Ryan Shea Is Going To Get A Big Raise This Summer

Saying that Penguins defenseman Ryan Shea is having a career year would be a massive understatement. The 28-year-old has two goals and 14 assists in 41 games, is a +15, and averages over 19 minutes a night.

While plus/minus is a flawed statistic, it is eye-opening to see it that high. Shea has played up and down the Penguins’ defense this season, pairing with the likes of Kris Letang, Jack St. Ivany, Harrison Brunicke, and Parker Wotherspoon. No disrespect to any of those players, but St. Ivany has been a tweener to this point in his career, Brunicke is back playing in the World Juniors, and Letang has been a mess defensively for most of the year, making the +15 all the more impressive.

Shea spent much of the season paired with Letang, but in the last week, Shea and St. Ivany have formed an effective shutdown pairing for the Penguins, coinciding with an intense stretch of play for the team. Shea’s adaptability and offensive emergence couldn’t have come at a better time for the three-year NHL pro, as he is slated to be an unrestricted free agent on July 1 and is set to earn a healthy raise from the $900K he is making this year.

Shea signed that one-year deal last March, and it seemed like an odd bit of business for the Penguins at the time, as they were busy selling off at the trade deadline and Shea was a candidate to be moved. Pittsburgh general manager Kyle Dubas clearly saw something he liked in Shea’s game and gave him a raise and guaranteed NHL money for this season in an extension that has been a windfall for Pittsburgh at a time when they needed a left-handed defenseman to step up and fill a massive weakness.

Not only did Shea step up, but he also effectively became the type of player Pittsburgh needed to acquire if they wanted to contend for a playoff spot, which may or may not have been the plan. Regardless of the intentions, Pittsburgh is in the playoff hunt, and Shea has been a massive part of that.

So, what is the plan for Shea now? That is the million-dollar question, or in Shea’s case, the multi-million-dollar question.

At the beginning of the season, AFP Analytics projected a one-year deal worth $1.075MM for Shea next season. That number is obviously going to be different now, but it’s fair to wonder how different it will be.

Shea has a lot working in his favor in his contract negotiations. He is still relatively young, doesn’t have a lot of NHL mileage on his body, and capable defensemen are always in demand.

Just look at one of his predecessors as Letang’s partner, Brian Dumoulin, who is much older and worn down, and who got three years and $12MM as a UFA last summer. On the flip side, Shea doesn’t have a long NHL resume, having played 111 games and entering his third season.

He also doesn’t have a track record as an impact defender outside this year. Shea had pedestrian results last season in 39 games, posting two goals and three assists, but he was leaned on heavily defensively. He didn’t have too many opportunities to chip in offensively.

His free agency is going to get interesting over the next two months, particularly if the Penguins stay in contention for a playoff spot and opt to hold onto him. Pittsburgh gave Shea his NHL opportunity, signing him to NHL money before he ever played an NHL game, demonstrating faith in his ability to become an NHL defenseman.

That 2023 signing showed absolute trust from Dubas and the Penguins, and it makes one wonder whether Shea will reward the team with a discount in negotiations. There is also a precise fit for both Shea and the team.

He fills a need well, and even on an extension, he won’t cost more than a potential replacement would in free agency or a trade. That said, there is always a risk in signing a one-hit wonder, as his play could be a mirage, and you end up locked in long-term with a player who can’t cut it in the NHL.

If the Penguins fall out of contention, on the other hand, it could change the complexion of Shea’s future, particularly if they deal him to a different team. Therein lies the risk for Shea, because if he gets traded elsewhere and falls flat on his face, it would pretty much tank his prospects for a long-term deal on the open market. But if he gets moved and succeeds, it removes a significant question mark surrounding him.

It remains to be seen whether Pittsburgh will even deal Shea if they fall out of contention. They didn’t last year, when Shea was more of an unknown, and it would seem silly to trade him now, when you have a better idea of what he can be in the NHL.

Pittsburgh might just sign him even if they fall out of contention, because they have the cap space and know what they have in Shea. They also have a ton of other pending UFA defensemen who don’t figure to be part of their future, and they could move those instead.

What could Shea be looking at in terms of a contract extension? It’s hard to predict, given the current economic climate.

Still, there are a couple of comparables, such as the Flyers’ Emil Andrae and the Flames’ Jake Bean. AFP Analytics has Bean pegged for a two-year deal worth $2.25MM per season, while Andrae is projected at $1.7MM AAV on a two-year deal. Declan Chisholm of the Capitals is another decent comparison in terms of career numbers. He signed his contract extension as an RFA, inking a two-year deal worth $1.6MM annually.

The issue with the Chisholm comparison is that he was an RFA, while Shea is unrestricted. However, using the framework of all the aforementioned contracts, it seems likely that Shea is headed for a two-year deal, possibly three, at a rate that probably tops the Bean projection.

However, this is the NHL, and it wouldn’t be shocking to see Shea sign a four-year deal worth $3MM or more annually, given the surging salary cap and teams’ desperation for reliable defenseman.

Image courtesy of Charles LeClaire-Imagn Images.

The Blackhawks Already Have A Top Line Winger On The Way

Since the Blackhawks selected Connor Bedard first overall in 2023, the most glaring holes on their depth chart have been the two wing spots next to him.

Bedard’s most common linemates at 5-on-5 in year one were Nick Foligno and Philipp Kurashev. In year two, amid a never-ending rotation, Ryan Donato and Ilya Mikheyev eked out the honors.

This year, it’s André Burakovsky and rookie Ryan Greene. The 20-year-old’s continued emergence into a top-tier superstar and increased defensive commitment this season have helped fuel a resurgence for the former, with Burakovsky’s nine goals and 23 points in 34 games on pace for his highest totals in three years. Greene, only one year older than Bedard, is up to 14 points in 39 games after a recent hot streak.

Of course, Bedard’s 44 points on the year are still nearly twice what his best support man, Burakovsky, has posted, despite missing the last several games with a shoulder injury. While Chicago’s early hot start offered some promise, it’s clear now that was a Spencer Knight-fueled mirage as they’ve slipped back to being one point out of last place. As for Bedard and his support system, the talent gap has never been more apparent – even Kurashev and Donato finished within spitting distance for the team lead in points in 2023-24 and 2024-25, respectively.

With a top-two pick spent on Artyom Levshunov and an elite young netminder acquired in Knight, Chicago has stars lined up at every position – except for Bedard’s linemates, if only looking at the NHL roster for the past few years is any indication.

In reality, the pieces to complete an era-defining forward line for the Hawks are already in place and won’t necessarily require the big free-agent splash that some were hoping for this year or last. One of them comes down to a math problem. In the early stages of their careers, Chicago has preferred to keep Frank Nazar separate from Bedard at 5-on-5 and have them each center their own lines. That’s largely worked out well with Nazar on a 52-point pace in his second NHL season.

Center Anton Frondell is on the way as well after being drafted third overall last year. With 10 goals and 15 points in 25 games for Djurgårdens IF in a challenging European pro environment in the SHL, he will almost certainly be a top-six option for the Blackhawks in 2026-27. Neither he, Bedard, nor Nazar is suited for third-line duties long-term. One of them will slot in on Bedard’s wing next season.

The premise of this article could all be for naught if the Hawks end up with another lottery pick in this year’s draft. Their selection would almost undoubtedly be either Gavin McKenna or Ivar Stenberg, both wingers with the skill level to drop in as a Bedard running mate out of camp. But if the balls don’t bounce their way, there’s an in-house candidate who will likely get a shot with a mix of Bedard, Frondell, and Nazar next fall.

Roman Kantserov has long been overlooked as an impact piece. Perhaps that’s simply because Chicago’s wealth of draft picks over the past several years has created one of the deepest pools in recent memory.

The 2023 second-round pick wasn’t viewed as much of a draft steal at the time. He was the 16th-ranked European skater by NHL Central Scouting, and only one major public scouting service had him as a late first-rounder (some even had him in the third).

No longer can he be ignored. Fast forward three years, and the 21-year-old is already a champion and an All-Star in Russia’s Kontinental Hockey League, a top-three competition in the world. Even that doesn’t give proper credence to what the undersized but extremely high-motor winger has brought to the table this season. With a 26-19–45 scoring line in 38 games, he’s third in the KHL in scoring and is first in pure goal-scoring. If that holds, he will break Kirill Kaprizov‘s record as the youngest single-season goal-scoring leader, albeit only by a few months.

McKeen’s Hockey tabbed Kantserov as the No. 8 prospect in the Hawks’ pool entering the season and profiled him as a “high-energy, third-line grinder with the potential to contribute offensively.” He’s answered the bell on the last part of that sentence as best as he possibly can before making the jump from Russia. Pairing two sub-6’0″ players on a top line may be an area of concern, but his pace and physicality make him a near-perfect stylistic complement for Bedard, with his historic overseas production suggesting he boasts much more upward mobility in their lineup than some thought.

Kantserov is in the final season of his contract with Metallurg Magnitogorsk. Technically, his contractual obligations won’t conclude until May 31, but KHL clubs have shown some degree of willingness to release players a few weeks early – assuming their season is over – to sign NHL entry-level contracts. Whether that’s something Chicago wants to pursue to get Kantserov in the lineup for the final few games of the regular season remains to be seen. It should be a foregone conclusion, though, that he will be given a lengthy runway to add his name to Chicago’s long list of young, NHL-ready stars come September.

Big Hype Prospects: Zharovsky, Barlow, Nestrasil, Zajicek

Welcome to PHR’s Big Hype Prospects series. Like the MLB Trade Rumors series of the same name, we’re taking a look at the performances of top prospects from across the hockey world. We’ll look at drafted prospects who are rising, others who are struggling, and prospects for the upcoming draft who are notable.

Four Big Hype Prospects

Alexander Zharovsky, RW, Montreal Canadiens (Ufa Salavat Yulayev, KHL)
31 GP 11G 17A 28pts

The Montreal Canadiens are currently benefiting greatly from the nightly performances of star rookie Ivan Demidov, a hugely talented Russian winger with the kind of offensive ability that can dazzle fans on a nightly basis. Demidov’s excellent rookie season does not come as a huge surprise to most, as just last season he managed to lead his KHL team in scoring — a hugely impressive feat for an 18-year-old player.

And yet Demidov may not be the only Canadiens prospect to accomplish that feat. Zharovsky, the club’s top selection at the 2025 NHL Entry Draft, currently leads the KHL’s Ufa Salavat Yulayev in scoring with 28 points in 31 games. The next-highest scorer, veteran Jack Rodewald, has 25 points in 39 games. Just one other player on the team has reached the 20-point mark.

The fact that Demidov led SKA in scoring last season threatens to leave Canadiens fans somewhat jaded at the prospect of another youngster leading his KHL team in scoring. But they should be reminded that the KHL, Russia’s top professional league, is a circuit with a longstanding reputation of being notoriously difficult for teenage players to gain a foothold in. Demidov himself had to contend with this, sometimes finding himself in an extremely limited role in SKA’s lineup despite his obvious talent.

Zharovsky’s brilliant 2025-26 campaign thus far has served as a clear indication that the Canadiens likely nabbed a first-round caliber talent in the early portion of the second round of the draft. Zharovsky was one of the fastest-rising players of last year’s draft process. He barely registered on scouting radars early last season. NHL Central Scouting did not include him on their preliminary watch list last October, nor was he ranked in the midterm rankings in January. Central Scouting caught onto Zharovsky by the end of the season, ranking him No. 5 among international skaters in their final rankings.

Most public-facing outlets had Zharovsky ranked in the early to middle portion of the second round of the draft, as high as No. 35 (TSN’s Bob McKenzie) and as low as No. 49 (Corey Pronman of The Athletic). In his ranking, Pronman wrote that while Zharovsky’s MHL production “needs to be looked at with a grain of salt,” due to the fact that he managed those numbers “in the clear worst division in that league.” He finished writing Zharovsky “could be a bottom six wing,” but it’s clear the Canadiens disagreed.

In their media availability following the draft, the Canadiens’ co-directors of amateur scouting Nick Bobrov and Martin Lapointe indicated to the media that not only did they project Zharovsky as a future top-six winger, but they also had him ranked on their draft board inside the first round, right around the slot of the two first-round picks they ultimately dealt to the New York Islanders in the Noah Dobson trade.

While it’s still far too early to tell whether Zharovsky will live up to the Canadiens’ expectations or fall more in line with Pronman’s projection, the early returns have been extremely promising for Montreal. Just as he did in the MHL, Zharovsky’s KHL performance will likely be met with some skepticism due to the fact that the division Zharovsky plays in, the Chernyshev Division, is arguably the league’s weakest.

But it is nonetheless extremely impressive to see a winger of Zharovsky’s age lead his team in scoring in his rookie KHL campaign. Zharovsky was named a KHL All-Star and the league’s rookie of the month for October and November. He ranks second in scoring in the KHL among all players aged 22 and younger, behind only Chicago Blackhawks prospect Roman Kantserov, who is 21 years old. While we won’t know for some time whether Zharovsky will truly end up as the top-six offensive talent the Canadiens believe he can be, his progression at the moment has been highly encouraging.

Colby Barlow, RW, Winnipeg Jets (Manitoba Moose, AHL)
25 GP 2G 3A 5pts

Of the first 20 picks of the 2023 NHL Entry Draft, just four selected players have yet to make their NHL debut: No. 5 pick David Reinbacher (MTL), No. 14 pick Brayden Yager (PIT, traded to WPG), No. 18 pick Barlow (WPG), and No. 20 pick Eduard Sale (SEA). While the pace of a prospect’s development is no sure indicator of that player’s future NHL success, and it must be repeatedly emphasized that player development is not a linear process, it is still notable when a highly-drafted prospect begins to fall behind his peers.

In Barlow’s case, he appears to have fallen behind quite considerably. This is actually not the first time Barlow has appeared in the Big Hype Prospects series, as he also was covered in a September 2024 article written by colleague Gabe Foley. Foley correctly noted that Barlow was a lock to be traded from his OHL team at the time (the Owen Sound Attack) and expressed some hope that the expected OHL trade would provide Barlow with some much-needed momentum in his final year before turning pro.

While OHL trades provided a spark for other CHL first-rounders to have hugely productive final campaigns in junior hockey (Conor Geekie and Matthew Savoie were two names specifically referenced by Foley) that didn’t happen for Barlow, who scored 32 goals and 61 points in 62 games as a member of the Oshawa Generals.

While Barlow did score at a higher rate in the second half of the year, and did follow up the regular season with a stellar postseason run (33 points in just 21 games), it appears he hasn’t been able to translate that momentum into tangible production to start his pro career.

Barlow is now 25 games into his first full season in the AHL, and he’s managed just five points.

The 20-year-old has long been viewed as a potential NHL sniper, with his shot credited as one of his standout tools. Pronman wrote in August that “Barlow’s calling card is his shot” but noted that “his offensive inconsistency is a concern.”

Elite Prospects’ Lauren Kelly wrote around the same time that Barlow’s “playmaking showed significant growth” in Oshawa, and that the development “bodes well for his move to the AHL.”

Breaking down exactly why Barlow’s offensive momentum appears to have stalled at the AHL level isn’t a simple task. He does get to play with some talented linemates, currently skating alongside 2022 first-rounder Brad Lambert and 2021 second-rounder Nikita Chibrikov.

But neither Lambert nor Chibrikov have been particularly productive this season. Despite having linemates that are, on paper, of high quality, Barlow hasn’t had the chance to play all that much this season. He ranks last in average ice time per game among all Moose skaters with at least 20 games played this season.

Given Barlow’s struggles in his rookie AHL campaign and the Moose’s apparent reluctance to play him higher in the lineup on a regular basis, it could be that a change of scenery ends up the best outcome for both Barlow and Winnipeg.

Barlow has, without question, thus far failed to live up to the Jets’ investment of a first-round pick in him. And Barlow could argue that the Jets have similarly failed to give him the kind of high-minute AHL role that would allow him to build momentum early in his pro career.

As the Jets look to plot their way forward amidst a deeply disappointing 2025-26 NHL campaign, they could seek to acquire reinforcements for their NHL roster via trade. If they end up doing so, Barlow could be one of the top prospects the Jets elect to trade in one of those transactions.

Vaclav Nestrasil, RW, Chicago Blackhawks (UMass Amherst, NCAA)
18 GP 10G 10A 20pts

If there’s one single player archetype that is most widely coveted across the NHL, a strong argument could be made that it’s a forward who combines devastating size and physicality with a high level of offensive skill. Those players come few and far between, and when one manages to establish himself at the NHL level, there’s usually no shortage of teams trying to line up to acquire his services.

Selected No. 25 overall at the 2025 NHL Entry Draft, Nestrasil has a very real chance of becoming that kind of player at the NHL level. The 6’5″, 190-pound winger still has a ways to go in terms of his physical development to reach that point, but the start to his collegiate career has been extremely impressive.

The Blackhawks’ selection of Nestrasil No. 25 overall was met with some skepticism. The player managed only 42 points in 61 USHL contests as a member of the Muskegon Lumberjacks, which is below the typically expected level of production for a first-round pick.

Though Nestrasil’s 13 points in 14 playoff games did help Muskegon win the Clark Cup Championship, his eventual draft ranking varied wildly in the public sphere. The team at Elite Prospects ranked him No. 26 on their board, but most other outlets ranked him somewhere in the 35-45 range. He was even ranked as low as No. 65, by TSN’s Craig Button.

While most scouts commended Nestrasil’s energy level, non-stop motor, and ability to impact a game even when he couldn’t score, many questioned whether he’d be able to bring a level of consistent production that would justify the investment of a first-round draft choice.

Nestrasil’s first 18 games of college hockey have gone a long way towards addressing — but not permanently silencing — those skeptics. He has managed 10 goals and 18 points, good for second on the team behind undrafted 22-year-old Jack Musa.

Because other freshmen players are also having an incredible start to their NCAA career (Pittsburgh Penguins 2025 first-rounder Will Horcoff has 19 goals in his first 20 games, for example), Nestrasil’s sharp improvement in offensive production over last season has flown more under the radar than it perhaps deserves to. But if any Blackhawks fans decide to tune into Amherst games this season, it’s possible they could be watching a long-term linemate for franchise face Connor Bedard.

The team is still searching for long-term pieces to pair Bedard with, and Nestrasil’s compete level, size, physicality, and offensive touch could complement the star center quite well. There’s still a ways to go before Nestrasil reaches that point, but so far in his NCAA career, Nestrasil’s stock appears to be rapidly rising.

Simon Zajicek, G, Boston Bruins (Providence Bruins, AHL)
12 GP  10-1-1, .934 sv% /1.93 GAA

The history of free agent imports from European professional leagues is a spotty one. Where there have been teams that have found considerable success bringing over star players from top European pro circuits, others have seen their investments flame out and quickly return to the other side of the Atlantic. For every Karel Vejmelka or Alexander Radulov there appears to be five Jan Kovar‘s or Jakub Jerabek‘s.

The Bruins have traded away a considerable number of draft picks over the last half-decade as a result of the organization’s push to win the Stanley Cup within that time frame. Those moves have depleted the Bruins’ prospect pool, and left their scouts with fewer resources at their disposal to replenish that pool of prospects.

One route organizations in that sort of a position often take to try to maintain a pipeline of young players despite having fewer draft picks is signing free agent players from the NCAA, the CHL, or the European pro circuit. Edmonton Oilers GM Stan Bowman is an example of a hockey operations executive that has been aggressive in his targeting of European free agents, and he had some success doing so with the Chicago Blackhawks, landing long-term NHL players such as Antti Raanta, Erik Gustafsson, and most notably, Artemi Panarin.

The Bruins appeared to try to replicate his approach this past summer when they signed Zajicek, a netminder from the Czech Extraliga. In his age-23 season, Zajicek led the Extraliga in save percentage, putting up a .930 mark across 29 games played. The year prior, he posted a .909 save percentage across 20 games for HC Litvínov.

Zajicek was signed to form a tandem with AHL star Michael DiPietro, and despite his inexperience in North American pro hockey, Zajicek has been stellar to start his AHL career. Through 12 games, Zajicek has gone 10-1-1 with a .934 save percentage. His performance, along with the strong performances of DiPietro, have helped Providence rank No. 2 in the AHL in fewest goals surrendered so far in 2025-26.

While it’s too early to tell whether Zajicek’s performance is truly a reflection of a promising NHL future or more of a product of a high-quality defensive environment around him, his stellar form to start the year does suggest that he may end up making a push for an NHL role in Boston or somewhere where there is more of a pressing need for goaltending.

Photos courtesy of Perry Nelson-Imagn Images

2025-26 In-Season NHL Trades

Pro Hockey Rumors will keep track of all trades made during the 2025-26 campaign, right up until the last day of the regular season, updating this post with each transaction.

Trades are listed here in reverse-chronological order, with the latest at the top. So, if a player has been traded multiple times, the first team listed as having acquired him is the one that ended up with him. If a trade has not yet been formally finalized, it will be listed in italics. The terms or structures of those deals could still change before they’re officially completed.

For our full story on each trade, click on the date above it. We’ll continue to update this list with the latest specific details on picks and other compensation, as they’re reported.

You can reference this post under the “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” menu on the right sidebar on desktop or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu.

Here’s the full list of the NHL’s 2025-26 in-season trades:

Updated Jan. 8, 2026 (2:23 p.m.)


January 8

  • Sharks acquire D Nolan Allan, G Laurent Brossoit, and the Blackhawks’ 2028 seventh-round pick.
  • Blackhawks acquire D Ryan Ellis, D Jake Furlong, and the Sharks’ 2028 fourth-round pick.

January 6

  • Hurricanes acquire D Juuso Välimäki.
  • Mammoth acquires future considerations.

December 31

December 29

  • Penguins acquire RW Yegor Chinakhov.
  • Blue Jackets acquire LW Danton Heinen, the Blues’ 2026 second-round pick, and the Capitals’ 2027 third-round pick.

December 28

December 19

  • Blue Jackets acquire LW Mason Marchment.
  • Kraken acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2027 second-round pick and the Rangers’ 2026 fourth-round pick.

December 19

  • Canadiens acquire C Phillip Danault.
  • Kings acquire the Blue Jackets’ 2026 second-round pick.

December 12

December 12

December 12

  • Oilers acquire D Spencer Stastney.
  • Predators acquire the Oilers’ 2027 third-round pick.

Read more

Players On 2026 World Juniors Rosters By NHL Team

This year’s World Juniors kick off in just over an hour with a Group A clash between Sweden and Slovakia in St. Paul. With all 10 countries’ rosters locked in, it’s time to look at which prospects each NHL team will see representing them on the world’s biggest stage for under-20 players.

Only three teams – the Blue Jackets, Golden Knights, and Hurricanes – do not have a representative on an opening roster. The Mammoth and Predators lead the way with seven prospects each, while the Canadiens, Capitals, Ducks, Flyers, Islanders, Red Wings, and Sharks are other teams with five-plus.

Anaheim Ducks

Boston Bruins

Buffalo Sabres

Calgary Flames

Carolina Hurricanes

none

Chicago Blackhawks

Read more

PHR Mailbag: Kraken, Player Development, Blackhawks, Bad Contracts, Flyers

Topics in this edition of the PHR Mailbag include which of Seattle’s pending UFAs could be on the move, if some Chicago prospects could join the team this season, and more.  If your question doesn’t appear here, check back in our last two mailbag columns.

yeasties: The Kraken appear to be positioned well to be a deadline seller. Assuming they sputter out and become sellers, which of their pending UFAs do you think will be dealt and who will be kept and extended?

For those who aren’t too familiar with Seattle’s pending UFA list, it’s quite a big one, even after they moved Mason Marchment to Columbus on Friday before the roster freeze.  Up front, they have Jaden Schwartz, Jordan Eberle, and Eeli Tolvanen all set to hit the market in July.  They also have Jamie Oleksiak on the back end and since goaltender Matt Murray has been in the NHL all season, I’ll give him a mention here as well although I wouldn’t be shocked if he doesn’t get re-signed or traded by the early-March trade deadline.

Oleksiak is the one I’m most confident in saying will be moved.  His role on the depth chart has been reduced and it’s hard to imagine they’ll want to sign him to another multi-year deal around this price point.  On the other hand, teams want big defensemen with some snarl at the deadline and Oleksiak provides that.  Despite being in the midst of a down year, I expect they’ll get a strong market for his services.

Up front, I’d put Schwartz as the most likely to be dealt.  He has had some good moments when healthy (including this season) but he can’t stay healthy.  However, with salary retention, some contender will want him as a middle-six upgrade to bolster their offensive depth and maybe play on the power play.  On the flip side, I think Eberle stays.  Yes, he could go be a middle-six player somewhere but I think they’ll want to keep him around, assuming a reasonable extension could be worked out.

I could see Seattle taking a run at re-signing Tolvanen.  He isn’t having a great year so maybe they look to try to get him at a lower-market rate.  Failing that, he still has enough of a track record that there should be some teams that like him as more of a depth addition.

frozenaquatic: I hear a lot about prospect development with how bad the team I root for (the Rangers) is at it. I had heard that Tanner Glass and Jed Ortmeyer, two plugs, were in charge of “player development,” but saw some folks talking about how that just meant they were in charge of making sure prospects had proper housing and resources to financial management and things like that, and that they weren’t really coaches. I always hear the refrain that the “NHL isn’t a development league” in the sense that coaches aren’t expected to coddle young players (unless they’re in a full rebuild).

My question is: if a team has “bad player development,” is that more on the Department of Player Development, the scouts, the AHL coaches? Maybe even the skills coach? Let’s say, for instance, the Rangers wanted to get better at “player development” overall. Would that be an overhaul of the scouting department to look for different baseline skills in players? Or something else? I’m thinking of how Laf, Kakko, Kravtsov, Andersson, etc all panned out–is that just horrible scouting, terrible luck, or the mysterious player development?

In recent years, it feels like a lot of teams are adding Player Development coaches.  But most of the time, those are recently retired players.  It feels like these positions are created to give them a chance to see if a coaching position is something they might be interested in.  Meanwhile, they get to relay some pointers to the prospects and help them along.  From a starting point, that’s not a bad thing to have and it does allow those former players to slowly improve those coaching skills.  Ideally, you might want to have someone (or more) who can work on more specialized training for each player to maximize those efforts but Glass and Ortmeyer can certainly be part of a quality department.

As for where the blame might lie when it comes to a lack of proper player development, there’s plenty to go around.  The scouts may have misread the projectability of certain skills although I won’t critique them for the first two on that list as they were largely consensus picks at where they were selected.  Did the Player Development department work enough with the players?  I’d lump the skills coaches into that area in terms of coming up with the proper training regimens.  Then you have the coaching staffs at both the AHL and NHL levels.  Yes, the NHL is not a development league in theory but the reality is, a lot of development does happen at the top level.  Some of it also has to fall on the players.  Some train better than others over the offseason, some are more dedicated to the finer points of development.  I’m speaking generally here, not talking specifically about any of the players you listed.

There’s no simple fix or overhaul here.  Scouts can be evaluated based on their reports; did those players progress over time?  Keep the best ones and if there are some who haven’t been as strong, then you could look to make a change.  The same goes in the development department (more teams seem to be drifting toward adding more people rather than changing some) and with the coaching staffs although they have to balance winning and development at the same time.  In a perfect world, it’s probably a slow build over making a bunch of changes all at once.

Unclemike1526: Do you know when the KHL and SHL seasons end? Frondell will definitely be here after that and depending on whether the Hawks still have a shot at the Playoffs and could play more than 10 games and burn his 1st year of his ELC. Kantserov is not eligible for an ELC but hopefully comes over here and could help also. I doubt the Hawks will let Frondell play more than 10 games if they’re out of it entirely. They could use his size either on the wing or even at C. What do you think?

The KHL regular season ends on March 20th while the SHL ends on March 14th.  Also worth noting, last year, the KHL playoffs ended on May 21st and the SHL ended on May 1st.

Chicago has fallen off a bit since the callout for questions and are now hovering near the bottom of the league and don’t have Connor Bedard.  As things stand, I don’t think the playoffs are a realistic possibility.  However, there’s an outside shot that Anton Frondell could get in a game or two depending on how Djurgardens fares in the playoffs.  There probably won’t be more than ten games left by then so they’re not at risk of burning a year of his entry-level deal.

Roman Kantersov is actually eligible for an entry-level contract as he’s only 21.  It will just be a two-year pact instead of three.  But it might not matter anyway as Magnitogorsk is the top team in the league and likely heading for a long playoff run.  If they went out early enough, it’s possible they’d sign him and burn a year now.  They wouldn’t want to do that but that might be needed to convince him to sign, knowing he could exit the entry-level restrictions a year earlier.  I wouldn’t expect that to come into play but we’ll see what happens in the playoffs.

tucsontoro: Brian – we’re already hearing lots of chatter on who might be on the move. What do you consider the worst contracts in the league right now?

I don’t think the players on the worst contracts in the league are probably going to be on the move but let’s go over some of the bad ones.

Jonathan Huberdeau’s contract with Calgary has to be here.  Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t hate the trade for the Flames at the time it was made.  Getting what we thought was still a top-line winger and a strong defenseman wasn’t a bad return for Matthew Tkachuk.  Of course, Huberdeau is being paid like his best year with Florida while producing about half of the points, making it a well-above-market deal.  There’s a temptation to put Elias Pettersson here on the first year of his new contract but let’s let the season play out and see how he fares as the undisputed top player in Vancouver now.

On the back end, Darnell Nurse is being paid as an elite two-way defender.  He hasn’t been that.  Offensively, he’s more of a third option with them needing to pay to bring in Jake Walman to pick up some of the secondary slack since Nurse wasn’t producing.  Defensively, elite is not the word I would use.  He’s a serviceable top-four defender, sure, but not a number one like he’s being paid as.  On the lower end of the scale, Ryan Graves started the season in the minors after clearing waivers and is now a sixth or seventh option on most nights.  He still has three years left at $4.5MM and even if the Penguins retained the maximum 50%, there still wouldn’t be a trade market for him.

Now, since you referenced this question after mentioning chatter about players who could be on the move, I wanted to think of some bad contracts that could be dealt.  One that comes to mind is Barclay Goodrow.  He’s on an expiring deal at $3.64MM and is a fourth liner.  However, he’s the type of gritty role player some teams will covet and if there’s one with a lot of cap space, I could see him moving.  I’m also wondering about Patrik Laine ($8.7MM, pending UFA) in Montreal.  Since they’ve gone and added Alexandre Texier and Phillip Danault, is there a spot for him when the team is fully healthy?  If not, it wouldn’t shock me to see them try to move him with half retention to give him a chance to play down the stretch and help his case in free agency.  The return would be minimal but after blowing through their remaining room to add Danault, clearing half of Laine’s deal would give them some extra flexibility.

Emoney123: What’s the next move for Danny Briere? Seems Martone, Nesbitt, Luchanko, Bump, Barkey, and Bjarnason are a few years away and with only their own #1 pick this year, how does Briere keep the Flyers in the playoff hunt? Seen this before with big crash and burn late in the second half of the season. Rick Tocchet for Coach of the Year if the Flyers make playoffs?

Right now, the next move is likely patience.  At the moment, Philadelphia is right in the thick of the playoff race, one that no one seems to be making a push to run away with.  It’s great that they’re in it right now but will they still be in the hunt at the Olympic break?  I think that’s going to be the decision point for a lot of teams as to whether to buy, sell, or largely stand pat and the Flyers should be one of those.

If I’m being honest, I’m not sold on them being a viable playoff threat.  A bunch of overtime games have kept them in the mix which is fine but not necessarily sustainable over the course of a full season.  Accordingly, my inclination is that they largely hold or sell a bit, depending on if they can get Christian Dvorak signed to a contract extension or not in the new year.

That said, you asked me about a playoff scenario so there are two buying scenarios I can think of.  One I’ve written about in an older mailbag column and that’s one that sees them buying low on someone who could be around beyond the season.  In other words, another Trevor Zegras type of move where you’re hoping a change of scenery gets them going while knowing that a futures payment is justifiable given that the player isn’t a rental.  That’s still on the table.

The other one is where they’re a soft buyer and basically tell teams that they’ll take a contract off their hands.  With double retention off the table now, other buyers will need to move some bodies out to make the money work for other trades.  This is a good spot for GM Daniel Briere to tell teams that they can facilitate one of those moves by taking an expiring contract back.  Ideally, the player is a forward with a bit of offensive upside.  Frankly, the Laine scenario I mentioned above feels like something worthwhile doing in this instance, flipping a minor leaguer or futures in return.  It’s something that doesn’t jeopardize the future and sends a message to the players that they’re not giving up.  It’s not the route I’d probably go but if they’re buying, I think it’s going to be low-cost acquisitions that don’t jeopardize the future.

Read more

NHL Players Who Can Veto Trades In 2025-26

Trade and movement protection is becoming increasingly common in the NHL. There are three forms. A no-movement clause, in addition to giving the player the right to veto any trade, allows them to block waiver placements and subsequent minor-league reassignments as well. No-trade clauses are the simplest, giving the player full veto power over a trade, but also the rarest.

The most common form of trade protection is the modified no-trade clause, which allows a player to submit a list of teams they can or can’t be traded to. An M-NTC can also include kicker dates that change the level of protection the player has. Most every team has at least one of these on their books.

To be eligible for an NMC, NTC, or M-NTC, the player must be at least 27 years old at the beginning of the league year or have accumulated seven years of service – in other words, the same requirements for unrestricted free agency.

With those criteria in mind, here are the players who must give their consent to some degree if their teams want to trade them during the 2025-26 league year. Players with M-NTCs have the amount of teams they can block a trade to in parentheses (with noted exceptions for rare ‘yes’ or approved trade lists).


Anaheim Ducks

No-movement clauses: none

No-trade clauses:

Modified no-trade clauses:

Boston Bruins

No-movement clauses:

No-trade clauses:

Modified no-trade clauses:

Buffalo Sabres

No-movement clauses:

No-trade clauses: none

Modified no-trade clauses:

Read more

2027 NHL Free Agents

Pro Hockey Rumors’ up-to-date list of 2027 free agents is below. These are players who are eligible for restricted or unrestricted free agency after the 2026-27 season. The player’s 2027 age is in parentheses.

Players who are currently free agents or on our 2026 free agent list are not shown here. Players who have team or player options for the 2026/27 season aren’t listed below, but will be added to this list eventually if they remain on their current contracts.

This list will be continually updated. You’ll be able to access it anytime under the “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” menu on the right sidebar on our desktop site, or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu. If you have any corrections or omissions, please get in touch with us.

Updated Dec. 25, 2025 (2:13 p.m. CT)


Unrestricted Free Agents

Centers

Left Wingers

Right Wingers

Left-Shot Defensemen

Right-Shot Defensemen

Goaltenders


Restricted Free Agents

Centers

Left Wingers

Right Wingers

Left-Shot Defensemen

Right-Shot Defensemen

Goaltenders

Assessing The Kraken’s Goaltending Situation

The Kraken entered the break on a strong note with three straight wins, but they’ve only won four of their last 14 games. Thanks to many of their tweener companions in the West struggling, they’re only three points out of a playoff spot with four games in hand on the Mammoth.

Seattle isn’t a surefire playoff team by any stretch at a record of 15-14-6, but given the level of goaltending they’ve received thus far from Joey Daccord, Philipp Grubauer and Matt Murray, they should be able to at least stay in the mix until the trade deadline. Seattle’s issue has clearly been its offense this year, which ranks third-last in the league at 2.54 goals per game. On the defensive side, Seattle’s 2.97 goals against per game rank 13th.

Earlier in 2025, two NHL contracts that seemed unmovable were those of Grubauer and Tristan Jarry. Jarry was dealt to the Oilers earlier this month after passing through waivers a year ago. However, his play this year opened the door for the Penguins to move him and his entire $5.375MM cap hit, even though it had another two years after this one.

Something that seemed impossible a year ago happened, and the Penguins netted two roster players and a second-round pick. The trade highlighted the limited goaltending options available across the NHL, which brings us to the Kraken and, specifically, Grubauer.

The 34-year-old has been a disaster since signing with Seattle as a free agent in 2021. The Stanley Cup winner signed a six-year deal worth $5.9MM annually, and he has never been able to give the Kraken anything close to the goaltending he provided to the Avalanche in his few seasons as their starter.

Grubauer was a Vezina Trophy finalist in his platform season, finishing third, and posted a 30-9-1 record with a .922 SV% and a 1.95 GAA. As impressive as those numbers were, his underlying numbers painted a clearer picture, minimizing Grubauer’s overall impact and suggesting a goaltender playing behind an excellent team. Grubauer still had to stop the saveable pucks and avoid the bad goals, and that’s precisely what he did, but he only registered 5.2 goals saved above expected (as per MoneyPuck), 11th in the league.

Fast-forward to that summer, when Seattle thought they were getting a netminder capable of backstopping them on deep playoff runs. Now, his contract has become one of, if not the, least movable agreements in the NHL, until perhaps this season.

Grubauer has started the season well, even though traditional metrics don’t necessarily reflect it. He has played 11 games this season, going 5-3-1 with a .911 SV% and a 2.59 GAA. Those numbers are nothing to write home about, but a deeper dive shows that Grubauer has 7.1 goals saved above expected on the year – the best figure on the Kraken.

That great start to the season could give Seattle the chance to move him, if he agrees. Grubauer has a modified no-trade clause in his contract, which further complicates a trade even if Seattle were able to find a dance partner.

To add to an already complicated dynamic, the third-string Murray is injured. Unfortunately, injuries have derailed a career that once looked incredibly bright. That said, when Murray returns to the lineup, the Kraken will presumably have three capable NHL goaltenders and will need to move one or assign one to the AHL.

This is where it gets really complicated. Losing Grubauer for Murray is a lateral move at this point, but is Seattle really willing to roll the dice with Murray as the backup? Hard to say, but talent-wise, Murray is more than capable, and the risk of moving Grubauer might just be worth it if it means shedding his massive contract, especially if the Kraken remain out of the playoff picture.

It’s not dissimilar to what the Penguins had to do to shed Jarry’s contract. They took back Stuart Skinner and are rolling with him and Arturs Silovs, but the big win is not having Jarry’s money on the books, which opens the door for Pittsburgh to do a lot next summer. Seattle could put itself in a similar spot if it moved all of Grubauer’s deal, which would bring it to $40MM in available cap room for 2026-27 with just six players to sign (as per PuckPedia)

Seattle has already begun selling off free agents, as evidenced by the Mason Marchment trade to the Blue Jackets, and is signalling that it plans to punt on this season. Murray is a pending free agent, but even if Seattle were to trade the two-time Stanley Cup Champion, it wouldn’t get much for him given his play in previous seasons and his long injury history. The Kraken’s best course of action is to try to move Grubauer for something, anything really, to clear the books and make some bigger moves next summer.

Now, teams are obviously desperate for goaltending, but that doesn’t mean Seattle can move all of Grubauer’s contract. They should be able to move half or more, but they have to do it soon, so his play doesn’t fall back to the level it was at in the last few seasons. They also need to be concerned that a team like Pittsburgh tries to move Skinner, which would further diminish Seattle’s trading partners.

2026 NHL Free Agents By Team

Pro Hockey Rumors’ up-to-date list of 2026 free agents by team is below. These are players who are eligible for restricted or unrestricted free agency after the 2025-26 season.

Restricted free agents are marked with (RFA). Potential Group VI unrestricted free agents are marked with the games played total they need to reach to be eligible for RFA status, if attainable. Players not currently on a team’s active roster, injured reserve, non-roster list, or buried list are not listed.

This list will continue to be updated throughout the 2025-26 season, so be sure to use it and our list of 2026 free agents by position/type as points of reference. Players are ordered by expiry status and cap hit.

Both lists can be found anytime under “Pro Hockey Rumors Features” on the right-hand sidebar of our desktop site, or under the Flame icon on our mobile menu. If you have any corrections or omissions, please contact us.

Updated Jan. 7, 2026 (10:50 a.m. CT)


Anaheim Ducks

  1. Jacob Trouba
  2. Petr Mrázek
  3. Radko Gudas
  4. Ryan Poehling
  5. LW Ross Johnston
  6. Jansen Harkins
  7. LW Cutter Gauthier (RFA)
  8. Leo Carlsson (RFA)
  9. Ian Moore (RFA)
  10. Pavel Mintyukov (RFA)
  11. Olen Zellweger (RFA)

Boston Bruins

  1. RW Viktor Arvidsson
  2. Andrew Peeke
  3. LW Jeffrey Viel
  4. Jonathan Aspirot
  5. LW Alex Steeves (Group VI)
  6. LW Matěj Blümel (Group VI)
  7. Michael Callahan (Group VI)
  8. Jordan Harris (RFA)
  9. Vladislav Kolyachonok (RFA)

Buffalo Sabres

  1. RW Alex Tuch
  2. LW Beck Malenstyn
  3. Jacob Bryson
  4. Joshua Dunne
  5. Peyton Krebs (RFA)
  6. Michael Kesselring (RFA)
  7. LW Zach Benson (RFA)
  8. RW Josh Doan (RFA)
  9. LW Isak Rosen (RFA)

Calgary Flames

  1. Rasmus Andersson
  2. LW Ryan Lomberg
  3. Jake Bean
  4. Justin Kirkland
  5. Daniil Miromanov
  6. John Beecher (RFA)

Carolina Hurricanes

  1. Frederik Andersen
  2. Mike Reilly
  3. Mark Jankowski
  4. Brandon Bussi
  5. Alexander Nikishin (RFA)

Chicago Blackhawks

  1. Shea Weber
  2. LW Nick Foligno
  3. Connor Murphy
  4. Jason Dickinson
  5. RW Ilya Mikheyev
  6. Laurent Brossoit
  7. RW Sam Lafferty
  8. Matt Grzelcyk
  9. Connor Bedard (RFA)
  10. Ethan Del Mastro (RFA)
  11. LW Colton Dach (RFA)

Colorado Avalanche

  1. LW Victor Olofsson
  2. Sam Malinski
  3. LW Joel Kiviranta
  4. Brent Burns
  5. Ilya Solovyov (Group VI)
  6. Jack Drury (RFA)
  7. Zakhar Bardakov (RFA)

Columbus Blue Jackets

  1. Charlie Coyle
  2. LW Mason Marchment
  3. Erik Gudbranson
  4. Boone Jenner
  5. Ivan Fedotov
  6. Brendan Smith
  7. LW Zach Aston-Reese
  8. Brendan Gaunce
  9. Cole Sillinger (RFA)
  10. LW Yegor Chinakhov (RFA)
  11. Adam Fantilli (RFA)
  12. Jet Greaves (RFA)

Dallas Stars

  1. LW Jamie Benn
  2. RW Nathan Bastian
  3. Kyle Capobianco
  4. LW Adam Erne
  5. Alexander Petrovic
  6. LW Jason Robertson (RFA)
  7. Nils Lundkvist (RFA)
  8. Mavrik Bourque (RFA)

Detroit Red Wings

  1. Ben Chiarot
  2. RW Patrick Kane
  3. Cam Talbot
  4. Justin Holl
  5. Travis Hamonic
  6. LW James van Riemsdyk
  7. Erik Gustafsson
  8. LW John Leonard
  9. Simon Edvinsson (RFA)
  10. Jacob Bernard-Docker (RFA)

Edmonton Oilers

  1. Adam Henrique
  2. RW Jack Roslovic
  3. RW Kasperi Kapanen
  4. David Tomasek
  5. Connor Ingram
  6. LW Max Jones
  7. Calvin Pickard
  8. Curtis Lazar
  9. Noah Philp
  10. Spencer Stastney (RFA)

Florida Panthers

  1. Sergei Bobrovsky
  2. Daniil Tarasov
  3. Uvis Balinskis
  4. LW A.J. Greer
  5. Jeff Petry
  6. RW Luke Kunin
  7. Tomáš Nosek
  8. LW Noah Gregor
  9. Jack Studnicka
  10. RW Cole Schwindt (Group VI – needs 33 GP this season for RFA)
  11. RW Mackie Samoskevich (RFA)
  12. Donovan Sebrango (RFA)

Los Angeles Kings

  1. Anže Kopitar
  2. LW Andrei Kuzmenko
  3. RW Corey Perry
  4. Pheonix Copley
  5. Jacob Moverare
  6. LW Jeff Malott
  7. Brandt Clarke (RFA)

Minnesota Wild

  1. RW Vladimir Tarasenko
  2. RW Mats Zuccarello
  3. Zach Bogosian
  4. LW Marcus Johansson
  5. RW Vinnie Hinostroza
  6. David Jiříček (RFA)
  7. Daemon Hunt (RFA)

Montreal Canadiens

  1. LW Patrik Laine
  2. LW Sammy Blais
  3. Kirby Dach (RFA)
  4. Arber Xhekaj (RFA)
  5. LW Alexandre Texier (RFA)
  6. Joe Veleno (RFA)
  7. RW Zachary Bolduc (RFA)

 Nashville Predators

  1. LW Michael Bunting
  2. Erik Haula
  3. LW Cole Smith
  4. Michael McCarron
  5. Nick Blankenburg
  6. LW Tyson Jost
  7. Justin Barron (RFA)
  8. Fedor Svechkov (RFA)

New Jersey Devils

  1. RW Evgenii Dadonov
  2. Juho Lammikko
  3. Dennis Cholowski
  4. Luke Glendening
  5. RW Zack MacEwen
  6. Colton White
  7. LW Arseny Gritsyuk (RFA)
  8. Simon Nemec (RFA)
  9. LW Paul Cotter (RFA)

New York Islanders

  1. LW Anders Lee
  2. Jean-Gabriel Pageau
  3. Tony DeAngelo
  4. David Rittich
  5. RW Max Shabanov (RFA)
  6. Marc Gatcomb (RFA)
  7. Adam Boqvist (RFA)
  8. Marshall Warren (RFA)

New York Rangers

  1. LW Artemi Panarin
  2. Carson Soucy
  3. Jonathan Quick
  4. RW Jonny Brodzinski
  5. LW Conor Sheary
  6. Braden Schneider (RFA)
  7. Scott Morrow (RFA)
  8. LW Brett Berard (RFA)
  9. LW Brennan Othmann (RFA)

Ottawa Senators

  1. Nick Jensen
  2. LW David Perron
  3. RW Claude Giroux
  4. Lars Eller
  5. LW Nick Cousins
  6. Jordan Spence (RFA)
  7. Leevi Merilainen (RFA)
  8. Stephen Halliday (RFA)

Philadelphia Flyers

  1. LW Carl Grundström
  2. LW Nicolas Deslauriers
  3. Noah Juulsen
  4. Rodrigo Abols
  5. Trevor Zegras (RFA)
  6. Jamie Drysdale (RFA)
  7. RW Bobby Brink (RFA)
  8. Samuel Ersson (RFA)
  9. Emil Andrae (RFA)
  10. LW Nikita Grebenkin (RFA)
  11. RW Philip Tomasino (RFA)

Pittsburgh Penguins

  1. Evgeni Malkin
  2. Kevin Hayes
  3. Connor Clifton
  4. Brett Kulak
  5. LW Anthony Mantha
  6. Stuart Skinner
  7. Mathew Dumba
  8. LW Danton Heinen
  9. Noel Acciari
  10. Blake Lizotte
  11. Connor Dewar
  12. Ryan Shea
  13. Arturs Silovs (RFA)
  14. LW Ville Koivunen (RFA)
  15. Egor Zamula (RFA)

San Jose Sharks

  1. Carey Price
  2. John Klingberg
  3. Nick Leddy
  4. Mario Ferraro
  5. Timothy Liljegren
  6. LW Jeff Skinner
  7. Alex Nedeljkovic
  8. Vincent Desharnais
  9. RW Ryan Reaves
  10. Ty Dellandrea (RFA)
  11. RW Philipp Kurashev (RFA)
  12. Shakir Mukhamadullin (RFA)
  13. RW Collin Graf (RFA)
  14. Zack Ostapchuk (RFA)
  15. Vincent Iorio (RFA)

Seattle Kraken

  1. LW Jaden Schwartz
  2. RW Jordan Eberle
  3. Jamie Oleksiak
  4. LW Eeli Tolvanen
  5. Matt Murray
  6. Ben Meyers
  7. RW Ryan Winterton (RFA)
  8. RW Jacob Melanson (RFA)

St. Louis Blues

  1. RW Mathieu Joseph
  2. Oskar Sundqvist
  3. LW Robby Fabbri
  4. Philip Broberg (RFA)
  5. LW Dylan Holloway (RFA)
  6. RW Jonatan Berggren (RFA)
  7. Logan Mailloux (RFA)
  8. Matthew Kessel (RFA)

Tampa Bay Lightning

  1. RW Oliver Bjorkstrand
  2. Darren Raddysh
  3. Declan Carlile (Group VI)
  4. Curtis Douglas (Group VI)

Toronto Maple Leafs

  1. LW Calle Järnkrok
  2. Scott Laughton
  3. LW Bobby McMann
  4. Troy Stecher
  5. Matt Benning
  6. LW Matias Maccelli (RFA)
  7. LW Nicholas Robertson (RFA)
  8. Henry Thrun (RFA)

Utah Mammoth

  1. RW Nick Schmaltz
  2. LW Alexander Kerfoot
  3. Ian Cole
  4. Kevin Stenlund
  5. Juuso Välimäki
  6. Vítek Vaněček
  7. Nick DeSimone
  8. LW Michael Carcone
  9. RW Kailer Yamamoto
  10. Barrett Hayton (RFA)

Vancouver Canucks

  1. LW Evander Kane
  2. Derek Forbort
  3. Teddy Blueger
  4. RW Kiefer Sherwood
  5. David Kämpf
  6. Pierre-Olivier Joseph (RFA)
  7. Lukas Reichel (RFA)

Vegas Golden Knights

  1. Jeremy Lauzon
  2. LW Brandon Saad
  3. RW Reilly Smith
  4. Colton Sissons
  5. Ben Hutton
  6. LW Pavel Dorofeyev (RFA)
  7. Akira Schmid (RFA)

Washington Capitals

  1. LW Alex Ovechkin
  2. John Carlson
  3. Trevor van Riemsdyk
  4. LW Sonny Milano
  5. LW Brandon Duhaime
  6. RW Ethen Frank
  7. Connor McMichael (RFA)
  8. Hendrix Lapierre (RFA)

Winnipeg Jets

  1. RW Gustav Nyquist
  2. Luke Schenn
  3. Jonathan Toews
  4. Colin Miller
  5. Logan Stanley
  6. LW Tanner Pearson
  7. LW Cole Koepke
  8. Eric Comrie
  9. RW Cole Perfetti (RFA)
Show all