Headlines

  • Carter Hart, Others Found Not Guilty In Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial
  • Jets’ Adam Lowry Continues To Recover From Hip Surgery
  • Blues Sign Justin Carbonneau, Nikita Susuev
  • Sharks Sign No. 2 Overall Pick Michael Misa
  • Kirill Kaprizov’s Camp Rejects Eight-Year, $16MM AAV Offer
  • Blackhawks At Comfortable Spot In Connor Bedard Extension Talks
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • MLB Trade Rumors
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors

Pro Hockey Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • Atlantic
      • Boston Bruins
      • Buffalo Sabres
      • Detroit Red Wings
      • Florida Panthers
      • Montreal Canadiens
      • Ottawa Senators
      • Tampa Bay Lightning
      • Toronto Maple Leafs
    • Central
      • Chicago Blackhawks
      • Colorado Avalanche
      • Dallas Stars
      • Minnesota Wild
      • Nashville Predators
      • St. Louis Blues
      • Utah Mammoth
      • Winnipeg Jets
    • Metropolitan
      • Carolina Hurricanes
      • Columbus Blue Jackets
      • New Jersey Devils
      • New York Islanders
      • New York Rangers
      • Philadelphia Flyers
      • Pittsburgh Penguins
      • Washington Capitals
    • Pacific
      • Anaheim Ducks
      • Calgary Flames
      • Edmonton Oilers
      • Los Angeles Kings
      • San Jose Sharks
      • Seattle Kraken
      • Vancouver Canucks
      • Vegas Golden Knights
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Partners
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
Go To MLB Trade Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Arbitration

Montreal Canadiens Sign Alex Galchenyuk To Three-Year Deal

July 5, 2017 at 5:10 pm CDT | by Gavin Lee 1 Comment

Despite filing for arbitration earlier today, Alex Galchenyuk has reached a contract with the Montreal Canadiens. The deal will pay him $4.9MM per season for the next three years, taking him to unrestricted free agency in the summer of 2020. According Renaud Lavoie of TVA, the contract does not include a no-movement deal or any additional clauses. This deal buys Montreal one year of service past when Galchenyuk would otherwise have become unrestricted.

Galchenyuk has had trouble finding his role in Montreal, being shifted from wing to center and back again. There was the growing sense that Galchenyuk may have been on the outs, but with the loss Alexander Radulov his signing became a necessity. The Canadiens have been hunting for a number one center for what seems like eons, and the organization must now hope Galchenyuk will round out his game sufficiently and grow into that position. With this contract, the team receives a very productive player at a significant discount, with the extra year providing the team cap relief if he progresses.

Galchenyuk struggled with injuries as well as the aforementioned coaching decisions last year, losing  21 games to a lower body injury. He wasn’t on pace to match the 30 goals of 2015-16, but at only 23 years old, Galchenyuk still has time to develop as an NHL player. Montreal media and management were particularly down on the flashy, creative forward when he went long stretches with few points. He will likely never be a top-tier defensive forward, but he should become more capable in the other two zones under the proper direction. This contract seemingly will put a halt to the trade rumors swirling around the talented playmaker. GM Marc Bergevin had reportedly been seeking a solid hockey trade for Galchenyuk for months.

When you look at Galchenyuk’s career production, he’s very clearly an upper-echelon center, though whether he is a first or second line player is debatable. He’s averaged a .60 PPG through his career, but if we look at his 2015-16 season as a more accurate representation of his abilities, it wouldn’t be unrealistic to see him hitting 60 points nearly every year.

Galchenyuk’s contract brings the team to $65.84 MM against the cap with 13 forwards, 7 defensemen, and 2 goalies signed. The organization only has goalie prospect Charlie Lindgren (an RFA) left to sign, though they may dip into the sparse free agent pool for another depth player.

Arbitration| Free Agency| Injury| Marc Bergevin| Montreal Canadiens| NHL| RFA Alex Galchenyuk| Alexander Radulov| Charlie Lindgren

1 comment

Jesper Fast Signs Three-Year Deal With New York Rangers

July 5, 2017 at 1:05 pm CDT | by Gavin Lee 1 Comment

The New York Rangers have locked up Jesper Fast for a few more years, signing him today to a three-year $5.55MM contract. Fast was eligible to file for arbitration before today’s deadline. He will be an unrestricted free agent at the contract’s conclusion. The $1.85MM average salary is a $900K raise over his last deal. Jesper Fast

Fast played 68 games for the Rangers last season, again cracking the 20-point mark despite a limited role. That role may increase slightly next season, as Fast continues to show that he can produce at both ends of the rink. If given the chance, 40 points doesn’t seem out of the question in his prime years though he also has excellent value in a checking role.

For a team that has lost Oscar Lindberg and Derek Stepan already this summer, getting Fast back under contract for a reasonable contract was imperative. It is interesting that they didn’t get him signed for longer, but with cap space dwindling and a new deal for Mika Zibanejad still needed, the Rangers likely couldn’t afford to buy out many free agent years.

Instead, Fast will be on the open market at 28 in the summer of 2020. If he can continue his performance for the next few seasons, and even show a little more offense he’ll be highly sought-after in free agency. Not bad for a sixth-round pick.

Photo courtesy USA Today Sports Images

Arbitration| New York Rangers Jesper Fast

1 comment

2017 Arbitration Tracker

July 5, 2017 at 11:26 am CDT | by Gavin Lee Leave a Comment

The deadline to file for player-elected salary arbitration comes in at 4pm this Wednesday, July 5th, while the next day brings the deadline for team-elected filings. To understand the entire arbitration process, make sure you read Mike Furlano’s Capology 101 posts on the process (part 1, part 2).

Below, you can find a complete list of arbitration eligible players broken down by team, and their decisions as they come in. Refresh this page often as new information will be added as it comes in.

Read more

Anaheim Ducks:

F Max Gortz — Will not file, playing in SHL.

Arizona Coyotes: 

F Jordan Martinook — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Craig Morgan, AZ Sports).

Boston Bruins: 

F Ryan Spooner — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Joe Haggerty, CSNNE)

G Zane McIntyre — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Tim Schaller — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed one-year, $775K deal after deadline.
F Austin Czarnik  — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Buffalo Sabres:

G Robin Lehner — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Johan Larsson — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Nathan Beaulieu — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Zemgus Girgensons — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Evan Rodrigues — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Calgary Flames: 

F Michael Ferland — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Linden Vey — Will not file, playing in KHL.
F Garnet Hathaway — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Tyler Wotherspoon — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
G David Rittich — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Carolina Hurricanes:

(none)

Chicago Blackhawks:

D Erik Gustafsson — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Colorado Avalanche:

F Matt Nieto — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Rocco Grimaldi — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Gabriel Bourque — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Duncan Siemens — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Columbus Blue Jackets: 

(none)

Dallas Stars:

F Matej Stransky — Will not file, playing in KHL.
F Brett Ritchie — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Jamie Oleksiak — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Detroit Red Wings:

F Tomas Tatar — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Ansar Khan, MLive)

D Robbie Russo — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Edmonton Oilers:

D Joey Laleggia — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

D Dillon Simpson — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Florida Panthers: 

D Mark Pysyk — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed three-year, $8.2MM contract after deadline.

Los Angeles Kings: 

D Kevin Gravel — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Nick Shore — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed one-year, $925K contract after deadline.
F Andrew Crescenzi — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Michael Mersch — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Jonny Brodzinski — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Paul LaDue — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Minnesota Wild: 

F Mikael Granlund — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Michael Russo, Star Tribune)
F Nino Niederreiter — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Michael Russo, Star Tribune)

F Marcus Foligno — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Kurtis Gabriel — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Zack Mitchell — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
G Steve Michalek — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Montreal Canadiens: 

F Alex Galchenyuk — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed three-year, $14.7MM deal after deadline.

Nashville Predators: 

F Viktor Arvidsson — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Austin Watson — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.
G Marek Mazanec — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Ryan Johansen — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Frederick Gaudreau — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

New Jersey Devils: 

G Scott Wedgewood — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Kevin Rooney — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Blake Pietila — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Blake Coleman — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Ben Thomson — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Vojtech Mozik — Will not file, playing in KHL.

New York Islanders:

D Calvin De Haan — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Arthur Staple, Newsday)

G Kristers Gudlevskis — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Connor Jones — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

New York Rangers:

F Mike Zibanejad — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Jesper Fast — Signed three-year, $5.55MM deal prior to deadline.
F Nicklas Jensen — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Daniel Catenacci — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Ottawa Senators: 

F Jean-Gabriel Pageau — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Bruce Garrioch, Postmedia)
F Ryan Dzingel — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

Philadelphia Flyers: 

F Roman Lyubimov — Will not file, playing in KHL.
F Cole Bardreau — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Pittsburgh Penguins:

F Conor Sheary — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Josh Yohe, DK Pittsburgh Sports)
D Brian Dumoulin — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Josh Yohe, DK Pittsburgh Sports)

F Josh Archibald — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

San Jose Sharks:

F Marcus Sorensen — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Barclay Goodrow — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

St. Louis Blues: 

D Colton Parayko — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Andy Strickland, Fox Sports)

G Jordan Binnington — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Tampa Bay Lightning:

F Ondrej Palat — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Ken Campbell, The Hockey News)
F Tyler Johnson — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (Joe Smith, Tampa Bay Times)

F Tanner Richard — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Tye McGinn — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F Michael Bournival — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Toronto Maple Leafs:

F Zach Hyman — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed four-year, $9MM deal after deadline.

Vancouver Canucks:

F Reid Boucher — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration (CapFriendly)
F Michael Chaput — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Joseph Labate — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
D Nikita Tryamkin — Will not file, playing in KHL.

Vegas Golden Knights:

D Nate Schmidt — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Teemu Pulkkinen — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed one-year, $700K contract after deadline.

Washington Capitals: 

G Philipp Grubauer — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration. Signed a one-year, $1.5MM contract after the deadline.
F Travis Boyd — Signed a one-year, $650K contract before the deadline.

Winnipeg Jets:

G Connor Hellebuyck — Filed for player-elected salary arbitration.

F Brandon Tanev — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.
F J.C. Lipon — Did not file for player-elected salary arbitration.

Arbitration| Free Agency| Newsstand| RFA

0 comments

Arbitration Deadline Quickly Approaching

July 4, 2017 at 10:46 am CDT | by Gavin Lee Leave a Comment

With the heavy lifting of free agency now over, most teams in the NHL will turn their attention to their own restricted free agents and the upcoming deadlines for salary arbitration. Tomorrow, July 5th, is the deadline for player-elected arbitration while teams get until Thursday, July 6th to notify of team-elected arbitration. Those terms may sound similar, but they come with a few key differences.

A team is only allowed to take two players to team-elected arbitration each season, and each player only once in his career. That means, if a team—any team, not only the one he’s currently with—has elected salary arbitration in the past, they may not do so again with that player. Last year, the only club-elected filing was with Petr Mrazek, who ended up signing a two-year deal with the team before his hearing. That won’t change the fact that no team can elect to take him to arbitration again, as the filing is all that counts. Peter Mrazek

The opposite side has the decision on whether the resulting contract will be a one-year or two-year, and in certain situations the club has “walk away” rights. If the arbitration award is more than ~$4.0MM (this number changes with the average league salary, and has yet to be set for this arbitration season) the team can decline one year of the contract, meaning if they’d selected a one-year deal the player would become an unrestricted free agent.

For a full breakdown of how the arbitration process works, make sure to check out our own Mike Furlano’s fantastic Capology 101 series from last year. The arbitration sections can be found here and here.

As for potential arbitration cases, it’s important to note that not all restricted free agents are eligible. Leon Draisaitl, and David Pastrnak among many others are still too early in their careers to elect arbitration, making any potential deal come down to their negotiations with the team. The Capology pieces have all the details on how it is determined, but some of the biggest names that are eligible are:

Mikael Granlund – 81 GP, 26 G, 43 A, 69 P

Granlund and fellow Minnesota Wild forward Nino Niederreiter—who has actually already filed according to Michael Russo of the Star Tribune—are both eligible for arbitration, and have some of the strongest cases in the group. Coming off his third straight 40+ point season, and a $3MM contract, should the Wild and Granlund not be able to reach a deal before his hearing he would be in line for a big raise.

Ryan Johansen – 82 GP, 14 G, 47 A, 61 P

There has already been reports of Johansen asking for an $8.5MM per year contract, which would make him one of the highest-paid centers in the league. Though his arbitration amount wouldn’t be that high, he has quite the case as one of the premiere up-and-coming talents in the league.

Alex Galchenyuk – 61 GP, 17 G, 27 A, 44 P

One of the most talked about RFAs in the league, Galchenyuk has simultaneously been the talk of much trade speculation and contract negotiation. The Canadiens are in active discussions with him, but if something can’t get done an arbitration date could settle the debate for them.

As with any year, most of the free agents that file for salary arbitration will sign a contract before a hearing ever happens. But with such a strong group of RFAs this year, we might be in for some interesting decisions as the time ticks down. After filing, the league will set hearing dates that should fall between July 20th and August 4th.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

Arbitration| Free Agency| RFA

0 comments

Galchenyuk Negotiations Intensify

July 3, 2017 at 6:08 pm CDT | by Seth Lawrence 2 Comments

Alex Galchenyuk has suddenly gone from pariah to absolute necessity. In the wake of losing top scoring threat Alexander Radulov via free agency to the Dallas Stars, Galchenyuk, a restricted free agent, has seen his internal value skyrocket. Radulov, of course, signed with the Stars earlier today for 5 seasons, and the Montreal offense was already severely lacking. Galchenyuk had a respectable 44 points in only 61 games last season, but that was a marginal drop from his 30-goal, 56-point campaign the year prior.

One of the largest issues for Galchenyuk this last season was consistency in his production, and many link that to his constant switching between the center and left wing roles. Galchenyuk is a more natural center, and has stated as such on numerous occasions. His defensive play has left many fans wanting, however. Two separate coaching staffs placed him on the wing at different points, and the organization has stated pretty clearly that he isn’t ready for top-line center duties. The problem for Montreal of course, is that they don’t have anyone else nearly as capable to fill that role. Tomas Plekanec is another year older and Galchenyuk is already arguably the better player. With Radulov (a right-wing) out of the picture, it might be wise to keep Galchenyuk content and comfortable.

According to Darren Dreger, Galchenyuk’s agent Pat Brisson has been in contact with GM Marc Bergevin, who will now turn his attention primarily to this contract. If they can’t come to an agreement, arbitration is always an option that can be utilized. That said, arbitration would probably only serve to fan the flames that have surrounded this player since he was supposedly placed on the block a year ago. Those flames are still not going out until that contract has been signed, and there will always be a market for young, talented centers.

When Jonathan Drouin was acquired for the left side, it seemed as though the writing was on the wall. But now, with Radulov out of the picture, losing Galchenyuk’s top-six offensive abilities would be a massive blow to the team. Montreal finished 13th in Goals For, but only two players hit the 20 goal mark – Max Pacioretty (35) and Paul Byron (22). Losing their top assist man and second-leading point getter in Radulov, it would be entirely devastating to draw the Galchenyuk negotiations out into the season, or worse, to trade him following a down year. Galchenyuk and his agent know they have the leverage in negotiations, and there’s a strong possibility they’ll use every ounce of it to get a better deal for the 23-year-old talent. Considering his production and league wide comparisons, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to see him make well above $5 MM.

Arbitration| Calgary Flames| Dallas Stars| Free Agency| Marc Bergevin| Players Alex Galchenyuk| Alexander Radulov| Jonathan Drouin| Max Pacioretty| Paul Byron

2 comments

Canadiens And Galchenyuk Face Difficult Negotiations

June 4, 2017 at 8:00 pm CDT | by Seth Lawrence 1 Comment

There is a great deal of uncertainty in Montreal after a disappointing first round exit, where they struggled to score goals with consistency. The issues at center ice continue to haunt the organization. Thomas Plekanec has slowed down with age and could easily find himself exposed in the expansion draft, if not traded away later in the season. They need Alex Galchenyuk to become a bonafide top-six (if not #1) center. And yet, this past season, he struggled mightily down the stretch. His 2-year bridge deal is now expired and the RFA will need to come to terms with the Montreal franchise which has expressed quite a bit of frustration with his play.

Arbitration is certainly an option for Galchenyuk. The player’s agent, Pat Brisson is certainly willing to negotiate a one-year deal, but will the Canadiens want to risk Alex having a career year and skyrocketing his cost? That decision could be unwise tactically on the part of management. Ryan Spzorger of The Hockey Writers believes that the Canadiens would be foolish to pass up the opportunity to sign the potential number-one center long term. Especially after a relatively “down” season, Galchenyuk could be signed to a relative bargain, keeping the Canadiens’ cap structure reasonable for years to come.

There are two major issues which could cause negotiations to stall. First, there is a definite gap in perceived value between the player and the organization. The Canadiens have repeatedly dropped Galchenyuk down the lineup, with the player seeing the third line these playoffs alongside the likes of Andrew Shaw and Artturi Lehkonen. Fellow 23 year-old Phillip Danault usurped his spot on the top line, and the mediocre Tomas Plekanec leapfrogged him as well. His defensive play has been the subject of constant criticism, both under current coach Claude Julien as well as former coach Michel Therrien. Second, he has continually been shuffled from wing to center and back again. Players who have played the majority of their career up the middle don’t often appreciate the shift, nor react well to it. Although Galchenyuk has obviously been frustrated with the situation, he has tried his best to adapt to a foreign position on the left side, to little success.

Galchenyuk’s value as a trade piece shouldn’t be understated if the gap between the negotiating parties is too great. GM Marc Bergevin could be tempted to move him for a more “established” center if the offers from other teams increase in frequency. In the end, it seems likely that the parties will compromise on a short-term contract somewhere in the range of $5-6 MM. This would provide Galchenyuk further incentive to perform and gives Montreal an “out” if he continues to regress. A year removed from a 30 goal, 56 point season, it would be a mistake to not include Galchenyuk as part of the Canadiens’ future plans.

Arbitration| Claude Julien| Marc Bergevin| Michel Therrien| Montreal Canadiens| Players| RFA Alex Galchenyuk| Andrew Shaw| Artturi Lehkonen| Phillip Danault

1 comment

Jyrki Jokipakka Will Not Receive Qualifying Offer, Will Play In Europe Next Season

May 30, 2017 at 12:29 pm CDT | by Gavin Lee Leave a Comment

According to Bruce Garrioch of Postmedia, Jyrki Jokipakka will not be given a qualifying offer this summer by the Ottawa Senators. The 25-year old defenseman was arbitration eligible and set to become a restricted free agent, but instead will head to Europe to play in the professional ranks there.

Jokipakka was acquired by the Senators in the Curtis Lazar trade at the deadline from the Calgary Flames, but his Ottawa tenure will come to an end before it even really begins. He played just three games for the Senators down the stretch and never suited up in the playoffs. He was apparently next in line behind Erik Karlsson, but the Ottawa captain played on a fractured foot instead of sitting in the press box.

Traded twice in his North American career, Jokipakka looked like he had an NHL future somewhere. While there is no indication where he’ll play next year, the Finnish defenseman played three seasons for Ilves Tampere of Liiga in Finland before coming over to the Dallas Stars’ system. Perhaps he’ll return to his home country and try to rebuild his game.

Arbitration| Ottawa Senators Jyrki Jokipakka

0 comments

Conor Sheary, Free Agency And Leverage

April 7, 2017 at 12:31 pm CDT | by Gavin Lee 2 Comments

When Conor Sheary began the season he was entering the second and final year of his entry-level contract, and coming off a Stanley Cup victory and a strong playoff performance. He’d duplicated his regular season point total in the postseason with 10 points and looked like a solid depth player for a team looking to contend once again. Conor Sheary Sidney Crosby

He’d spent time with Sidney Crosby in the playoffs and had great results, so the Penguins decided to try it again. What has happened this year has been magic. Sheary has blossomed into an exceptional offensive player alongside Crosby, scoring 53 points in 60 games, a rate that betters even his strong numbers at the University of Massachusetts and the AHL.

Heading into the summer, Sheary is a restricted free agent for the first time in his career and arbitration eligible. He’ll be looking for a big raise after such a successful season, and the Penguins will have to decide if he’s a long-term piece. Many would point to Crosby’s presence and think that Sheary wouldn’t have much leverage, that the diminutive winger would have trouble replicating his numbers without one of the game’s premiere centers beside him. As usual, it’s not that simple.

While Sheary is obviously helped a tremendous amount by Crosby’s presence, it works both ways. Without delving too far into the analytics world, it’s clear that Sheary has an effect on the duo’s dominance. Since the beginning of 2015 without Sheary (via Corsica), Crosby has a 53 CF% a simple metric of shots attempted and allowed during a player’s time on the ice. Sheary, in a small sample without Crosby, has the same number. But together the pair skyrocket up to a 56 CF%, showing how well their games mesh with each other. Crosby has found success like that with other players throughout his career, but there have also been several excellent players who just “don’t mesh” with his style and can’t play alongside him.

So then, when the two sides enter the negotiating room this summer it is not just the Penguins acting from a position of leverage. His presence on Crosby’s wing makes their star player even better than he already was, and don’t think the Sheary camp doesn’t know it. Even with just a single season of success, and a checkered history when it comes to development and performance, Sheary should be able to use his chemistry with one of the league’s top players and turn it into a long-term deal. After all, there is no guarantee anyone else could have the same effect.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

Arbitration| Free Agency| Pittsburgh Penguins Conor Sheary| Sidney Crosby

2 comments

Vladimir Sobotka Arrives In US, Signs Three-Year Extension

April 6, 2017 at 4:38 pm CDT | by Gavin Lee 2 Comments

After days of rumors that Vladimir Sobotka was working on a multi-year deal with the St. Louis Blues, the team has announced that he has signed his previously awarded arbitration contract, and agreed to a three-year extension worth $10.5MM ($3.5MM AAV) that will kick in next season. Sobotka will meet the team in Carolina for their Saturday night matchup against the Hurricanes, and is eligible for the playoffs. He will burn through a prorated version of his current $2.725MM deal this year, earning around $45K in the last four days of the season.

Sobotka has remained a thorn in the side of Doug Armstrong ever since. At times teasing that he would return, media and fans have discussed a reunion between the two sides for years now without one ever happening. Now, with just three games left in the St. Louis season, Sobotka will return to the NHL and look to make an impact right away. Vladimir Sobotka

The 29-year old center scored 30 points for Omsk this season in the KHL, and continued to show why fans hoped he would return. Despite never being the biggest player on the ice, Sobotka plays a fast, bang-and-crash style that can be effective against any opponent. He’ll never be a first-line player, but can provide a strong amount of depth down the middle and has been one of the best faceoff men in the world for several years.

All of these traits helped Sobotka play on both special teams in the past, and he could help the Blues in those areas once again—though, the team ranks fairly high in both already. With the team deciding to move Ivan Barbashev up to the first line today, Andy Strickland of Fox Sports commented on how head coach Mike Yeo believes Alex Steen is more dangerous from the wing. Adding Sobotka will help keep Steen there, while keeping the third line dangerous. Perhaps he can even get more out of Nail Yakupov, who has just nine points on the season.

At the end of the day for Blues fans, Sobotka’s return is an important one for the playoffs. Whether you think of him as a redundancy on a roster that gave Patrik Berglund a five-year extension just before the trade deadline, or the NHL version of a spurned-lover who can never be forgiven, if the team wants to go far into the playoffs depth is important. At this point, Sobotka represents an upgrade over some of the players who would be forced into the spotlight if a star suffered an injury.

Next year may be a different story, with the Blues committing a lot of money to players who are likely on the wrong side of their performance curve. With Colton Parayko in line for a big raise should they want to lock him up long-term, the team will find themselves pressed pretty tightly up to the cap. Only Scottie Upshall is coming off the books as an unrestricted free agent. In terms of the expansion draft, Sobotka was always eligible, but back on US soil and with a contract extension in tow, he would look much more attractive to the Vegas Golden Knights should he be left unprotected. That poses a bit of an issue, as the Blues have at least eight forwards (and likely a few more) that deserve protection. It will be interesting to see who they decide to expose, and if the Golden Knights go after potential or performance when selecting a Blues player.

Bob McKenzie of TSN was first to report that Sobotka was on US soil and undergoing his physical.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images

Arbitration| Newsstand| St. Louis Blues Bob McKenzie| Vladimir Sobotka

2 comments

Unpacking The Court’s Decision On The Wideman Suspension

March 16, 2017 at 8:32 pm CDT | by Mike Furlano 2 Comments

Yesterday the Southern District of New York confirmed a neutral arbitrator’s decision to reduce Dennis Wideman’s suspension from 20 games to 10 games. Wideman incurred the suspension after striking a referee during a game late last season (video link). Unless the NHL decides to appeal—which is unlikely given the ruling—this ends the Wideman disciplinary issue between the NHL and NHLPA.

The controversy centered on whether Rule 40.2 (intent to injure an official) or 40.3 (no intent to injure an official) applies. The NHL initially suspended Wideman 20 games under Rule 40.2. Rule 40.2 states that any player who deliberately strikes an official and causes injury, or deliberately applies physical force with intent to injure shall be suspended no less than 20 games. The rule defines intent to injure as any physical force that a player knew or should have known could reasonably be expected to cause injury. The NHLPA argued that 40.3 applied instead, which carries a lesser minimum suspension of 10 games. The NHLPA argued that Wideman’s concussion sustained just prior to hitting the official made him unable to comprehend the situation enough to satisfy intent to injure.

Read more

Under the CBA, the NHLPA can first appeal to Commissioner Gary Bettman. If the NHLPA is dissatisfied with the Commissioner’s decision, it could appeal to a neutral arbitrator. The arbitrator would not conduct a new hearing, but rather review Bettman’s decision, and hear new evidence not presented at the initial hearings. Bettman confirmed the NHL’s 20 game suspension, so the NHLPA appealed to the neutral arbitrator.

The neutral arbitrator ruled that the evidence did not support the NHL’s decision that Rule 40.2 applied. Rather, he found that 40.3 applied, and reduced Wideman’s suspension to 10 games.

The arbitrator’s decision wrestled with the CBA’s internal inconsistencies. The CBA defines the standard of review for the arbitrator, but those standards contradict themselves. First, the CBA says that the arbitrator must determine whether the NHL’s decision was supported by substantial evidence. Second, the CBA authorizes the arbitrator to consider new evidence not presented to the Commissioner. The introduction of new evidence seems to contradict reviewing whether the Commissioner’s decision was supported by the previous evidence.

The arbitrator resolved this by stating that the standard of review is whether the Commissioner’s decision is supported by the all the evidence, including the new evidence not previously available. If the arbitrator determines that the decision is not supported by the evidence, then the arbitrator has full remedial authority to issue another ruling.

Using this standard, the Arbitrator ruled that there was little to no evidence supporting Bettman’s decision that Wideman intended to injure the referee. He based this on two findings. First, that there was “not even a scintilla of evidence” that Wideman—with an excellent disciplinary record—would intentionally strike the referee. Second, that because Wideman was concussed (both parties agreed) he could not have anticipated that his applied force would cause the referee to fall and bang his head. The second finding was based on the arbitrator’s finding that the frame-by-frame video replay showed Wideman’s pushing the referee with his hand rather than crosschecking him.

The NHL disagreed with the arbitrator’s decision, fired the arbitrator, and filed a complaint in Federal Court to vacate the decision. The NHLPA responded by asking the Court to either dismiss the complaint or confirm the decision.

The Court granted the NHLPA’s second request and confirmed the arbitrator’s decision. The Court stated that it was bound by a very limited standard of review. It must confirm the arbitrator’s decision as long as the arbitrator was “arguably acting within the scope of his authority” and the award “draws its essence from the CBA.” Simply put, the Court must defer to the arbitrator unless no reasonable argument exists in the CBA to support his decision. Mere disagreement—that is, if the Court might have decided the issue another way—is not enough.

Bound to this standard, the Court found that the CBA was internally inconsistent, and the arbitrator worked within the CBA to rectify the contradictions. The arbitrator’s decision was reasonably based on the terms in the CBA, and that was enough for the Court.

 

Arbitration| Calgary Flames| NHL| NHLPA Dennis Wideman

2 comments
« Previous Page
Load More Posts
    Top Stories

    Carter Hart, Others Found Not Guilty In Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial

    Jets’ Adam Lowry Continues To Recover From Hip Surgery

    Blues Sign Justin Carbonneau, Nikita Susuev

    Sharks Sign No. 2 Overall Pick Michael Misa

    Kirill Kaprizov’s Camp Rejects Eight-Year, $16MM AAV Offer

    Blackhawks At Comfortable Spot In Connor Bedard Extension Talks

    Agent Comments On Sidney Crosby’s Future With Penguins

    Flames Sign Dustin Wolf To Seven-Year Extension

    Extending Jack Eichel Will Be A Top Priority For Golden Knights

    Hurricanes Sign Kevin Labanc To Professional Tryout

    Recent

    Snapshots: Blues Training Camp, Kolosov, Luchanko

    Buffalo Sabres Sign Alexandar Georgiev

    Transactions Notes: Flyers, Pokka, Robins

    Carter Hart, Others Found Not Guilty In Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial

    Additional Fallout Of Kirill Kaprizov’s Rejection Of Wild’s Offer

    Rookie Notes: Parekh, Connelly, Henry, Spellacy

    Jets’ Adam Lowry Continues To Recover From Hip Surgery

    Rookie Camp Notes: Tinordi, Luchanko, Molendyk

    East Notes: Zacha, Ristolainen, Paupanekis

    KHL’s Barys Astana Terminate Olivier Rodrigue’s Contract

    Rumors By Team

    Rumors By Team

    • Avalanche Rumors
    • Blackhawks Rumors
    • Blue Jackets Rumors
    • Blues Rumors
    • Bruins Rumors
    • Canadiens Rumors
    • Canucks Rumors
    • Capitals Rumors
    • Devils Rumors
    • Ducks Rumors
    • Flames Rumors
    • Flyers Rumors
    • Golden Knights Rumors
    • Hurricanes Rumors
    • Islanders Rumors
    • Jets Rumors
    • Kings Rumors
    • Kraken Rumors
    • Lightning Rumors
    • Mammoth Rumors
    • Maple Leafs Rumors
    • Oilers Rumors
    • Panthers Rumors
    • Penguins Rumors
    • Predators Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Red Wings Rumors
    • Sabres Rumors
    • Senators Rumors
    • Sharks Rumors
    • Stars Rumors
    • Wild Rumors

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2025’s Top 50 Unrestricted Free Agents
    • Rasmus Andersson Rumors
    • Erik Karlsson Rumors
    • Rickard Rakell Rumors
    • Bryan Rust Rumors

    Pro Hockey Rumors Features

    Pro Hockey Rumors Features

    • Support Pro Hockey Rumors And Go Ad-Free
    • 2025 NHL Free Agent List
    • 2026 NHL Free Agent List
    • Offseason Trade Tracker
    • PTO Tracker 2025
    • Summer Synopsis Series 2025
    • Training Camp Rosters 2025
    • Pro Hockey Rumors On X
    • Pro Hockey Rumors Polls

     

     

     

     

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives

    PHR Info

    • About
    • Privacy Policy
    • Commenting Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    Pro Hockey Rumors is not affiliated with National Hockey League, NHL or NHL.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version