3:25 pm: The Athletic’s Kevin Kurz confirms that Kane was at the Sharks’ practice facility yesterday, but was not present at the same time as the rest of the team. It’s an interesting development, but Kurz still notes that the “next step for him remains unclear.”
10:36 am: Before the month of November is over, Evander Kane will be an active NHL player once more. The controversial star is set to return from a 21-game suspension in nine days, as the San Jose Sharks play game No. 22 on November 30. But will Kane actually be back with the team and in the lineup at that time?
The Sharks have had nearly two months to ponder this question, but seem no closer to making a decision on Kane’s future. Curtis Pashelka of The San Jose Mercury News caught up with Sharks head coach Bob Boughner recently and received the same non-answer that he and GM Doug Wilson have continued to provide throughout the saga: “I don’t have any information… There are decisions that need to be made.”
Kane has been the center of attention in San Jose for over a year now, and surprisingly little of it is due to the actual cause of his suspension. Dating back to last year, Kane has filed for bankruptcy, been sued by his creditors, used the threat of a potential contract termination by the Sharks as a tool in his bankruptcy proceedings, faced allegations of betting on hockey and a full NHL investigation, as well as other unsavory allegations from his estranged wife, and battled rumors that many of his teammates were unhappy having him in the locker room. Yet, it was his use of a fake Coronavirus vaccination card to circumvent the NHL COVID Protocol that finally led to discipline.
Amidst all of the drama of the last year, Kane was also the Sharks leading scorer and set a personal career high in per-game production. After getting off to a solid 7-4-1 start without Kane this season, San Jose has lost four of their past five games as their offense has dried up. There is no question that the team could use Kane’s scoring ability, not to mention his physicality. The fact of the matter is that they also still owe him a considerable amount of money to provide this on-ice value for three more seasons beyond this year as well. The question that Wilson and Boughner must answer then is whether the off-ice concerns outweigh the on-ice benefits and, if so, what to do about it.
If the team believes that they can re-introduce Kane to the team without creating issues amongst both their locker room and their fan base, then the power forward may actually be back in the lineup come November 30. However, if Kane has simply become too polarizing, the Sharks will have to get creative in order to move him. Any potential trade interest, however unlikely, will be nowhere near market value for the talented scorer, but San Jose could jump at the first offer. They could also place Kane on waivers and see if anyone bites. Should Kane go unclaimed, he could be reassigned to the AHL and dealt with in the off-season similar to how the New York Rangers handled Anthony DeAngelo last year. However, as the Sharks and Barracuda share a building, it may not have the same impact. The Sharks could even just pay Kane to stay home, again kicking the can down the road. San Jose is in the unenviable position of both re-tooling and being strapped for cap space, so Wilson and company will do all they can to avoid an expensive buyout, which would be the last, worst case scenario option.
Whatever the decision on Kane, it needs to be made soon. The Sharks are on the clock to make a call that – one way or another – will have a substantial impact on their season and quite possibly the future of the organization.
Hahaha what a banner year for the most frustrating hockey player to come along in decades.
I don’t blame Kane’s teammates (or anyone) for not wanting him around. I’d bury him and buy him out if I were the GM. Team culture matters.
BUT, the union can’t allow the precedent of a player being made to sit home, even if they are paying him. Rendering him unable to showcase his skills, especially when he’ll likely need to find a new employer soon, is too far.
Were I the GM, I’d still sit him and try to drag it out, but would expect to lose that grievance hearing.
as the article states, their minor league team shares a building with them, so there is a chance of crossover there if they just bury him with the Cuda. And as a pro-team afraid of his influence on the team, having him there might not be in their best interest.
Second option is to tell him to stay home A la TDA last year. Then try to agree to a mutual buyout in the offseason. Then they either pay him full price to stay home if it can’t be agreed upon, or the buyout route.
Sure they can, forwhomjoshbelltolled — it happens all the time. How many guys are sitting at home getting paid because they’ve got guaranteed contracts but are too old to play useful hockey?
Bury him was the wrong term, I wouldn’t let him near my minor league players either.
I meant sit him at home with pay and then a buyout.
All of the other players who have accepted being sat (that I can recall) did so with mutual agreement, mainly because they didn’t want to get waived or ride AHL busses.
I can’t recall a player of his age and skill being sat in similar circumstances to these.
If they say send him to ahl but then tel him after to go home and not report I wonder if a million would still come off the cap and he wouldn’t have to pay escrow meaning he’d make a bunch more which would be good for his creditors
Yeah, buy him out and have an ~5 mil dead cap hit for the next 6 years. “Were I the GM…” yeah well, you’re not.
The saga of “Citizen Kane” continues…
Citizen Kane 2: Electric Boogaloo
If they retained 50% of his salary I bet they could unload him.
To who? Most teams that make bad decisions (as this would be) are already cap strapped. And those that have cap space are either rebuilding (with prospects you would not want in the same building as Kane) or have decided to pocket the money and won’t even pay the 50%. I don’t see a way out of SJ other than waivers, stay home, buyout.
Kane at 3.5 million is a insanely good deal the guys a good hockey player even if he is a garbage person
I wonder if they could loan him to a European pro team for the rest of the season and defer this decision til April or the off-season. See how he handles himself, it may do both parties some good to have this breather.
… no sympathy for Kane.
And why would there be really? The guys been a trouble his whole career. Now it turns out he’s a remorseless fraud and a hack demanding money from the nhl to fund shady political stuff and paint blue lines black. The NFL would love to have this knee bender around
as far as im concerned, the team just now deciding they are done is kinda silly. I get people like Kane, but I’m not cutting a guy for being bad with money, and id be shocked if the team felt that much a need to make a statement about a fake vaccine card. unless they really think letting him go will make Hertl or others stay, then you might just want to bite the bullet. the numbers say he’s a good player. if he acts up then you bench him or suspend him.