as a potential suitor for St. Louis Blues forward Robert Thomas, who, at just 26 years of age, would fit with the Mammoth’s contention timeline. There are a few teams that can match Utah’s stockpile of future assets and young players, making that link a real possibility.
Record
32-25-4, 4th in the Central
Deadline Status
Buyer
Deadline Cap Space
$25.72MM on deadline day, 2/3 retention slots used, 45/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: UTA 1st, UTA 3rd, CAR 3rd, UTA 4th, UTA 5th, CHI 5th, UTA 7th
2027: UTA 1st, UTA 2nd, UTA 3rd, TOR 3rd, UTA 4th, EDM 4th, UTA 5th, TBL 5th, UTA 6th, UTA 7th
Trade Chips
The Mammoth have a key UFA this summer in forward Nick Schmaltz, a player expected to be among, if not the best, free-agent forwards available. The Mammoth are unlikely to move the 30-year-old, who is having a career year and should be a major part of their playoff push. Other pending UFAs include forwards Alexander Kerfoot, Kevin Stenlund, defenseman Ian Cole, and backup goaltender Vitek Vanecek. Aside from Schmaltz, none of these players are expected to fetch much value on the trade market, and considering Utah’s position, it doesn’t make sense to move them.
Looking down the list of other potential trade chips, Utah has a top-five prospect system in the NHL with an embarrassment of riches, including Tij Iginla, Caleb Desnoyers, Dmitri Simashev, Daniil But, and Maveric Lamoureux.
Iginla has name recognition thanks to his father Jarome Iginla’s illustrious career, but he is a very different player from his dad. Iginla works quickly and plays a speed-based game that excels in transition and on the rush. He is a decent playmaker, though not exceptional, but his shot can do a lot of damage. Iginla plays with a high motor and isn’t afraid to be first in on the forecheck. If Utah were to make him available, there would be teams interested in him because of his abilities and pedigree.
As promising as Iginla is, he isn’t the Mammoth’s top prospect; that distinction belongs to forward Desnoyers, who was the fourth overall pick in last year’s NHL Entry Draft. Desnoyers had an outstanding playoff last year in the QMJHL, showcasing his skills and size by scoring 30 points in just 19 playoff games. Desnoyers plays a well-rounded game overall, but his skill level wouldn’t be considered high-end. That said, he is quite responsible defensively and is one of the hardest workers on the ice.
On the back end is Simashev, a towering defenseman who dominates the defensive zone and rarely gets caught running around in his own zone. Big defensemen remain in demand regardless of skill level and effectiveness, which is quite evident if you look at recent NHL trades (Tyler Myers, for example). Simashev doesn’t light up the score sheet (one assist in 24 NHL games), and no one will mistake him for an offensive defenseman, but he is a capable puck carrier, has fairly good passing skills, and, of course, can hit. Simashev’s already broken into the NHL roster at 21 years of age and has top-four NHL potential; he would be an ideal partner for an offensive defenseman, which is something teams are always looking for.
Finally, let’s look at Daniil But, who has spent some time in the NHL with the Mammoth and is having a solid offensive showing in the AHL as well. At 6’6” and just 21 years old, you might expect some awkwardness or clumsiness in But’s game, but he is actually quite smooth and refined in his puck handling, shooting, and passing. Not to be overlooked is his shooting, which is excellent, as his large frame allows him to generate plenty of torque on his shots, no matter which foot he uses. Teams often pay a premium for size, but the combination of size and skill gives But significant trade value if Utah decides to move him.
Team Needs
A Top Nine Forward: This team’s primary need was a top-four defenseman; however, since the Mammoth recently acquired MacKenzie Weegar, Utah now has a solid defensive unit. Up front, they could benefit from a scoring forward to better balance their top nine, as their offense is only average, ranking 16th in the NHL in scoring. As mentioned earlier, Utah was in talks with the Blues for Thomas, but no deal was reached. It’s difficult to determine whether Utah needs to acquire a player with Thomas’ skill level, but a top-six forward would definitely be ideal to move players down the lineup into roles better suited to their abilities. The player they acquire could also be a third liner, but their main focus will likely be scoring, whether it’s depth scoring or improving overall.
A Backup Goaltender: Utah is among the top defensive teams in the NHL, ranking fifth in goals against this season. The team has relied heavily on starter Karel Vejmelka and has used backup netminder Vaněček sparingly. The reason for Vaněček’s limited play is quite clear, given his poor performance this season in just 14 games. The 30-year-old has a 3-9-2 record, a 2.94 GAA, and a .884 SV%. Vaněček’s -1.3 goals saved above expected (according to MoneyPuck) isn’t the worst figure, but his lack of appearances and record with the team indicate a goaltender who hasn’t exactly boosted confidence among his teammates. Utah also lacks a reliable third option if Vejmelka or Vaněček were to get injured.
Photo by Kim Klement Neitzel-Imagn Images
Trade Deadline Primer: Nashville Predators
With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is this week. Where do each team stand, and what moves should they be targeting? We continue our look around the league, focusing on playoff-hunting teams, and we’re back with the Predators.
Nashville isn’t a strong hockey team, but luckily for them, they play in the Western Conference. Despite an unimpressive record, they are still fighting for a playoff spot. The Predators have an ageing and costly core and would likely prefer to get younger now. However, they have several high-priced contracts that are hard to move, and a few others they might deal if they can persuade the players to accept a trade. What Nashville will do remains uncertain, but they do have options despite their fragile roster setup.
Record
27-26-8, 5th in the Central
Deadline Status
Conservative Seller
Deadline Cap Space
$31.75MM on deadline day, 2/3 retention slots used, 41/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: NAS 1st, NAS 2nd, MIN 2nd, NAS 3rd, NAS 4th, NAS 5th, EDM 5th, CAR 5th, UTA 6th, NAS 7th
2027: NAS 1st, NAS 2nd, STL 2nd, NAS 3rd, EDM 3rd, VGK 3rd, COL 3rd, NAS 4th, NYR 4th, NAS 5th, COL 5th, NAS 6th, NAS 7th
Trade Chips
What the Predators do over the next two days will depend on several factors, including the offers they receive and how they play this week. They don’t have to do anything. They could retain their pending UFAs and make a run for the playoffs if they wanted, and it would be understandable given the age of their core players.
That being said, if a team makes a high-priced offer for center Ryan O’Reilly, you have to believe the Predators would listen. O’Reilly has one year left on a team-friendly $4.5MM cap hit and would bring Nashville a substantial return if traded. It’s difficult to assess whether it’s a buyer’s or a seller’s market. Some people have said it leans heavily towards the sellers, but a few teams have committed to selling in recent days, which will change the market a bit. That being said, if it turns out to be a seller’s market, Nashville will likely trade him. If the opposite is true, they will probably hold onto him until at least the summer.
Steven Stamkos has also been mentioned as a potential trade candidate in recent weeks. Stamkos is in his second year with the Predators after a widely discussed departure from the Tampa Bay Lightning. The 36-year-old Stamkos didn’t have an ideal first year in Nashville by his standards, but he has improved significantly this season, with 30 goals and 17 assists in 61 games. His near 0.5 goals per game would be very attractive to any NHL team, but Stamkos holds sway over his own fate thanks to a full no-movement clause and can remain with the team if he chooses. Given the limited time to make a move, it seems likely Stamkos could be a summer trade candidate, but anything is possible if teams and players are motivated to facilitate deals.
Beyond the two veterans, Nashville has a few other players they could trade at the deadline, starting with forward Michael Bunting, who is a UFA this summer. The 30-year-old has been traded twice in the last two years, both times around the trade deadline, and could be moved for a third time during his current three-year contract. There is nothing wrong with Bunting’s game; he remains a solid depth scorer with a bit of sandpaper to his game. Bunting could be a good addition to a team seeking more scoring from their middle six and likely wouldn’t cost too much if Nashville decides to move him.
Erik Haula is another veteran forward with an expiring deal who might be moved. The 34-year-old is having a solid offensive season, with nine goals and 21 assists in 61 games, making him a decent addition to a team’s bottom six. Like Bunting, he is a UFA this summer, and the cost to acquire him shouldn’t be too high, which could attract teams working within an asset budget. Haula is a fantastic penalty killer, decent on faceoffs, and a good defensive forward, but he takes far too many minor penalties, which might be problematic for a contending team.
Team Needs
A Center: The Predators currently lack sufficient center depth, and trading O’Reilly would weaken what little they have. The team recently moved Michael McCarron to the Minnesota Wild and needs to acquire some centers — preferably young ones — who can eventually play behind the 2025 fifth-overall pick, Brady Martin, once he makes his full-time transition to the NHL. The Predators have a few other center prospects who project as NHLers, but it’s hard to tell if they will develop into top-six options. O’Reilly won’t be around during the Predators’ next contention window, but if they want to develop strong center prospects, he could serve as a mentor, similar to how Sidney Crosby has helped 18-year-old Benjamin Kindel develop in Pittsburgh.
Prospects: The Predators have a slightly above-average farm system if you look at conventional prospect rankings. But if they are keen on launching their rebuild while the likes of Juuse Saros and Filip Forsberg are still key contributors, they will need to ramp up their drafting and development. The optimal way to do that would be to sell off any veteran assets that can be moved and trade for futures or young roster players. As the Pittsburgh Penguins and Washington Capitals have demonstrated in recent years, teams can retool on the fly with a veteran core and compete quickly if they are willing to make tough decisions and take chances. Current GM Barry Trotz won’t be the one to make those decisions, but he can lay a foundation on his way out the door that will allow the next general manager to make those hard choices. Nashville has Saros signed until 2033 and Forsberg until 2030. It’s not unrealistic to believe that the Predators could be competitive again in another 2-3 years, giving them some runway with their vets to serve as both mentors and contributors while their young players find their way in the NHL.
Photo by Per Haljestam-Imagn Images
Trade Deadline Primer: Columbus Blue Jackets
With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is this week. Where do each team stand, and what moves should they be targeting? We continue our look around the league, focusing on playoff-hunting teams, and we’re back with the Blue Jackets.
The Blue Jackets haven’t made the playoffs since the 2020 bubble and were close last season, finishing with 89 points and narrowly missing the postseason. Coming into this year, there was an air of optimism in Columbus. However, a 19-19-7 start under former head coach Dean Evason quickly let the air out of the balloon and left many fans wondering whether Columbus would sell off their pending UFAs. They haven’t done that to this point and have climbed back into the playoff picture, going 11-2-1 under new head coach Rick Bowness. Now heading into the deadline, Columbus sits five points out of the final wild-card spot in the Eastern Conference with a game in hand and 23 games to go. What they will do at the trade deadline is anyone’s guess, but they have dropped hints.
Record
30-21-8, 5th in the Metropolitan (39.2% playoff probability)
Deadline Status
Conservative Buyer
Deadline Cap Space
$45.55MM on deadline day, 0/3 retention slots used, 46/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: CBJ 1st, STL 2nd, CBJ 3rd, COL 3rd, TOR 4th, CBJ 5th, PIT 6th, CBJ 7th
2027: CBJ 1st, CBJ 3rd, WAS 3rd, COL 3rd, CBJ 4th, CBJ 5th, CBJ 6th, CBJ 7th
Trade Chips
The Blue Jackets dealt their best trade chip at the end of December, trading Egor Chinakhov to the Pittsburgh Penguins for Danton Heinen and two draft picks. That move wasn’t a trade for this season, but it did give the Blue Jackets two additional draft picks to potentially make additions with, on top of their other catalogue of picks. Columbus GM Don Waddell doesn’t sound like he is ready to make a big splash or punt on this season, so it could be a quiet deadline in Ohio.
2021 fifth overall pick, Kent Johnson, is a potential trade chip who has been a healthy scratch for a few games now. The 23-year-old has a pair of successful NHL seasons under his belt, but they are sandwiched between several seasons of inconsistency, including this year. Johnson has just six goals and 12 assists in 56 games, after registering 24 goals and 33 assists last year in 68 games. Johnson was once touted as the Blue Jackets’ top prospect, but at this point, he could be their best trade chip if they want to make additions at the deadline. There is a gamble in moving him while he is slumping, though he does have a track record of scoring in the NHL, and it might be best to be patient with him and see if he can rediscover his game, particularly given that the Chinakhov trade looks quite bad right now for Columbus.
Columbus will likely keep this next player, but there will be interest in center Charlie Coyle. The 34-year-old has 126 games of NHL playoff experience, and many teams would love to have him as their third-line center should he be available. Coyle has 15 goals and 30 assists in 59 games this season and fits a need that many teams have, but very few sellers are currently offering. The Blue Jackets likely want to keep Coyle, but they might get offers that are too difficult to ignore for a player who likely doesn’t figure in much of the Blue Jackets’ long-term future. Even if they re-sign Coyle to a multi-year deal, he likely won’t be producing at his current levels when Columbus enters their contention window.
In terms of prospects, the Blue Jackets aren’t dealing their top picks, Cayden Lindstrom or Jackson Smith, but a prospect such as Luca Del Bel Belluz could be the centerpiece of a big trade in Columbus, had the team changed its mind and gone big-game hunting. Belluz was the Jackets’ second-round pick (44th overall) in 2022 and is likely to return to the NHL very soon, given his impressive AHL numbers this year (15 goals and 28 assists in 41 games). The 22-year-old was with Columbus until just before Christmas, when he was demoted to the AHL after posting just a single point in 13 NHL games. It was Belluz’s second lengthy NHL audition, with his previous opportunity yielding eight points in 15 games. Belluz might not have the name recognition of some of Columbus’s other prospects, but he does have a solid resume thus far and is in just his third professional season.
Team Needs
A Top Six Forward: Unfortunately for the Blue Jackets, Johnson’s poor season has left the team in a spot where they could use another top-six forward. With Johnson playing his way off the top two lines, Heinen has occasionally taken a spot, as have other depth forwards. Columbus has a below-average offense, and a top-six forward could push others in the lineup into a more advantageous position and unlock additional offense. Unfortunately for the Blue Jackets, things didn’t work out with Chinakhov, as he has filled that top-six role in Pittsburgh for the Penguins, leaving them in a spot where they have to hunt down their own top-six solution.
A Top Pairing Defenseman: Damon Severson is a very good NHL player and has long been an analytical darling. But the once-offensive defenseman has struggled with turnovers over the last two seasons and is better served on the second pairing. The 31-year-old has yet to top the 30-point mark in Columbus, something he did four times in New Jersey and would be better served to play against lesser competition, which could free him up more offensively. It’s unlikely the Columbus could find a right-shot top-pairing defender before the deadline, but in a perfect world, they would supplant Severson. It’s also possible that the Blue Jackets feel they have the heir apparent in Denton Mateychuk, who is just 21 years old and has been terrific this season.
Photo by Timothy T. Ludwig-USA TODAY Sports
Trade Deadline Primer: Anaheim Ducks
With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is less than a week away. Where does each team stand, and what moves should they be looking to make? Next up is the Ducks.
The Ducks currently hold a playoff spot in the Western Conference and have been a pleasant surprise this season. The team is in a very advantageous position heading into the trade deadline, with a ton of trade capital and plenty of space under the salary cap. If GM Pat Verbeek wanted to get aggressive, he certainly could, but given that it is a buyer’s market, it feels as though this club might not be ready to make a splash just yet. Verbeek has seen mixed results making trades in recent years, but there is no doubt he has put together a good blend of youth and veteran experience in Anaheim.
Record
33-23-3, 2nd in the Pacific (93.6% playoff probability)
Deadline Status
Conservative Buyer
Deadline Cap Space
$52.61MM on deadline day, 1/3 retention slots used, 44/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: ANA 1st, ANA 2nd, ANA 3rd, DET 4th, ANA 5th, ANA 6th, ANA 7th
2027: ANA 1st, ANA 2nd, STL 2nd, DET 3rd, ANA 3rd, ANA 5th, ANA 6th, ANA 7th
Trade Chips
Pavel Mintyukov isn’t necessarily the Ducks’ best trade chip, but he’s the most likely to be used before the deadline if the Ducks are to make a significant move. It was just a few years ago that the former 10th-overall pick (in 2022) was a standout OHL defenseman with a lot of shine to his game. In 2023-24, the then 20-year-old had a terrific rookie season, tallying four goals and 24 assists in 63 games, finishing 14th in the Calder Trophy conversation. The versatile defenseman hasn’t been able to match that level of production since and has been squeezed quite a bit by the Ducks’ packed left side of their defense.
This depth has led to Mintyukov being a healthy scratch at times and to his playing time being reduced, something he clearly isn’t happy with. If the Ducks decide the youngster isn’t a fit with the team, he still has enough value to be a solid trade chip if the Ducks want to grab a bigger asset to improve their lineup in the here and now. The issue for the Ducks on their back end is that they need defensive defenders on the right side, which is what Jacob Trouba and Radko Gudas were supposed to be. With both of those men likely gone in the offseason, Verbeek may hang on to Mintyukov.
Among other top young players, the Ducks aren’t moving forward Beckett Sennecke, the third overall pick in 2024, who has been a rookie sensation this year, scoring 19 goals and 29 assists in 58 games. Beyond Sennecke, the Ducks have a few prospects they could look to move if they wanted to go big-game hunting.
The Ducks have strong depth on the left side of their defensive core, which could make Stian Solberg expendable. The 2024 first-round pick (23rd overall) has been toiling in the AHL in his first full season in North America. At just 20 years old, Solberg has shown he is very difficult to play against, thanks to a mean streak a mile long and an ability to keep opponents away from the front of his team’s net. Solberg doesn’t have the offensive instincts to contribute much on the scoresheet, but he does have a heavy shot and is an efficient skater.
Moving up to forward, there is little chance the Ducks move Roger McQueen, whom they drafted last summer, but Lucas Pettersson, a 2024 second-round pick (35th overall), could interest teams looking for a player whose NHL trajectory is about two years away. Pettersson is a bit on the small side, but he makes up for it with a two-way game that leans offensively. The 19-year-old is a creative playmaker who can play in any situation and possesses terrific offensive skills, including a sneaky-accurate wrist shot and great passing. Pettersson could be of interest to teams seeking a plug-and-play forward who is potentially a second- or third-line NHL center in the making.
Team Needs
A Right Shot Defenseman: The Ducks continue to deploy Trouba and Gudas in roles that are beyond their skill set, but that shouldn’t be the case beyond this season. Right-handed defensemen are always in demand and among the hardest assets to acquire. The Ducks may opt to wait until the summer to try to sign or trade for one, but the free-agent market for defense is barren, and the Ducks may not be inclined to get into a bidding war. GM Pat Verbeek has shown a tendency to overpay in free agency to acquire assets (Alex Killorn, for example), but with Cutter Gauthier and Leo Karlsson both due raises as RFAs this summer, he might not want to spend so liberally. Rasmus Andersson of the Vegas Golden Knights could be the best available defender if he reaches the market, while Tampa Bay’s Darren Raddyish is having a monster year with the Lightning. A veteran like John Carlson could also test the market, but at 36, he might be too late in his career for the Ducks to consider him an option.
Bottom Six Depth: The Ducks’ bottom six isn’t great right now, as injuries have forced Ryan Poehling to center the third line and Jansen Harkins to take regular shifts in the NHL lineup. No disrespect to either man, but they are both currently playing in roles beyond their skill sets. Poehling is a capable fourth-line center but is often overmatched when playing in the top nine, while Harkins is best served as a tweener with limited offensive capabilities. Both men’s spots in the lineup clearly indicate a need for the Ducks to get deeper on their bottom two lines. The Ducks could acquire top-six help and push players down the hierarchy, or they could look for bargain options that could slide onto the third or fourth line to fill out a bottom six that is currently quite weak.
Image courtesy of Darren Yamashita-Imagn Images.
Salary Cap Deep Dive: Toronto Maple Leafs
Navigating the salary cap is one of the most important tasks for a front office. Teams that can avoid total cap chaos by walking the tightrope of inking players to deals that match their value (or compensate for future value without breaking the bank) remain successful. Those who don’t often see struggles and front office changes.
PHR will look at every NHL team and give a thorough look at their cap situation for the 2025-26 season. This will focus more on players who are regulars on the roster versus those who may find themselves shuttling between the AHL and NHL. All cap figures are courtesy of PuckPedia. We’re currently covering the Atlantic Division, last up are the Maple Leafs.
Toronto Maple Leafs
Current Cap Hit: $94,621,472 (under the $95.5MM Upper Limit)
Entry-Level Contracts
F Easton Cowan (three years, $873.5K)
After a strong junior career, Cowan made the jump directly to the NHL and has been a capable player in a limited role. They’ll be hoping that he can move into a top-six role before too long (potentially as soon as next season) which could change his trajectory quickly. At this point, it seems more likely that he’d get a bridge deal (potentially in the $3MM to $4MM range) but if he becomes a top-six piece fairly soon and sticks, he could also wind up with a longer-term deal which could cost as much as double that amount.
Signed Through 2025-26, Non-Entry-Level
D Matt Benning ($1.25MM, UFA)
F Calle Jarnkrok ($2.1MM, UFA)
F Scott Laughton ($1.5MM, RFA)*
F Matias Maccelli ($3.425MM, RFA)
F Bobby McMann ($1.35MM, UFA)
F Nicholas Robertson ($1.825MM, RFA)
D Troy Stecher ($787.5K, UFA)
*-Philadelphia is retaining an additional $1.5MM on Laughton’s contract.
Maccelli was brought in from Utah in the hopes that he’d help replace some of the playmaking that left when Mitch Marner went to Vegas. Instead, he has bounced up and down and even in and out of the lineup as a healthy scratch at times while not producing as much as they hoped for. Owed a $4.11MM qualifying offer with arbitration rights, he’s a strong non-tender candidate unless they work out a cheaper deal closer to his current price before then. Laughton has seen his production tumble since joining Toronto. However, he’s still a strong defensive player and is having a career year at the faceoff dot. That should be enough to earn him at least a small raise on a multi-year pact even with his offensive struggles.
Jarnkrok is not the impactful utility player he was earlier in his career, resulting in several healthy scratches. If he doesn’t wind up going back overseas this summer, he’s probably looking at a contract closer to the league minimum. Robertson has taken some strides this season, putting him on pace for a career year while having arbitration rights this summer. A jump to the $3MM range isn’t unrealistic as a result.
McMann will be one of the more intriguing UFA options this summer, especially since a lot of the top players have already re-signed. Barring injury, he’s a lock for his second straight 20-goal season and will get there despite playing time that is in the low end for a second liner and is more like a high-end third liner. Tripling his current price seems quite likely; a bidding war could push it into the $5MM range.
Benning hasn’t been up with Toronto for most of the season and only gets a passing mention here because $100K is on their books as a dead cap charge while he’s with the Marlies. Stecher, meanwhile, has been a very serviceable waiver claim from Edmonton, going from a fringe blueliner to someone logging 20 minutes a night. Still, given how he has bounced around and is generally viewed as more of a depth player, he probably won’t get a huge boost on his next deal. Doubling this could be doable, however, which would be a nice outcome for someone who was on waivers just a few months ago.
Signed Through 2026-27
D Simon Benoit ($1.35MM, UFA)
D Brandon Carlo ($3.485MM, UFA)*
D Philippe Myers ($850K, UFA)
F Nicolas Roy ($3MM, UFA)
*-Boston is retaining an additional $615K on Carlo’s contract.
Roy came over from Vegas in the Marner sign-and-trade and has basically been the effective third liner he has been for most of his career. The price tag for those types of players has ticked up in recent years and should continue to do so in a more inflated cap environment. A bump to the $4MM territory could be doable while Laughton’s next contract this coming summer could serve as a good indicator of where Roy’s could land.
Toronto paid a high price to land Carlo at the trade deadline last season and it hasn’t quite worked out so far. Never a big point producer, even his defensive game has slipped a bit. Even so, he’ll be UFA-eligible at the age of 30 and is a big, right-shot player. Those elements should still land him a raise unless his play really falls off a cliff between now and then. A multi-year pact in the $4.5MM range might be the floor right now with a bump up from that if his performance rebounds next season.
Benoit has been a serviceable third-pairing player for most of his career but his limitations are well-known. It’s plausible that he stays in this area (even a jump to $1.5MM or so wouldn’t be surprising) but it seems unlikely that he’d command more than that unless he suddenly becomes more of a top-four option. Myers was once a quality prospect in Philadelphia but has been more of a fringe player in recent years. He’s likely to stay at the minimum salary and even securing a one-way deal isn’t a guarantee at this point.
Signed Through 2027-28
F Max Domi ($3.75MM, UFA)
D Oliver Ekman-Larsson ($3.5MM, UFA)
F Dakota Joshua ($3.25MM, UFA)
F Steven Lorentz ($1.35MM, UFA)
F Auston Matthews ($13.25MM, UFA)
G Joseph Woll ($3.67MM, UFA)
Matthews has opted for a shorter-term contract in each of his two non-entry-level negotiations. The idea was that doing so set him up best for a big payday. It worked the first time as this deal was briefly the record-setter for AAV. It’s hard to project that happening again, knowing some other contracts that have since been signed (and others to come) but if Matthews is open to a long-term pact this time around, a jump past the $15MM mark could be realistic, as long as his offensive drop this season isn’t a sign of things to come. However, if he wants another shorter-term agreement, the price tag could run a little higher but still not challenge for another league record.
Domi’s first season in Toronto was good enough to land him the multi-year commitment that he had been seeking for a while. Things haven’t gone as well since then, however. While he’s a strong playmaker, his lack of goals, a smaller stature, and a penchant for penalties could result in his market being more restricted than most again. Barring an improvement in his production over the next couple of years, he might have a hard time matching this price and term on his next contract.
Joshua was acquired over the offseason from Vancouver with the hopes that a change of scenery could get him back to his 2023-24 level. That hasn’t exactly happened as he has played more like a fourth liner making third-line money. He will need to rebound considerably in the back half of the deal to have any chance of matching this on his next contract. Lorentz rebounded well last season after a limited 2023-24 campaign in Florida and was able to earn some stability with this deal. For a fourth liner who can kill penalties, this is a reasonable contract but with his limited offensive upside, he’s probably not going to be able to command much more down the road.
Ekman-Larsson opted for stability as well back in 2024 with this deal, a four-year pact that takes him through his age-36 season. After a more limited role in Florida following a buyout from Vancouver, he has been deployed regularly in a top-four role and has thrived. Given how much he has played over the years, there could be some concern of him slowing down at the back of the contract but right now, this is definitely one of their better bargains.
When healthy, Woll has looked like a legitimate NHL starting goaltender. However, staying healthy has been a challenge in recent years which has limited his earnings upside. If he has a good year or two on this deal and can play 50-plus games, doubling this price tag is certainly realistic. However, if he continues to be in the 35-40-game range (either through injuries or being in a straight platoon), Woll might be more in the $5MM territory moving forward.
Trade Deadline Primer: New York Islanders
With the Olympic break over, the trade deadline is under a week away. Where does each team stand, and what moves should they be looking to make? Next up is the Islanders.
The Islanders made some big moves last summer, sending defenseman Noah Dobson to the Montreal Canadiens and drafting Matthew Schaefer with the first overall pick. Many pundits weren’t sure what the Islanders would be this season, but they have surprised some folks by becoming a playoff contender with a roster that doesn’t have much flash but is solid enough to compete in the Eastern Conference. The Islanders have won on the back of strong team defense and goaltending this season, and despite the lack of skill in their lineup, they’ve managed to score enough to win games.
Record
33-21-5, 3rd in the Metropolitan
Deadline Status
Buyer
Deadline Cap Space
$6.02MM on deadline day, 0/3 retention slots used, 49/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: NYI 1st, COL 1st, NJD 3rd, NYI 4th, NYI 5th, NYI 6th, NYI 7th
2027: NYI 1st, NYI 2nd, NYI 3rd, NYI 4th, NYI 5th, NYI 6th, NJD 6th, NYI 7th
Trade Chips
The Islanders have built up their prospect pool in recent seasons thanks to several successful first-round picks. The team likely has a top ten pipeline and the assets to be aggressive on the trade front if the money works. That ranking doesn’t include defenseman Schaefer, who went straight to the NHL, but there is no chance New York moves him anytime soon.
Setting aside the Islanders’ lottery win, they have done some good business in the trade market, moving on from Dobson and Brock Nelson for very strong returns. From these two trades, the team ended up with Victor Eklund, Kashawn Aitcheson and Calum Ritchie. Those three are all arguably among the top 100 NHL prospects at the moment and are a big reason the Islanders now have one of the best prospect systems in the NHL.
If the Islanders moved any of those three players, they would have one of the better trade chips available in terms of future value. Eklund’s skill is among his strongest assets, along with his top-notch skating. Those traits would make him appealing to every team in the league, but his ability to battle could be the best feature of his game. Eklund battles from whistle to whistle and isn’t afraid to play with reckless abandon.
Aitcheson is a physical defender who plays an old-school game that should resonate with the Long Island crowd. Aitcheson could one day be a top-pairing, bruising defenseman who plays a stay-at-home game alongside a more offensively minded partner. Aitcheson’s game isn’t flashy, but he is safe and responsible in his own end, bringing an intensity to the ice that few could match. His ability to give the opponent absolutely nothing to work with could eventually earn him a reputation as the NHL’s ultimate shutdown man, provided he improves his average skating and harnesses his intimidating presence.
Ritchie saw his draft stock slide a few years ago as he focused more on becoming a 200-foot player rather than simply being a point producer. It paid off in terms of his overall game, but he did slide in the NHL draft rankings before being scooped up by the Avalanche late in the first round (27th overall) of the 2023 draft. Ritchie possesses a mean shot that should translate well to the NHL, particularly on the power play. He also has elite hockey sense, anticipating plays before they happen and hunting down soft areas of the ice to get himself open or in the right spot at the right time.
Finally, we come to another first-round pick, forward Cole Eiserman. The 20-year-old isn’t an imposing presence, but he loves to throw his body around and doesn’t mind taking a hit to make a play. Eiserman will cruise to the front of the net in the offensive zone to stir up some disruption, but he does most of his scoring from a distance with his shot, which was considered one of the best during his draft eligibility.
Team Needs
A Top Six Forward: The Islanders gambled this summer when they signed forward Jonathan Drouin to a two-year deal, hoping he could fill an offensive role in the top six. While he hasn’t produced what GM Mathieu Darche hoped, he has chipped in with some offense and remains a good gamble. That being said, New York needs more from its top two lines, and bringing in a Jordan Kyrou-type from St. Louis would go a long way toward adding to an offense that is currently 22nd in the league. The Islanders could also look at Kyrou’s teammate, Robert Thomas, if the Blues were open to it, or take a long look at some of the forwards the Vancouver Canucks have made available, such as Elias Pettersson.
Depth Scoring: The Islanders need more offense from the bottom of their lineup and could look at a player like Michael Bunting of Nashville, who has a long history of providing depth offense on good hockey teams. Bunting is a UFA at the end of the season and has been effective as a depth scorer in Toronto, Pittsburgh and Nashville. If Bunting isn’t an option and the Islanders want to look at a pure shooter, Patrik Laine of the Montreal Canadiens would be a player who could fit simply as a triggerman. Laine doesn’t play much of a two-way game, but on a team like the Islanders, where he would be defensively insulated, it might be a great fit for a once-great goalscorer who has fallen on hard times in Montreal. Laine isn’t a prototypical depth player, but at this point, there isn’t much to his game away from the puck, and with all of his injury concerns, he could likely be acquired for very little.
Trade Deadline Primer: Seattle Kraken
With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is almost a week away. Where does each team stand, and what moves should they be looking to make? We continue our look around the league with teams in the fight for a playoff spot, next up are the Kraken.
Coming into the season, expectations weren’t particularly high for Seattle. They were coming off missing the playoffs and didn’t do much to shake up their roster. However, a significant improvement defensively under new head coach Lane Lambert has them squarely in the race for a playoff spot. But with some prominent veterans on expiring contracts, will they run the risk of letting them walk in free agency to bolster their playoff hopes or weaken those postseason odds to ensure they get a good return for some of those players?
Record
27-22-9, 4th in the Pacific (55.5% playoff probability, per MoneyPuck)
Deadline Status
Wild Card, could buy, sell, or some of each
Deadline Cap Space
$22.07MM on deadline day, 0/3 retention slots used, 45/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: SEA 1st, TB 1st, SEA 2nd, ANA 4th, NYR 4th, SEA 4th, SEA 6th, NJ 7th, SEA 7th
2027: SEA 1st, TB 1st, CBJ 2nd, SEA 2nd, WPG 2nd, SEA 3rd, SEA 4th, SEA 5th, SEA 6th, SEA 7th
Trade Chips
Let’s talk about the veterans first. Up front, captain Jordan Eberle has already reached the 20-goal mark for the ninth time in his career and leads Seattle in scoring with 38 points. The captain has a full no-trade clause but his $4.75MM cap charge for a second-line winger is quite reasonable while he has a solid track record in the playoffs with a point-per-game average that’s rather close to his regular season averages.
Forward Jaden Schwartz has been a capable top-six player in recent years but, like many Kraken players this season, his output is down a bit in 2025-26. Still, with his track record and ability to play center in a pinch, there would be a market for his services, even at a $5.75MM cap charge. That said, his injury history might limit his potential return compared to another UFA winger in Eeli Tolvanen. Tolvanen brings a lot of physicality to the table with a bit of an offensive punch, although it’s highly unlikely he gets back to the 20-goal mark this season as he did a year ago. For teams looking to add some grit to their third line, his $3.475MM price tag will be appealing. Also worth noting is that Tolvanen doesn’t have any trade protection in his contract.
Perhaps their most appealing rental player is on the back end, however. Two elements that playoff-bound teams are consistently looking to add are grit and size to their blueline. Jamie Oleksiak brings both of those to the table. While he’s only a third-pairing player at five-on-five, he can log heavy penalty killing minutes, block plenty of shots, and play in late-game situations. His $4.6MM AAV for that role is on the high side but it stands to reason that Seattle would retain the maximum of 50% to maximize their return; a $2.3MM cap charge is much more affordable for contenders. Even though he’s having a bit of a down year, Oleksiak’s market will be strong if he’s put in play.
Over the last couple of months, center Shane Wright’s name has come up in a discussion of players who are believed to be available. The fourth overall pick in 2022 is a regular third-liner for the second straight season, although his offensive numbers are down from his rookie campaign when he potted 19 goals and 44 points in 79 games. Given the high demand for centers and the fact he’s easily affordable on the salary cap given that he’s on his entry-level deal, the Kraken would be well-positioned to command a quality return should they opt to trade from their center depth.
If Seattle opts to be a light buyer, one prospect to keep an eye on is Logan Morrison. A prolific scorer in junior, he’s having a strong season with AHL Coachella Valley, checking in at just under a point per game. Still, his NHL opportunity has been limited to just four games last season. He’s in his final year of waiver exemption and there could be a few teams that would have interest in giving him an NHL look down the stretch.
Team Needs
Offensive Firepower: While Seattle is much-improved defensively this season, it has come at the expense of some scoring as they’ve gone from a mid-pack team to one barely ahead of the bottom five in scoring. No player has hit 40 points yet (though Jared McCann would easily be there had he been healthy all season) and only Eberle has reached 20 goals. While the Kraken have a by-committee approach offensively, a legitimate top-six addition could go a long way toward bolstering their playoff odds, should GM Jason Botterill decide to be a buyer.
Penalty Killing Help: For all of the improved defensive play (and goaltending), one goal prevention area that still needs work is the penalty kill. They’re down nearly 6% from last season, checking in at just 71.4%, narrowly better than Vancouver who sits dead last. They’ve yet to score at four-on-five and generate the fewest shot attempts of any team in the league and the sit-back approach hasn’t quite worked. Given the importance of special teams in the playoffs, upgrading a player or two on the penalty kill – even if it’s their fourth-line or third-pairing options – could be enough of an improvement to see some legitimate improvement on that front.
Photo courtesy of Brett Holmes-Imagn Images.
Trade Deadline Primer: San Jose Sharks
With the Olympic break now over, the trade deadline is almost a week away. Where does each team stand, and what moves should they be looking to make? We continue our look around the league with teams in the fight for a playoff spot, next up with the Sharks.
The Sharks spent much of last summer bolstering their lineup to protect some of their young stars. So far this season, the additions have worked out well, and the Sharks remain in playoff contention with a third of the season remaining. San Jose management likely didn’t expect this team to be in playoff contention, but second-year superstar Macklin Celebrini has taken massive steps forward in his development, putting the team ahead of schedule in its rebuild. It should be fascinating to see how Sharks general manager Mike Grier responds to a team that wasn’t expected to be in playoff contention.
Record
27-24-4, 6th in the Pacific
Deadline Status
Conservative Buyer
Deadline Cap Space
$641K on deadline day, 2/3 retention slots used, 48/50 contracts used, per PuckPedia.
Upcoming Draft Picks
2026: SJ 1st, EDM 1st, COL 2nd, FLA 4th, MTL 5th, PHI 6th, SJ 7th
2027: SJ 1st, SJ 4th, CHI 5th, SJ 6th,
Trade Chips
For a team just emerging from a rebuild, the Sharks don’t have many draft picks in the next two drafts. That said, they have arguably the best prospect pool in the NHL, though it will likely fall down the list as prospects are traded and others graduate into full-time NHLers. The Sharks are in an interesting spot heading into the deadline, as they could do some buying, but also move out one or more of their pending UFA defensemen who don’t fit management’s long-term plans.
Veteran defenseman Mario Ferraro is a good place to start, as he is a UFA at the end of the season. While the Sharks likely aren’t interested in being sellers this season, Ferraro will have significant value at the deadline and could give the Sharks more future pieces to add to their already deep cupboard of future assets. There is an outside chance that San Jose locks him up, as they reportedly have interest in a shorter-term deal with Ferraro, which would make sense given that he is just 27 years old, is one of the team’s leaders, and should have some good years in front of him. Ferraro isn’t overly skilled, but he has a high hockey IQ and is solid in the defensive zone as well as on the penalty kill. Ferraro isn’t a top-pairing presence on the blue line, but he does throw the body around and is a very quick skater, which helps with puck retrieval and getting the puck out of the defensive zone. Ferraro won’t net a top-end asset in a trade, but he is the kind of player teams covet for bottom-pairing and penalty-killing roles come playoff time.
John Klingberg and Vincent Desharnais are two other veteran defensemen on expiring deals who could be moved if the Sharks fall out of playoff contention or acquire younger defensemen and have a surplus. Klingberg has had a resurgence this season in San Jose, playing over 21 minutes a night and scoring at a 40-point pace for the first time in years. The 33-year-old signed a one-year deal with the Sharks this season, and the plan at the time was likely to move him to a playoff contender once San Jose fell out of playoff contention. However, that time hasn’t come yet, and the Sharks remain within striking distance, which could complicate matters. The allure for San Jose to move Klingberg will be a market that should heavily favor sellers, as so few teams have punted on this season and are selling off.
When it comes to moving young players, it doesn’t seem San Jose is in a position to move the likes of Michael Misa, Will Smith, Sam Dickinson, or any of their top young prospects. Further down the depth chart, the Sharks could move a prospect such as goaltender Joshua Ravensbergen, whom they selected late in the first round of the 2025 NHL Entry Draft (30th overall). Ravensbergen has great size at 6’5” and moves very well, though he will look to fill out more in the coming years. He is positionally sound and reads the play extremely well for a young goaltender.
It was surprising to see San Jose draft Ravensbergen last year, given that they already have Yaroslav Askarov in the fold. However, given the unpredictability of the goaltending position, the Sharks felt it was a worthwhile bet to add another highly touted goaltending prospect. GM Mike Grier probably isn’t in a hurry to deal Ravensbergen, given that his junior numbers haven’t been great and he has significant untapped potential. If the right move comes along to acquire more developed young players, Grier might feel inclined to pull the trigger on a trade.
Team Needs
A Right Shot Defenseman: The Sharks were reportedly in on New Jersey defenseman Dougie Hamilton last summer, but didn’t work out a deal. It’s unclear whether they would still have interest, but if they did, a deal for Hamilton would instantly make him their best puck-moving defenseman. That’s less a credit to Hamilton and more a reflection of the offensive capabilities of the Sharks’ current defensive unit. San Jose badly needs a defenseman, ideally on the right side, who can contribute to the offense. It’s hard to gauge whether Grier is desperate enough to go back to Hamilton, but it seems likely he would prefer to acquire a younger player who can grow with the team’s young core and be part of what could be a very special run in San Jose.
A Middle Six Forward: The Sharks were also reportedly interested in forward Artemi Panarin before he was dealt to the Los Angeles Kings, underscoring that the Sharks recognize they need more depth at forward. San Jose could use help in its middle six, and it has already addressed this issue to a degree by acquiring Kiefer Sherwood from the Vancouver Canucks. Despite the Sherwood addition, the Sharks are still regularly deploying Collin Graf and Philipp Kurashev in their top nine, which is less than ideal for a team with playoff aspirations. No disrespect to Graf or Kurashev, who are both having a great year as younger players, but their spots in the forward group highlight a lack of depth at the position. San Jose could make a top-nine pickup to give their forward group more balance and ultimately a better chance to win on a nightly basis.